• Welcome to Christian Forums
  1. Welcome to Christian Forums, a forum to discuss Christianity in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  2. The forums in the Christian Congregations category are now open only to Christian members. Please review our current Faith Groups list for information on which faith groups are considered to be Christian faiths. Christian members please remember to read the Statement of Purpose threads for each forum within Christian Congregations before posting in the forum.

KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

Discussion in 'Christian History' started by KingJamesVersionBibleOnly, Feb 12, 2018.

  1. KingJamesVersionBibleOnly

    KingJamesVersionBibleOnly New Member

    42
    +40
    United States
    Baptist
    Single
    A KING JAMES VERSION SERMON:

    - Hebrews 4:12 (KJV)
    - Psalm 12:6-7 (KJV)


    Notice the word "preserve", meaning God's word is already present in our times.

    - Galatians 1:6-7 (of 1:1-12) (KJV)

    Notice "of Christ", meaning sadly there are trying Christians attracted by the overwhelming affection of Christ, only to be misled by a Gospel that is not "of Christ"

    - 2 Corinthians 11:3-4 (KJV)

    Scriptural changes differing in meaning broadly spread through the many so called, "modern English Bible Translations" published since the King James Version Bible (KJV) or its birth in 1611 as the Authorized Version (AV).

    Here is our History:
    The Authorized Version: Translated from the Textus Receptus and finished in 1611; Protestant Reformation for Christian believers with beliefs protestant to the Roman Catholic Church; Later revised as the King James Version Bible.


    The MOST respected Bible, standing out as a strong spiritual asset.
    The one and only true word of God (in the English Language).
    The Holy Bible.


    - Proverbs 30:5-6 (KJV)

    Pre 1611 (Old Testament):
    Was known to be in the Hebrew Language.


    Pre 1611 (New Testament):
    Before year 1611, The New Testament was present on earth in the Greek language; in texts known as the Textus Receptus, Yet, not yet translated into the English Language.

    ...............................................................

    Pre 1611 English Bible translations (To solve confusion):
    These books were not known to be as spiritually profitable, but are very evident that the puritan reformer group in their day were not happy with Catholicism and the Roman Catholic Church, desperate and determined for liberty in faith.
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2018
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • List
    We teamed up with Faith Counseling. Can they help you today?
  2. CallofChrist

    CallofChrist Blessed Supporter

    87
    +85
    United States
    Christian
    Single


    This debate presents both sides of the issue
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2018
  3. Ancient of Days

    Ancient of Days Well-Known Member Supporter

    +749
    United States
    Christian
    Married
    US-Constitution
     
  4. Ancient of Days

    Ancient of Days Well-Known Member Supporter

    +749
    United States
    Christian
    Married
    US-Constitution
     
  5. Ancient of Days

    Ancient of Days Well-Known Member Supporter

    +749
    United States
    Christian
    Married
    US-Constitution
     
  6. Ancient of Days

    Ancient of Days Well-Known Member Supporter

    +749
    United States
    Christian
    Married
    US-Constitution
     
  7. Ancient of Days

    Ancient of Days Well-Known Member Supporter

    +749
    United States
    Christian
    Married
    US-Constitution
     
  8. Ancient of Days

    Ancient of Days Well-Known Member Supporter

    +749
    United States
    Christian
    Married
    US-Constitution
     
  9. Ancient of Days

    Ancient of Days Well-Known Member Supporter

    +749
    United States
    Christian
    Married
    US-Constitution
     
  10. ViaCrucis

    ViaCrucis Evangelical Catholic of the Augsburg Confession

    +14,190
    United States
    Lutheran
    In Relationship
    US-Others
    William Tyndale and Myles Coverdale would like to have a word with you.

    -CryptoLutheran
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • List
  11. ViaCrucis

    ViaCrucis Evangelical Catholic of the Augsburg Confession

    +14,190
    United States
    Lutheran
    In Relationship
    US-Others
  12. Ancient of Days

    Ancient of Days Well-Known Member Supporter

    +749
    United States
    Christian
    Married
    US-Constitution
    ^ By the time that guy realizes he was wrong it will be to late. Instead of making it his personal mission in life to attack Sam Gipp and set him self up as a self imposed martyr he should have followed the example set forth in Acts.

    38 And now I say unto you, Refrain from these men, and let them alone: for if this counsel or this work be of men, it will come to nought:

    39 But if it be of God, ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against God.

    Just by listening to his videos one can tell its just a personal vendetta and not about "helping anyone"
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2018
  13. CallofChrist

    CallofChrist Blessed Supporter

    87
    +85
    United States
    Christian
    Single
    WOW! Inferring that Dr James White is lost and that he doesn't care about anyone.... sounds like YOU have a personal vendetta . Ad Hominem attacks are just in poor taste and are a fallacy. Let people speak for themselves.
     
  14. brinny

    brinny everlovin' shiner of light in dark places Supporter

    +101,491
    Non-Denom
    Private
    US-Constitution
    As you say, let people speak for themselves.

    Apparently not everyone agrees with James White.
     
  15. CallofChrist

    CallofChrist Blessed Supporter

    87
    +85
    United States
    Christian
    Single
    Nor do they have to.
     
  16. brinny

    brinny everlovin' shiner of light in dark places Supporter

    +101,491
    Non-Denom
    Private
    US-Constitution
    I agree.

    Nice meeting you CallofChrist.
     
  17. ViaCrucis

    ViaCrucis Evangelical Catholic of the Augsburg Confession

    +14,190
    United States
    Lutheran
    In Relationship
    US-Others
    I know for a fact that there's a lot of things I disagree with James White about. But his series of videos here are a very good refutation of KJV-onlyism.

    Don't like James White? Okay, it's not hard to refute KJV-onlyism, it requires very little effort.

    For example the simple fact that the KJV of 1611 and today's KJV, the Oxford 1769 revision, have material differences. KJV-onlyists tend to like to say the only differences are type face and punctuation, but they aren't. There are real, substantial differences between the 1611 and the 1769.

    Let's compare shall we?

    The 1611 reading of 1 Corinthians 4:9 reads,

    "For I thinke that God hath set forth vs the Apostles last, as it were approued to death. For wee are made a spectacle vnto the world, and to Angels, and to men."

    The 1769 reading,

    "For I think that God hath set forth us the apostles last, as it were appointed to death: for we are made a spectacle unto the world, and to angels, and to men."

    1611 of Psalm 69:32,

    "The humble shall see this, and be glad: and your heart shall liue that seeke good."

    1769 says,

    "The humble shall see this, and be glad: and your heart shall live that seek God."

    Those are material, substantial differences. And those aren't the only ones.

    Don't believe me? Feel free to look it up yourself. You can find an online, searchable version of the 1611 right here: King James Bible

    -CryptoLutheran
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • List
  18. Ancient of Days

    Ancient of Days Well-Known Member Supporter

    +749
    United States
    Christian
    Married
    US-Constitution
    I didn't infer he was lost, I SAID he is WRONG. Big difference. Stating a belief and a Ad Hominem attack are two different things. You are getting quite emotional and are clearly twisting my words to draw an irrational and untrue conclusion.
     
  19. CallofChrist

    CallofChrist Blessed Supporter

    87
    +85
    United States
    Christian
    Single
    I'm not getting emotional at all.
     
  20. Rubiks

    Rubiks armchair linguist

    +1,876
    United States
    Christian
    Single
    The King James Version belongs in the trash. It has severely outdated language and is not based on the original manuscripts.
     
Loading...