keyarch
Regular Member
I can see and understand your point. But what bothers me is if a ministry is out there promoting a doctrine that is so foundational, it seems like they would want to make sure they are telling people the truth.I once talked to Kent Hovind in person about my debating evolutionists (I know you are not an evolutionist but this deals with debating in general) on this web site. He said many people try to debate him by e-mail. He said he would gladly debate anyone in person but he won't debate anyone via e-mail. One reason being is that he one of the slowest typers out there. Also it was either him or Ken Ham that told me that they didn't see it worth while to doing much debating in an online context when there are so many people out there willing to hear their message openly. It just is more productive.
It seems like they are stuck with a certain interpretation because of the fact that they have promoted it so much, and to change any part of it would be detrimental to their ministry.
Say for instance that AiG came out and said "We have now interpreted the scriptures to say that the universe was created in a different age than the six day creation week where God made earth habitable and created life on it some 6,000 years ago." I for one would applaud them and start supporting thier ministry, but many would probably jump ship.
Upvote
0