Zackmeister
Just a poor sinner
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Do the math. 1200fps is about 800mph.Zackmeister said:800 mph? Now you are violating good physics principles. More like 1200 fps or less.
You are wrong. I can tell you from Years of Martial Arts Training, Military Experience, as a Current Street Cop and licensed paramedic, that you have absolutely no concept of how deadly a knife or baseball attack can be.Absolute nonsense which has been refuted a thousand times. Handgun lethality is way beyond a bat or knife. Any fool knows this.
How much Law Enforcement experience do you have, How Much Military Experience, How much experience do you have with firearms in general, how much hand to hand training do you have?And read what I said. The person running away in knife attacks if often the attacker due to the recoil at the mess of it all. Another well known phenomena oft studied.
It is far easier to kill with a handgun than a knife, period. To say different shows a complete unfamiliarity with physics, weapons in general and the statistics.
I seem to be batting a thousand tonight. I stand corrected again. Funny thing is I knew better in both instances. I'm sorry.Tachocline said:Do the math. 1200fps is about 800mph.
Geeez. How old are you?
This is a single example, reminds me of magic bullets and the grassy knoll in Dealey Plaza.Stat101 said:It's all about shot placement. I read an article where a state trooper shot a man 5 times with a 357 mag and he lived. The man shot the trooper with a 22 one time and killed the trooper. Want to know why, the bullet hit the trooper under the arm, avoiding his vest and struck his aorta. Another example a BG (Bad guy ) shot at a cop with an ak-47. Fired all thirty rounds and only hit the officer twice.
Funny thing is you went ahead anyway. Have a beer or something.Zackmeister said:I seem to be batting a thousand tonight. I stand corrected again. Funny thing is I knew better in both instances. I'm sorry.![]()
Stat101 said:We do it more because there are more of us.
Ever hear of Vietnam? How about the Warsaw ghetto uprising?And a handgun in those homes would not have stopped any single one of those events. I think an SS Panzer regiment wouldn't have had too many problems with a few Jews with handguns or some rednecks in Arkansas for that matter either.
Accident TypeI didn't say that. But the average gun owner private citizen probably can't be trusted with a pea shooter never mind a lethal firearm. Look at the stats. Most private gun owners in the States have never had either military training, police training or any civil firearms courses. Incompetents in charge of lethal weapons. Look at all the firearm accidents in the States.
dittomonkey911 said:Deaths Due to Unintentional Injuries, 2000 (Estimates)[size=-1] (Chart compiled by GunCite. Source of data, except as noted, National Safety Council, Injury Facts, 2001 Edition, pp. 8-9, 84) [/size]Accident TypeAge0-45-1415-2425-4445-6465-7475+TotalAll Automobile9001,50010,50013,3009,2002,7004,90043,000Falls70702109501,9001,70011,30016,200Poisoning by solids, liquids60408006,8003,20030050011,700Pedestrian12503007501,3001,4004508505,300Drowning4503507001,2506502302703,900Fires, burns4002602407008005007003,600Suffocation by ingested object10020302504005002,1003,400Firearms20601501901103040600Poisoning by gases, vapors101070120804070400All other causes7004001,1003,0003,2001,6004,50014,500TOTAL2,7002,70013,80026,60019,5007,60024,40097,300
I think that there should be more worry about the culture and circumstances that give rise to such murders. If you deal with the root problem the murder rate will decline. Gun laws inherently target law abiders instead of criminals because they buy their firearms through legal means which can be regulated. Criminals steal their weapons and therefore no law will take them away from them.Tachocline said:Guys it's been fun. I have to go to bed.
By the way, I was playing Devil's Advocate to some extent. I'm not anti-gun, though I do think handguns are a problem in the US. The problem is though there is no practical way of getting rid of the huge excess of them around.
And I think the US also needs to realise that the murder rate is a mirror of gun ownership. That's why I mentioned eggs and omelettes earlier. A consequence of the gun ownership prevalence is that more people are going to be killed whether by accident or the ease of murder because of them. There is no other reason for the disparity of murder rates with say the UK and the US. We are not dealing wit a 5 or 10% difference which could have many root causes, we are talking factors of 3 or 4 which has an obvious cause. It is easier to kill an American because the killer is more likely to be using a more lethal killing weapon, a gun.
Night all.
If you think that Guerilla forces cannot beat an organized army, then it is you who has no concept of military history.I hope your other thinking is better than your military history. To equate the two instances you mention to private citizen gun ownership in the US is specious.
There is one huge difference between the two (no make that two big differences) but I don't think you'll figure them out.
I understand it far better than you do. Singer was binding precedent, the Judge even noted that in his opinion, which you seem not to have read.BTW dittomonkey, wasn't it you speaking authoritatively on Washington state case law in that other thread? You seemed to misunderstand jurisprudence too.