"Life and its building blocks are way too complicated to have evolved." [moved]

[AV1611VET]

The human footprint is the same depth as the dinosaur footprint.

No, they aren't the same depth.

 

[Dr GS Hurd]

There are numerous problems with the fossil claim, as documented here: http://paleo.cc/paluxy/delk.htm .

There is an even bigger problem with Carl Baugh's fake foot prints (which he bought). The foot prints did not disturb any micro lensing. The colored lines trace the different clay, silt, and fine sand layers. Any foot prints would have disturbed them;

Then there is the faked patina made with acid...

 

[AV1611VET]

The foot prints did not disturb any micro lensing.

Erosion couldn't handle that?

 

[loveofourlord]

GM Crops are banned in 38 countries. Why do you suppose people do not believe that these mutated foods are good for them?

Because people are idiots and rather believe in fear mongering and such over rational discourse, hardly something new, and politicians will cater to idiots if they think or fear doing so or not will hurt their election chances, just have to look at all the dumb things that get voted on.

 

[-57]

Dude, I've seen a lot of the evidence first-hand; when multiple independent lines of evidence, across many domains of knowledge, tell the same story, a reasonable person should take them seriously.

Step barefoot into some mud...look at the prints. You'll instantly see that your evo-minded boys really don't know what the heck they're talking about.

 

[-57]

But strangely there was no designer for the designer, perhaps the designer wasn't complicated enough to need a designer.

The designer always was and never was not. For it to be any other way would be impossible.

 

[-57]

So far I haven't seen anything here to support the central thesis, that evolution is so complicated god himself couldn't do it. Now we find "evidence", the claim that a dinosaur supposedly stepped on a human footprint.

post 3. You asked the question in post 1 and post 3 answered it.

 

[-57]

The CT scan was made in a medical center by medical people, who had no expertise in studying fossils, who made no lab report of what they found. Their claims of compression of the layers by the footprints has been shown to be false.

The least you could have done was done your HOMEWORK. The following picture clearly shows your statement to be FALSE which doesn't look very good for your source. I believe you LOST this issue.

 

[USincognito]

Step barefoot into some mud...look at the prints. You'll instantly see that your evo-minded boys really don't know what the heck they're talking about.

I head the voices of irony meters all over the world crying out in pain.

 

[-57]

Man, Creationists will believe anything.

http://paleo.cc/paluxy/delk.htm

The problem for you is this....so far every attempt to prove the fossil to be a fraud has been dismantled.

So, do tell us just what it is.

 

[-57]

I know that actually thinking about things before posting is not a favorite past time of yours, but instead of doing some insipid home experiment, why don't you answer a simple question - Baugh claims the dinosaur footprint is an Acrocanthosaurus which were 11 ft. long and weighed 6 tons. The human footprint is the same depth as the dinosaur footprint. So, which is it, the human weighed 6 tons or and 11 ft. long dinosaur weighed 140 lbs.?

Or perhaps the dino didn't weigh what you claimed....OR, perhaps the mud wasn't as soft and the dino didn't sink in as far.

You need to learn to think out of your textbook box. Realize reality.

 

[USincognito]

Or perhaps the dino didn't weigh what you claimed....OR, perhaps the mud wasn't as soft and the dino didn't sink in as far.

Or maybe it had wings and could fly. Maybe was a ninja and was light on it's feet. Or, maybe, it was the size and weight that the skeletons suggest and therefore the "print" is problematic because you either have a 6 ton human or a 150 lb. dinosaur.

You need to learn to think out of your textbook box. Realize reality.

And you need to learn that ad hoc rationalizations are logically fallacious and not an actual explanation.

 

[Speedwell]

The problem for you is this....so far every attempt to prove the fossil to be a fraud has been dismantled.

LOL! There have been no attempts, only suspicions. Baugh keeps it too close for anything else.

 

[USincognito]

The problem for you is this....so far every attempt to prove the fossil to be a fraud has been dismantled.

So, do tell us just what it is.

It's a fraud. Just like everything Mr. Carl Baugh has in his museum. Especially himself.

 

[doubtingmerle]

post 3. You asked the question in post 1 and post 3 answered it.

Post 3 said the motor protein is complex. We all agree it is complex. But you have furnished nothing to prove it is so complex that nature`s god could not have evolved it.

 

[-57]

Or maybe it had wings and could fly. Maybe was a ninja and was light on it's feet. Or, maybe, it was the size and weight that the skeletons suggest and therefore the "print" is problematic because you either have a 6 ton human or a 150 lb. dinosaur.



And you need to learn that ad hoc rationalizations are logically fallacious and not an actual explanation.

Oh, my bad. I apologize....I forgot your statement was the only way the fossils could have been made. Forgive me for questioning you.

 

[SteveB28]

Or perhaps the dino didn't weigh what you claimed....

So, it weighed approximately the same as a human??

OR, perhaps the mud wasn't as soft and the dino didn't sink in as far.

But, it was soft enough for the human to sink??

You need to learn to think out of your textbook box. Realize reality.

You are extremely amusing.........




.

 

[-57]

It's a fraud. Just like everything Mr. Carl Baugh has in his museum. Especially himself.

Here's a fraud I'm sure you'll enjoy.

Skip to the 4:50 min mark...then the fraud is exposed at the 6:18 min mark.

 

[SteveB28]

Oh, my bad. I apologize....I forgot your statement was the only way the fossils could have been made. Forgive me for questioning you.

You are exhibiting the crucial difference between that which is possible with that which is probable!

Unfortunately for you, you base your arguments around the former, rather than the latter.

 

[-57]

But, it was soft enough for the human to sink??

Are you guys for real? Seriously? You do realize there could have been time between when the human stepped into the mud.....time for it to harden a bit....then later the dino came along.