"Life and its building blocks are way too complicated to have evolved." [moved]

[-57]

You are exhibiting the crucial difference between that which is possible with that which is probable!

Unfortunately for you, you base your arguments around the former, rather than the latter.

Judging from your last post...I hope you don't mind if I don't reply to your nonsense.

 

[USincognito]

Oh, my bad. I apologize....I forgot your statement was the only way the fossils could have been made. Forgive me for questioning you.

 

[USincognito]

Skip to the 4:50 min mark...then the fraud is exposed at the 6:18 min mark.

Gish Gallop, eh? Tell you what, why don't you summarize Menton's claims in your own words. Assuming you can that is.

 

[MasonP]

The designer always was and never was not. For it to be any other way would be impossible.

How do you know this? the truth is you can't know, it's all simply made up and it's what you have been taught to believe.

 

[SteveB28]

Are you guys for real? Seriously? You do realize there could have been time between when the human stepped into the mud.....time for it to harden a bit....then later the dino came along.

Ah...I see. 'Goldilocks and the Three Bears' is your favourite story, isn't it....?

The mud wasn't too firm, not too soft.......it was juuuuust right...!

The time elapsed between human and reptile wasn't too long, not too short....it was juuuuust right....!

The reptile's footprint wasn't made just short of the human's, it wasn't just beyond the human's.....it was juuuuust right....!

How convenient...............

 

[SteveB28]

Judging from your last post...I hope you don't mind if I don't reply to your nonsense.

Yes, run, ......by all means....

 

[VirOptimus]

Are you guys for real? Seriously? You do realize there could have been time between when the human stepped into the mud.....time for it to harden a bit....then later the dino came along.

Let me ask you this, is there any chance at all that you are wrong on this issue? What evidence would you accept?

 

[joshua 1 9]

Because people are idiots and rather believe in fear mongering and such over rational discourse, hardly something new, and politicians will cater to idiots if they think or fear doing so or not will hurt their election chances, just have to look at all the dumb things that get voted on.

People want to make money. If they can make money selling healthy food they would sell healthy food. It just so happens that they make MORE money selling unhealthy food. So they are willing to destroy people and their health in order to make money. I remember when I went though cardio nutrition classes and there was a guy there that was the manager of a Dairy Queen. He was a real nice guy and he was basically killing people with kindness. Only he was now as sick as his customers because he ate all the same junk food as he was feeding them. The third leading cause of death in American is from eating the wrong food. Then when I tell people that good health is a choice they do not believe me. No matter what science is telling them.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Yes, run, ......by all means....

You should follow your own advice and learn how to run from nonsense.

 

[doubtingmerle]

So, you really expect to see a modern evolutionary based journal post something that destroys evolutionism?

Absolutely. If the object was submitted for analysis and found to be overwhelmingly in conflict with the prevailing paradigm, that would absolutely get published. The problem is that Baugh's fake rock has never had a thorough analysis for publishing, and never been made available for others to analyze.

And this rock would be devastating to evolution only if the rock is found to be 100 million years old, as most of the dino tracks in the area are. That would mean that people were here 100 million years ago, and we would need to explain it. If instead the rock dates to recent times, then we have an out of place dino fossil, and would need to explore the possibility that a dinosaur species in Texas survived until recent times.

But as long as the rock remains in the possession of a man who is known for similar frauds, and he refuses to share it, the rock is rejected by evolutionists and creationists alike.

 

[SteveB28]

You should follow your own advice and learn how to run from nonsense.

I'm not going anywhere.

I'll answer any relevant question put to me. You won't find me running from them.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Absolutely. If the object was submitted for analysis and found to be overwhelmingly in conflict with the prevailing paradigm, that would absolutely get published. The problem is that Baugh's fake rock has never had a thorough analysis for publishing, and never been made available for others to analyze.

And this rock would be devastating to evolution only if the rock is found to be 100 million years old, as most of the dino tracks in the area are. That would mean that people were here 100 million years ago, and we would need to explain it. If instead the rock dates to recent times, then we have an out of place dino fossil, and would need to explore the possibility that a dinosaur species in Texas survived until recent times.

But as long as the rock remains in the possession of a man who is known for similar frauds, and he refuses to share it, the rock is rejected by evolutionists and creationists alike.

The foot prints look human but they are not human. Because they do not follow the pattern of humans. Right now this is an unknown. Some people believe that the footprints were made by an angel that was assigned by God to watch over the dinosaurs. The eyes of the lord. Unless someone invented a time machine we know that no humans were alive at that point in time when the dinosaurs were alive. The only mammals back then were very small and more like a mouse then a man.

 

[joshua 1 9]

I'm not going anywhere.

I'll answer any relevant question put to me. You won't find me running from them.

Because people do not ask you fifty million, billion, quadrillion questions continually.

 

[doubtingmerle]

That is what evolutions have to resort to when they can not produce any artifacts or any real evidence. They draw a picture and try to pass off a product of their imagination as evidence. The conclusion is my evidence if fake so your evidence must be fake also. People know that they are not creditable so that is all the evidence they need to claim that no one is creditable.

Oh for crying out loud! Are you serious?

I was not trying to pass off my picture of a dog on a motorcycle as evidence that dogs ride motorcycles!!!!!!

Hello?

And I certainly was not saying that since the dog on the motorcycle was fake, that therefore any picture I want to be fake is fake.

Now if you want to claim this picture of footprints shows that humans and dinosaurs lived together, how do you know this rock is not a fake? The person who owns this rock has been caught faking these things multiple times.

 

[SteveB28]

The foot prints look human but they are not human. Because they do not follow the pattern of humans. Right now this is an unknown. Some people believe that the footprints were made by an angel that was assigned by God to watch over the dinosaurs.

Some people believe that pixies live at the bottom of their gardens.
Some people believe that aliens abduct them in the night.
Some people believe that Donald Trump will be the next president of the USA.

Some people believe in a variety of insane nonsense.........




.

 

[doubtingmerle]

Because people do not ask you fifty million, billion, quadrillion questions continually.

Ok, but when you come here and tell us we cannot tie our shoes, or that you have the ability to stop it from raining every time you ask, or that a rock that has never had a lab report written about it overrides all the accumulated knowledge of geology, then yes, we might have a million, billion quadrillion questions (plus or minus a million, billion, quadrillion).

 

[doubtingmerle]

The foot prints look human but they are not human. Because they do not follow the pattern of humans. Right now this is an unknown. Some people believe that the footprints were made by an angel that was assigned by God to watch over the dinosaurs. The eyes of the lord. Unless someone invented a time machine we know that no humans were alive at that point in time when the dinosaurs were alive. The only mammals back then were very small and more like a mouse then a man.

Do me a favor. Could you make a follow up to the Megan Fox video? I haven't laughed so hard in a long time. --https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32mxZxv3dYM

 

[joshua 1 9]

Do me a favor. Could you make a follow up to the Megan Fox video? I haven't laughed so hard in a long time. --https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32mxZxv3dYM

Life requires basic building blocks. Little girls play with dolls that are fully formed and all they have to do is comb their hair and put a dress on them. Little boys play with legos and they learn how to build things with the basic building blocks of life. Of course you have GI Joe toys also, but that is a different story.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Ok, but when you come here and tell us we cannot tie our shoes, or that you have the ability to stop it from raining every time you ask, or that a rock that has never had a lab report written about it overrides all the accumulated knowledge of geology, then yes, we might have a million, billion quadrillion questions (plus or minus a million, billion, quadrillion).

Every Sunday in Church we say: "Thy Will Be Done, Thy Kingdom Come". The very, very, very first thing we need to learn about God is that He is not a Genie in a Bottle. We need to learn how to do things HIS way. We serve Him He does not Serve Us. IF you do not understand this, then you are not going to understand anything about God.

 

[Jimmy D]

Every Sunday in Church we say: "Thy Will Be Done, Thy Kingdom Come". The very, very, very first thing we need to learn about God is that He is not a Genie in a Bottle. We need to learn how to do things HIS way. We serve Him He does not Serve Us. IF you do not understand this, then you are not going to understand anything about God.

*Apart from when he's interfering complex weather patterns to improve your picnic.