It's standard procedure. I've have 5 so I should know.Don't know where you got your ultrasound, but that's nonsense. None of it is true. No such instructions were given to my ex-wife for either of our kids, and the ultrasound came out just fine.
The "reconnect" explanation isn't going to fly, medically speaking. I don't see that on the insurance forms either. Women who seek abortions KNOW they are pregnant and what it means. A nice little discussion and a brochure will do the trick just in case you think someone doesn't know.The reason is not emotion, but to show the mother that the child is alive. Most of them have managed to detach themselves from that fact. Therefore, the "medical reason" is reconnect the mother with reality. And no insurance pays for an abortion, either, not even one of those "medical concerns for the mother" travesties.
Why would there need to be a picture of an aborted baby? An ultrasound isn't going to show that so why should a brochure? Again...emotion. Geeze.They already are required to give them alternatives to abortions. You'd probably object to a brochure with a picture of an aborted baby, anyway.
The prevention of the child's life. See how easy it is to spin?So the child's death is preferable to adoption by a couple who can't otherwise have children? That's sound reasoning, isn't it? "He's probably going to have a miserable life anyway, so let's just kill him."
Upvote
0