- Aug 3, 2012
- 29,100
- 28,654
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Really? Because variability coinciding with significant shocks makes perfect sense to me, and I'm surprised that WW2 didn't cause a dip (though it looks like WW1 did). If I may hazard a guess as to why COVID had a more visible impact on these numbers than WW2:It doesn't make sense to me that "life expectancy" should vary on a year-to-year basis at the same time that certain events happen. That's like saying that life expectancy should have dropped during WWII...but it did not. WWII was a known outlier event, as Covid is.
![]()
• United States: life expectancy 1860-2020 | Statista
Both COVID and WW2 killed roughly the same percentage of the US population. Wikipedia puts that figure at 0.39% for WW2. According to worldometer's death toll, it's about 0.35% for COVID. WW2 deaths were spread out a bit more: it was nearly 3 years between Pearl Harbor and VJ Day whereas most COVID deaths were concentrated within the 2 years between Mar 2020 and Mar 2022. Concentrating early deaths is going to have a bigger impact on total life expectancy. TBH, I kind of doubt that this difference is a big factor, but it's something.
I suspect the bigger factor is what was happening with old people. I can't find good data before 1950, but if you look at what was happening from 1950 to about 2010, the life expectancy at age 65 was growing by about 6-12 months every decade, and plateauing by the 2010's. In the early 1940's, there were far more old people at home living longer than there were young people dying overseas - I suspect their numbers were large enough to swamp whatever effect the war would've had on life expectancy. By the time COVID hit, that was no longer the case.
Upvote
0