In the first place I would not call parents' choice not to strike their children a policy, any more than I would the opposite - using corporal punishment. They are just cultural norms.
I disagree. The idea that corporal punishment is against the law in some places especially now in the West is law and policy. Someone that comes to our society from which corporal punishment was a cultural norm can no longer practice their beliefs. So it seems parental choices and beliefs about how to bring up kids has been usurped by the State.
When the State infringes on personal and private affairs of family and belief then we have to ask whether we really have freedoms. So it seems however society sees child rearing and discipline it is now dictated by the State and its agents and thats not a good thing. When one form of dicipline is denied that usually means an alternative has been pushed instead which can be just as bad.
Society has to be on the same page when it comes to child rearing. You can't have families bringing up kids one way and then the State and its agents through our institutions such as schools teach another way. It just contradicts things and causes chaos in which the State being the greater power will always win.
Secondly there is no justification for concluding that any breakdown in general behaviour (which has never been shown in any period) is a result of parents not using corporal punishment.
Once again I am not saying that the breakdown in behaviour is the result of not using corporal punishment. Corporal punishment though wrong did provide discipline. It did stop a lot of bad behaviour within schools just by the fact that many were fearful of the consequences. I guess a bit like people fearful of the death penalty for murder or young people fearful of jail for doing wrong.
So that in itself shows that 'not having corporal punishment' will lead to some breakdown in behaviour'.
The point I was making is that yes corporal punishment (CP) was abusive but the fact is we needed some sufficent disciplinary method with the same weight as CP to be effective. Whether that weight is by fear of consequences or the instilling of greater respect through a strong and united belief and morality about how we raise our kids.
But this has not happened. We have outlawed corporal punishment but have not replaced it with any effective disciplinary method and as a result kids are becoming unruley which is evidenced in the big increase in student misbehaviour and juvenile delinguency. But also in how kids are disrespecting their parents.
I attribute this is a combination of the breakdown of the family which has been caused by the redefining of marriage, family and parental roles which is linked to the general progressive ideas about sex, gender, race and the rise of individual rights based identity politics which puts the individual and group above the rights of families and communities.
It is not absurd to use other effective means to chastise children.
I agree, but I wasn't saying that 'its absurd to use other diciplinary methods'. I was saying its absurd to get rid of corporal punishment and then replace it with nothing or even something that promotes disrespect and the very behaviour we are trying to stop as has been done in our institutions (schools) which eventually filter down to families and in general society.
I agree that the use of effective means to chastise children is by no means absurd and is vitally needed. But the question is what is regarded as effective. The word chastise means 'rebukes or reprimands severely' so whatever the discipline is it has to be something that is going to clearly state that certain behaviour is wrong and needs to stop and that this will require some harsh measures that hold the person accountable.
But at present there is nothing like that. Do gooders have pushed the softly, softly approach based on all these progressive academic ideas associated with Critical theories which are actually undermining discipline by injecting rights over all else. Rights according to their ideological beliefs about human nature.
Under this thinking making harsh discipline seem like oppression or abusive. We know this ideology doesn't work it just puts kids in cotton wool away from the realities of lifes lessons and cultivates disrespect for authority.