Hi there,
So, let's just say you are created by God and you are on Earth and you have a number of choices of mate. Suppose you choose a mate. Suppose you want to win this mate and its really important to you. Suppose that you have to compete for a mate and the nearest contest is ready to affirm a quicker mating than you. Rather than declare that you will affirm a quicker mating (than a quicker mating), you affirm that the most desired mate will come to you. Then there is no contest, because your contest cannot tell whom it was that you thought would come to you (and so therefore cannot directly compete).
If your mate comes to you, and you are happy with the choice, there is actually no way to say "it was because of this specific mutation". There is simply no way to tell what the mating was based on. If this happens repeatedly, from generation to generation, eventually the need or desire to understand what, how and where something was evolved, before it came to need or want a mate. The whole question of Evolution is moot.
This is in principle para-reversal: if mates can't be stopped choosing their own mate, the precise timing, strength and character of the mating, is down to the future generation to define - it is not up for debate, because the mystery of the previous generation has been received and accepted. There is no forecasting from a mystery, anything but a bigger mystery. Evolution is basically selling a lie, that if you just know enough connections between now and the past, you will have enough to describe the nature of the species, from here to fore.
This even still, is not remarkable: but to the mate and her choice, as regards those that have faith in principle in their offspring. The inspiration is the children. The children themselves are keenly aware of what it is that is expected of them, for they also are faced with the dilemma of what the generation after them will take to be inspiration. They neither will understand the mystery that takes hold of them, until they see the inspiration in their children. They will need to identify one past from another, but not one Evolution from another, because the heart of their commitment, does not need adulteration to fit a premised pace - toward the much denied telos of Evolution, which is nothing.
If you give in, because the inspiration is right - you are beyond needing Evolution, but commended to contrast with it, you are easily and lightly the Lord's (how ever He wants to define that).
So, let's just say you are created by God and you are on Earth and you have a number of choices of mate. Suppose you choose a mate. Suppose you want to win this mate and its really important to you. Suppose that you have to compete for a mate and the nearest contest is ready to affirm a quicker mating than you. Rather than declare that you will affirm a quicker mating (than a quicker mating), you affirm that the most desired mate will come to you. Then there is no contest, because your contest cannot tell whom it was that you thought would come to you (and so therefore cannot directly compete).
If your mate comes to you, and you are happy with the choice, there is actually no way to say "it was because of this specific mutation". There is simply no way to tell what the mating was based on. If this happens repeatedly, from generation to generation, eventually the need or desire to understand what, how and where something was evolved, before it came to need or want a mate. The whole question of Evolution is moot.
This is in principle para-reversal: if mates can't be stopped choosing their own mate, the precise timing, strength and character of the mating, is down to the future generation to define - it is not up for debate, because the mystery of the previous generation has been received and accepted. There is no forecasting from a mystery, anything but a bigger mystery. Evolution is basically selling a lie, that if you just know enough connections between now and the past, you will have enough to describe the nature of the species, from here to fore.
This even still, is not remarkable: but to the mate and her choice, as regards those that have faith in principle in their offspring. The inspiration is the children. The children themselves are keenly aware of what it is that is expected of them, for they also are faced with the dilemma of what the generation after them will take to be inspiration. They neither will understand the mystery that takes hold of them, until they see the inspiration in their children. They will need to identify one past from another, but not one Evolution from another, because the heart of their commitment, does not need adulteration to fit a premised pace - toward the much denied telos of Evolution, which is nothing.
If you give in, because the inspiration is right - you are beyond needing Evolution, but commended to contrast with it, you are easily and lightly the Lord's (how ever He wants to define that).
