KJVO and belief in a Flat Earth

[Dan61861]

It doesn't even meet your own standards.

I've done no such thing.

You indeed did!

In Christ
Daniel

 

[Hammster]

You indeed did!

In Christ
Daniel

Please show me where.

 

[Dan61861]

Please show me where.

I already have, read the thread.

In Christ
Daniel

 

[Hammster]

I already have, read the thread.

In Christ
Daniel

Well, I know what I've said, and it isn't what you've accused me of. So as of now, it's unsubstantiated.

 

[Dan61861]

Well, I know what I've said, and it isn't what you've accused me of. So as of now, it's unsubstantiated.

Are you saying that you did not support 98"s premise that the KJV has errors?

If you want, I can go back and show it again.

In Christ
Daniel

 

[Hammster]

Are you saying that you did not support 98"s premise that the KJV has errors?

If you want, I can go back and show it again.

In Christ
Daniel

I agreed with him. But it's not like he came up with something I had never heard before.

 

[Dan61861]

I agreed with him. But it's not like he came up with something I had never heard before.

So, let me get this straight. You said it is The Bible. It has errors.

 

[Dan61861]

I agreed with him. But it's not like he came up with something I had never heard before.

Let all men be a liar, Let God be true!

In Christ
Daniel

 

[Dan61861]

Let's handle this a different way. Explain to me why the Scripture we are discussing is in error. Show me the error I fail to see.

In Christ
Daniel

 

[Hammster]

So, let me get this straight. You said it is The Bible. It has errors.

There are errors in the translation. I gave one example. Does that mean it cannot be understood correctly? No. But it does show that it's not "perfect translation".

 

[Hammster]

Let all men be a liar, Let God be true!

In Christ
Daniel

Is there a point to this post?

 

[Dan61861]

Is there a point to this post?

Sure, it's our understanding that is flawed...not God's Word.

In Christ
Daniel

 

[Hammster]

Sure, it's our understanding that is flawed...not God's Word.

In Christ
Daniel

Okay.

 

[Dan61861]

There are errors in the translation. I gave one example. Does that mean it cannot be understood correctly? No. But it does show that it's not "perfect translation".

Again, enlighten me...explain the error.

In Christ
Daniel

 

[Hammster]

Again, enlighten me...explain the error.

In Christ
Daniel

Since you've already engaged me on this point, and you've seemingly read through the thread, why are you demanding to be enlightened?

 

[Dan61861]

Since you've already engaged me on this point, and you've seemingly read through the thread, why are you demanding to be enlightened?

So you can't defend your position? Oops is all you have? You see, I am subject to the word of God, the Word of God is subject to you!

When did God come down and give you the authority to determine what is correct and what is in error?

You my friend, place the Bible on the same plain as the JW Bible. After all, they are both flawed.

In Christ
Daniel

 

[Hammster]

So you can't defend your position? Oops is all you have? You see, I am subject to the word of God, the Word of God is subject to you!

When did God come down and give you the authority to determine what is correct and what is in error?

You my friend, place the Bible on the same plain as the JW Bible. After all, they are both flawed.

In Christ
Daniel

Are you sure a personal attack is the way to go,

 

[twin1954]

I use the KJV almost exclusively but to assert that it is without mistranslations and is without the bias of the translators is willful ignorance. I do not believe that here are better translations out there but that the KJV is one of many. The Word of God is the Word of God but it must be understood that a translation is just that a translation. God doesn't speak in exclusively English mush less Old English.

 

[Dan61861]

Are you sure a personal attack is the way to go,

I haven't attacked you, I understand you are a moderator, Yet I stand firm, there are no flaws in the word of God!

Ban me if you wish, it is entirely up to you.

You have in fact said it is flawed...I have not... I say I am flawed!

In Christ
Daniel

 

[Hammster]

I use the KJV almost exclusively but to assert that it is without mistranslations and is without the bias of the translators is willful ignorance. I do not believe that here are better translations out there but that the KJV is one of many. The Word of God is the Word of God but it must be understood that a translation is just that a translation. God doesn't speak in exclusively English mush less Old English.

I agree. Well, not the use of it part.