I somehow doubt that anything is going to put a dent in creationism.
Don't thank me --- thank God, Who gifted us those research scientists - including you.
Well, God made us (verb: 'asah) and gave us the powerful brain to use it.
So, I believe He wants you to use SCIENCE and hold its standards next to the Bible, because the Bible's purpose is "how to be saved" and not "how did life begin", that's SCIENCE's job to explain.
Creationism has always been impervious to logic, evidence, and reason.
Oh when I was a believer, I often thanked God for myself.
Well, that depends on how you interpret the second-coming.I do hold science up to a higher Standard, since God is the Author of science. And if it's science's job to explain how life began, they're taking too long. After all, why would God simultaneously give us the job of finding out how life began and tell us He is coming back soon? Does that make sense to you? So drop the Rodin Complex, it's working against you.
Not if it was written metaphorically and in a poetic language.AV said:p.s. God already explained to us, in writing, how life began.
If you think it's written metaphorically, that's your problem; but it does not give you the right to accuse those who don't as "throwing their brains in a trash can." FYI, Jesus didn't interpret Genesis 1 metaphorically, and neither do I, "brother."
Jesus also never once visited a dentist -- did you?
Then you'll go without dessert waiting for "science" to feed you.
You mean Theistic Evolutionists ?
A few examples of how science helps in securing abundant food:
Refrigeration
Weather satellites
modern agriculture
fertilizers
transportation
Pest control
Disease control
irrigation machinery
etc. etc. Ad infinitum!
If you want to play the "scientists gives us..." trumpcard, start with this list.
Creationists have given us:
1. Antiseptic Surgery
2. Bacteriology
3. Calculus
4. Celestial Mechanics
5. Chemistry
6. Comparative Anatomy
7. Computer Science
8. Dimensional Analysis
9. Dynamics
10. Electrodynamics
11. Electromagnetics
12. Electronics
13. Energetics
14. Entomology of LivingInsects
15. Field Theory
16. Fluid Mechanics
17. Galactic Astronomy
18. Gas Dynamics
19. Genetics
20. Glacial Geology
21. Gynecology
22. Hydraulics
23. Hydrography
24. Hydrostatics
25. Ichtyology
26. Isotopic Chemistry
27. Model Analysis
28. Natural History
29. Non-Euclidean Geometry
30. Oceanography
31. Optical Mineralogy
32. Paleontology
33. Pathology
34. Physical Astronomy
35. ReversibleThermodynamics
36. Statistical Thermodynamics
37. Stratigraphy
38. Systematic Biology
39. Thermodynamics
40. Thermokinetics
41. Vertebrate Paleontology
In addition, they have given us:
1. Absolute Temperature Scale
2. Actuarial Tables
3. Barometer
4. Biogenesis Law
5. Calculating Machine
6. Chloroform
7. Classification System
8. Double Stars
9. Electric Generator
10. Electric Motor
11. Ephemeris Tables
12. Fermentation Control
13. Galvanometer
14. Global Star Catalog
15. Inert Gases
16. Kaleidoscope
17. Law of Gravity
18. Mine Safety Lamp
19. Pasteurization
20. Reflecting Telescope
21. Scientific Method
22. Self-Induction
23. Telegraph
24. Thermionic Valve
25. Trans-Atlantic Cable
26. Vaccination and Immunization
Is this what you meant by "Etc, etc, ad infinitum"?
Ignorance-you were saying.Thats very tricky word play.
You realize Tanzanos said "Science" not "Scientist". How is Creation (in your case Genesis 1:1) used to discover or develop any of these things on your list? this should be interesting.
Science does not switch with Creationist. A Creationist can use science for anything, and they might have in some cases. Its just that they they abandon Science with it conflicts with their belief. Your post proves only your ignorance.
If you could, I would like you to back up your claims, and go down the list and explain how each is attributed to creationist. I'm going to guess that you did not research this yourself so you will not be able to justify the list itself, but instead you grabbed it from someplace. I could be pleasely surprised though. So do tell. If you do not back up your claim, then its rubbish, and your a lier.
I did state that "science gave us".
Maybe you should converse in daycare language, since name calling is what kids do, and I believe you understand that quite well.I did state that "science gave us". I said nothing of scientists. They could have been gay, blue, hairy, horned, or anything else for all science cares.
Science gave us all of the above from your list. Creationism had absolutely nothing to do with the above.
Perhaps we should converse in Greek since you show a poor understanding of the English language.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?