• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

LDS teachings on God

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,955
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,104.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Okay, now where were we?

only begotten .................................................. ........................325 creed - "begotten before all worlds"
Heb 7:28 Oath of the Father - .........................................................under Bishop of Rome as Pontifex maximus
"Thou art my Son, this day I have begotten thee." ............................... became "eternally begotten"

Here I would refer you to the first chapter of John...in particular
Joh 1:3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

Obviously, if this verse is true, then the Son would have had to have been begotten "before all worlds". Perhaps "eternally begotten" might be overstated...I would say, instead, "begotten in eternity"...

John 15:16 Pray/ask the Father in the name of Jesus Christ .......................... Pray to Son or Mary

I don't see a lot of difference between praying to the Father or to the Son, as they are ONE...I can't speak for others, but when I pray, I don't really think a lot about whether I am directing my prayer to some specific part of the Godhead. Praying 'in the name of Jesus'...why would we do that, unless we believe that Jesus has the power to hear and answer our prayers?

Now, as to praying to Mary...you do know that is a Roman Catholic thing, yes?
Even Episcopalians do not believe that Mary has the power to hear or to answer prayers.

You certainly do know that these days, there are a great many mainstream Christians who are not Catholic?

Holy Ghost ...................................................................................... Holy Ghost - not declared
Matt 12:32 And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, ...... co-substantial in Nicean Creed - oops!
it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, .............Constantinople 381 A.D.- ................................................................................................declared as co-equal & one substance
it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come............... with the Son ...............................................................................................................(blasphemy against HG?)

Did not Jesus, from the cross, say "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do?" By so doing, He fulfilled this saying...

Baptize in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.
Descended upon Jesus in form of dove in River Jordan ...............sprinkle sinless infants with "holy water" salted ...............................................................................................like in pagan roman holy water

Prophets/Apostles/Bishops, etc.....................................vicarius filii dei (666) in Donation of Constantine until ruled ........................................................................................a fake (fallible?)

No offense, but I'm not sure that anyone who follows Joseph Smith ought to be using the "f" word (fake) in reference to any other religious sect's leaders.
Remember those three fingers pointing back at you?

Jesus: "call no man Father" Matt 23:9, John 17:11......................"pope" from popa or literally daddy, father; "holy father"
John 14:30 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: .............. dark ages, inquisitions, crusades against "heretics"

Who were these "heretics" do you think?

for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me. ...........who made claim to Jesus' name
"You shall know them by their fruits" Matt 7:15-16

Have you considered the many good things that have been done in the name of mainstream Christianity? I'm talking about things like hospitals...for instance have you heard of St. Jude's Children's hospital? Homeless shelters, orphanages, mission houses, food banks and soup kitchens, etc, etc, etc...

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.......Truth suppression, fabrications John 8:44

"Truth suppression, fabrications"??? Seriously?
These are charges that Mormons object to when they are leveled at their own church...perhaps it would be a good idea, then, to refrain from leveling them at others...

Gen 3:3,22.......................................................................................Gen 3:1,4,5
Acts 3:20 And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you:
21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution[restoration] of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.

There has been a great deal of debate as to just what the "times of restitution" might mean.
I can see how LSDs might think of it in terms of their idea of "restoration of the gospel", however, this would mean that Jesus somehow failed in His promise that "the gates of hell" would not prevail against His church, and that God was not capable of preserving His message through every age.

It is my belief that this passage speaks of the end of time, when Jesus will gather His church from the world, and all things will be "made new".



Josh 24:15 And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, ... but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.
"The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling, and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints." Ephesians 1:18.
AMEN

Gen 3:24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

The Matt 28:20 Church


Copyright RevelationTestament.net - license granted for one copy, no reproduction:wav

Your study is a bit overdone, I think...however, it did not lead me to the conclusion that the "restored gospel" is not "another gospel which ye have not received" nor has it given me any confidence in the man, Joseph Smith.
I think you are a very honest and sincere person, who truly believes in his faith and wants to share it...
However, I think you have been mislead.
Perhaps if you could somehow get yourself out of "defense mode", and put as much effort into understanding where mainstream Christians are coming from as you have put into trying to convince others of your own faith...well, maybe you would never "convert"...but maybe you'd learn something you don't already know.

One thing I am absolutely sure of...you will never learn a dadblamed thing from people who think just as you do...
 
Upvote 0

Ran77

Senior Contributor
Mar 18, 2004
17,177
270
Arizona
✟44,152.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Right off, I have to wonder...why are you so obsessed with creeds? Most mainline Christians are familiar with them, but we don't build our faith on them.

Similar to my wondering why our critics are so obsessed with LDS doctrines.


:idea:
 
Upvote 0

drstevej

"The crowd always chooses Barabbas."
In Memory Of
Mar 18, 2003
47,577
27,116
76
Lousianna
✟1,016,631.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What does that mean?
Or was this simply another tactic by you to keep you from having to answer a question?

Paul calls them "more noble" That is a commendation. Thought you'd grasp that without help.
 
Upvote 0

Wryetui

IC XC NIKA
Dec 15, 2014
1,320
255
27
The Carpathian Garden
✟23,170.00
Country
Romania
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Galatians 1:8-9;
8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

Description of Angel Moroni, portrayed by Smith:
Descriptions of the angel Moroni vary. In one of Smith's histories, he described him as an "angel of light" who "had on a loose robe of most exquisite whiteness. It was a whiteness beyond anything earthly I had ever seen .… His hands were naked and his arms also a little above the wrists .… Not only was his robe exceedingly white but his whole person was glorious beyond description".
 
Upvote 0

Theway

Senior Member
Nov 25, 2003
1,581
25
64
California
✟1,874.00
Faith
Paul calls them "more noble" That is a commendation. Thought you'd grasp that without help.
That's not what I asked.
I asked, what was the outcome of using "Paul's method"?

I however knew you grasped that; that's why I called your non sequitur answer, a diversion tactic.
 
Upvote 0

Theway

Senior Member
Nov 25, 2003
1,581
25
64
California
✟1,874.00
Faith
Galatians 1:8-9;
8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

Description of Angel Moroni, portrayed by Smith:
Descriptions of the angel Moroni vary. In one of Smith's histories, he described him as an "angel of light" who "had on a loose robe of most exquisite whiteness. It was a whiteness beyond anything earthly I had ever seen .… His hands were naked and his arms also a little above the wrists .… Not only was his robe exceedingly white but his whole person was glorious beyond description".
Can you explain what your point is here?
 
Upvote 0

Wryetui

IC XC NIKA
Dec 15, 2014
1,320
255
27
The Carpathian Garden
✟23,170.00
Country
Romania
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
My point was asking about if this verses of the Bible in particular doesn't contradict the LDS doctrine. Paul says that we should never trust any other gospel that is preached out to us even if that gospel comes from an angel from the heavens, but there we have Joseph Smith visited by an angel from heaven bringing a new gospel.
 
Upvote 0

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,955
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,104.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Similar to my wondering why our critics are so obsessed with LDS doctrines.


:idea:

LOL...okay, Ran, point taken.
However, at least a creed is fairly short, concise, and easy to understand.
LDS doctrine seems to be spread through many documents, and can be rather difficult to track down.
And it does seem to change, every so often...:confused:
 
Upvote 0

TasteForTruth

Half-truths are lies wearing makeup
Dec 2, 2010
4,799
47
✟24,265.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Does a burning bosom trump changing Scripture with NO MANUSCRIPT evidence as Smith did in Romans 8:30 ... or tossing ot the Song of Solomon from the canon?
I couldn't tell you. My confidence in the Restored Gospel does not rest on a "burning of the bosom."
 
Upvote 0

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,955
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,104.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Galatians 1:8-9;
8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

Description of Angel Moroni, portrayed by Smith:
Descriptions of the angel Moroni vary. In one of Smith's histories, he described him as an "angel of light" who "had on a loose robe of most exquisite whiteness. It was a whiteness beyond anything earthly I had ever seen .… His hands were naked and his arms also a little above the wrists .… Not only was his robe exceedingly white but his whole person was glorious beyond description".

You caught that, did you?
I don't understand it, either.
We were warned not to accept "another gospel"...even if an "angel from heaven" were to preach it to us.
Elsewhere, we are warned that Satan himself is transformed to "an angel of light"

2Co_11:14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
2Co_11:15 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.

How can we know that this was not a clear warning about the LDS church-to-be??

Since I've been involved in these threads, I have met a few Mormons whom I like and admire...I would be very relieved in my mind if someone could convince me that this is not a false church under false teaching brought by a false prophet...
 
Upvote 0

Theway

Senior Member
Nov 25, 2003
1,581
25
64
California
✟1,874.00
Faith
My point was asking about if this verses of the Bible in particular doesn't contradict the LDS doctrine. Paul says that we should never trust any other gospel that is preached out to us even if that gospel comes from an angel from the heavens, but there we have Joseph Smith visited by an angel from heaven bringing a new gospel.

The problem is that this verse contradicts itself.
This is one of those exaggerated rhetoric verses that Paul often likes to use; it is not meant to be taken literally. The definition of an Angel is simply "a messenger". So in one sense both Paul and the Messenger from heaven are both Angels.
I would find it impossible for an all knowing God to send one of His Angels from Heaven with a message, knowing beforehand that Angel was going to lie. That would make God culpable in the lie.
It would then boil down to who you are going to believe...
An Angel sent directly from Heaven?p
Or the mortal Angel who admits that he still sins?
I for one would take the Angel from heaven every time, especially considering that we know Paul is prone to using hyperbole in his message.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BigDaddy4

It's a new season...
Sep 4, 2008
7,452
1,989
Washington
✟255,989.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You caught that, did you?
I don't understand it, either.
We were warned not to accept "another gospel"...even if an "angel from heaven" were to preach it to us.
Elsewhere, we are warned that Satan himself is transformed to "an angel of light"

2Co_11:14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
2Co_11:15 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.

How can we know that this was not a clear warning about the LDS church-to-be??

Since I've been involved in these threads, I have met a few Mormons whom I like and admire...I would be very relieved in my mind if someone could convince me that this is not a false church under false teaching brought by a false prophet...

You should read the "official" first vision account. An excerpt here:

"I kneeled down and began to offer up the desires of my heart to God. I had scarcely done so, when immediately I was seized upon by some power which entirely overcame me, and had such an astonishing influence over me as to bind my tongue so that I could not speak. Thick darkness gathered around me, and it seemed to me for a time as if I were doomed to sudden destruction."

Then all of a sudden a pillar of light appeared.

https://www.lds.org/scriptures/pgp/js-h/1.1-26?lang=eng#0

When you are done reading that, you can compare the discrepancies with the other, non-official, sometimes contradictory and historically inaccurate accounts, both first and second hand.

https://www.lds.org/topics/first-vision-accounts?lang=eng

“For Mormons the First Vision is foundational—God’s declaration, unequivocal and utterly authoritative, of the results of the Great Apostasy and the need for a restoration.” Davis Bitton, Historical Dictionary of Mormonism (Metuchen, New Jersey: Scarecrow Press, 1994), p. 86.

Have fun!
 
Upvote 0

BigDaddy4

It's a new season...
Sep 4, 2008
7,452
1,989
Washington
✟255,989.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The problem is that this verse contradicts itself.
This is one of those exaggerated rhetoric verses that Paul often likes to use; it is not meant to be taken literally. The definition of an Angel is simply "a messenger". So in one sense both Paul and the Messenger from heaven are both Angels.
I would find it impossible for an all knowing God to send one of His Angels from Heaven with a message, knowing beforehand that Angel was going to lie. That would make God culpable in the lie.
It would then boil down to who you are going to believe...
An Angel sent directly from Heaven?
Or the mortal Angel who admits that he is still sins?
I for one would take the Angel from heaven every time, especially considering that we know Paul is prone to using hyperbole in his message.

The angel(s) was/were not from God or heaven.
 
Upvote 0

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,955
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,104.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
You should read the "official" first vision account. An excerpt here:

"I kneeled down and began to offer up the desires of my heart to God. I had scarcely done so, when immediately I was seized upon by some power which entirely overcame me, and had such an astonishing influence over me as to bind my tongue so that I could not speak. Thick darkness gathered around me, and it seemed to me for a time as if I were doomed to sudden destruction."

Then all of a sudden a pillar of light appeared.

https://www.lds.org/scriptures/pgp/js-h/1.1-26?lang=eng#0

When you are done reading that, you can compare the discrepancies with the other, non-official, sometimes contradictory and historically inaccurate accounts, both first and second hand.

https://www.lds.org/topics/first-vision-accounts?lang=eng

“For Mormons the First Vision is foundational—God’s declaration, unequivocal and utterly authoritative, of the results of the Great Apostasy and the need for a restoration.” Davis Bitton, Historical Dictionary of Mormonism (Metuchen, New Jersey: Scarecrow Press, 199), p. 86.

Have fun!

:mmh:

Uh...thanks BigDaddy...

That didn't ease my mind a bit...
 
Upvote 0

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,955
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,104.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
The problem is that this verse contradicts itself.
This is one of those exaggerated rhetoric verses that Paul often likes to use; it is not meant to be taken literally. The definition of an Angel is simply "a messenger". So in one sense both Paul and the Messenger from heaven are both Angels.
I would find it impossible for an all knowing God to send one of His Angels from Heaven with a message, knowing beforehand that Iwas going to lie. That would make God culpable in the lie.
It would then boil down to who you are going to believe...
An Angel sent directly from Heaven?
Or the mortal Angel who admits that he is still sins?
I for one would take the Angel from heaven every time, especially considering that we know Paul is prone to using hyperbole in his message.

I think the point Paul was making was that no angel from God was ever going to bring "another gospel"....if such an "angel" appeared, we were to understand that he was misrepresenting himself...
 
Upvote 0

drstevej

"The crowd always chooses Barabbas."
In Memory Of
Mar 18, 2003
47,577
27,116
76
Lousianna
✟1,016,631.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I think the point Paul was making was that no angel from God was ever going to bring "another gospel"....if such an "angel" appeared, we were to understand that he was misrepresenting himself...

Exactly.
 
Upvote 0

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,955
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,104.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
This post details it pretty well, I think.

I remember that post. You were quite vague, as I recall.

Yes...here is your list:

I have a witness, borne of the Holy Ghost, that it is Christ's church once more on the earth
I have found that the promises made by God in the Gospel it teaches are fulfilled in my life, consistently
in a very direct and personal way, it has brought me to a knowledge that God is real and that He knows and loves me
it has been the instrument through which God made known to me important, personal information about my life on earth
the doctrines of the Gospel it teaches bring complete peace to my soul and reconcile with perfection the questions I would raise about my origin, the general purpose of my life and trials, and the meaning of my very existence
it is always listening—through a living prophet—for more of God's word, always expectant that He has yet more to say for my benefit, and that of my family
the Gospel it teaches gives me useful, practical guidance and anchoring in the stormy seas of mortality
I have seen the hand of God made manifest, firsthand, through the priesthood power it claims to wield for God's purposes, including, and primarily, in my own life and in the life of my immediate family
I have seen the works of God made manifest in its doings
the Gospel it teaches yokes me to Christ in real, meaningful ways, not sparing personal sacrifice


What makes your experiences of these types of things any more valid than mine, or, for that matter, hundreds of thousands of other mainstream Christians who make similar claims?
In fact, how is this so very different from "a burning in the bosom"?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.