KHouse

[leoji]

Here is a site with some GREAT articals on Physics and God. They are written by a "Christian Physicist"

www.khouse.org

(edit - sorry need 15 posts to put a link in a post)

Please comment here on your opinions of the articals

 

[Tenacious-D]

Here is a site with some GREAT articals on Physics and God. They are written by a "Christian Physicist"

w w w . khouse . org

(edit - sorry need 15 posts to put a link in a post)

Please comment here on your opinions of the articals

Where???? All I got was a page for ordering stuff.


**** SPAM ALERT SPAM ALERT ****

 

[leoji]

Tenacious-D,

vbmenu_register("postmenu_10666480", true); Check your PM

 

[leoji]

Nope not a SPAM

I got the 15 posts so here is the link

http://www.khouse.org/articles/technical/19970201-4.html

 

[Tenacious-D]

Nope not a SPAM

I got the 15 posts so here is the link

http://www.khouse.org/articles/technical/19970201-4.html

But it is joke science that belongs in the trash.

 

[leoji]

But it is joke science that belongs in the trash.

Have you read any of the articals ??? They are far from trash and God is glorified and praised in each artical


Please read before you judge

 

[Tenacious-D]

Have you read any of the articals ??? They are far from trash and God is glorified and praised in each artical


Please read before you judge

It's articles by the way.

It is meaningless, nay disgraceful, to praise God whilst lying. Those articles are full of lies and 'fake' science written by buffoons. My question is did you read them?

 

[leoji]

It's articles by the way.

It is meaningless, nay disgraceful, to praise God whilst lying. Those articles are full of lies and 'fake' science written by buffoons. My question is did you read them?

Troll Elsewhere please

 

[Tenacious-D]

Troll Elsewhere please

You are the one trolling by posting illiterate garbage pretending to be science on the Physical Sciences board. This board is for science not quackery like you posted and obviously believed just because they praised the Lord. They can praise all they want but they are still cranks.

Go post this in the Creationist only board where other crank science is tolerated.

 

[leoji]

Then please tell me specifically what have you read on the site that is "illiterate garbage”



Be specific please

 

[leoji]

Just a note on the Author, This is his web= resume from his personal web site

LAMBERT T. DOLPHIN
Physicist




I received an AB degree with high honors in physics and distinction in mathematics from San Diego State University in June 1954. After two years of graduate study in Physics and Electrical Engineering at Stanford University, (1954-1956), I joined the staff of SRI International (formerly Stanford Research Institute), in Menlo Park, California where I remained almost continuously for the next 30 years. I left my position at SRI as a Senior Research Physicist in 1987 to pursue small-scale independent geophysical consulting services, and to devote the bulk of my time to Bible teaching, writing and Christian counseling.

Some of the areas of my professional and personal experience and interest include the following:

• Auroral radar clutter, meteor trail communication, lunar radar reflections.
• Ionospheric physics and radio propagation studies
• Natural and artificial ionospheric effects
• Rocket launch and re-entry trail phenomenology
• Over-the-Horizon radar development
• Radar and communications effects from high altitude nuclear explosions
• Very high RF power generation by spark gap switching techniques
• Ball lightning and Nikola Tesla studies
• Electromagnetic propagation in the earth
• Development of ground penetrating radar (GPR) systems
• Electrical and gravity methods in geophysics
• Electrical methods for underwater detection and location
• High frequency seismic sounding for archaeology and geophysics
• Computer conference on unusual geological features on Mars
• Geophysical methods applied to archaeology: Egypt, Israel, and the US
• Tomographic HF methods for location of plastic utility pipes
• Measurements-while-drilling (MWD) technology
• Geophysical methods for tunneling machine technology
• Non-constancy of the velocity of light investigation
• Search for legendary treasures using geophysical methods

 

[Tenacious-D]

Never even got a PhD. Tut tut tut. He's an electrical engineer by profession, not exactly a group known for their physics acumen.

 

[Locrian]

Then please tell me specifically what have you read on the site that is "illiterate garbage”

I dunno about illiterate garbage, but the articles are deceptive and not scientifically accurate. Take the article Quantum Physics: The Boundries of Reality. The article - as most do - begins with a reasonable if uneducated history of the science.

However, as soon as the Bible is added, it jumps off the deep end.

The ancient Hebrew scholar Nachmonides, writing in the 12th century, concluded from his studies of the text of Genesis that the universe has ten dimensions: that four are knowable and six are beyond our knowing.

Particle physicists today have also concluded that we live in ten dimensions. Three spatial dimensions and time are directly discernible and measurable. The remaining six are "curled" in less than the Planck length (10-33 centimeters) and thus are only inferable by indirect means

There is no evidence that there are ten dimensions. None. Zero. And yet, he claims Particle physicists have concluded we have. As proof, he cites a popular science book; it is probably a misquote, and most certainly not a view of the scientific community.

He goes on to make baseless comparisons between thermodynamics and Genesis. He provides no reason to believe his comparisons are correct except, well, that they sound good.

Take another article: Physics and the History of Hyperspace. It starts out trivially enough, but his emphasis on the Riemann equations is overstated; if they were all he made out to be, I'd be using them instead of Maxwell's formulation. From there, he is back to his same old mistakes.

Ten (dimensions) is a reasonable number to make our physics simple.

No, it isn't. Ten dimensions does not simplify anything, and anyone who has looked closely at string physics can attest to that. String and brane hypothesis currently suggest little and have never been shown to predict observables.

From there he goes into meandering, meaningless nonsense that can be summed up as suggesting we are in one universe and god is in another. Gee, that's never been mentioned before.

These articles are cute (if not entirely accurate) history lessons. However, by linking the Christian religion to scientific hypothesis that haven't been proven in any regime, and by making nonsensical logical assumptions, he does the religion more harm than good.

 

[Andy Broadley]

Sounds a bit too heavy for my tastes. I'll stick to Encyclopedia Galactica