- Jul 12, 2007
- 1,405
- 141
- 64
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
We have had Bible studies in our church on justification so much that I am pretty sure I understand it as well as I possibly can. This weekend I ran across the following Facebook post: https://www.facebook.com/schulzcj?fref=ts
‎"The LCMS along with the WELS insisted on the words, that God has not only secured and provided salvation for all, but that God has declared the whole world righteous in Christ Jesus. This they called objective Justification.....By only saying secured and provided salvation the door is open for some cooperation or contributions on the part on man. Good, God has provided it, how do I get it? But by insisting on the term God has DECLARED the whole world righteous, all works or cooperation on mans part are removed." -- WELS Pastor M.F. Bartling, Onalaska, WI (Christian News, October 29, 2012, Vol. 50, No. 42).
Mark and avoid people, mark and avoid. What's being said here is that the entire world as been justified prior to faith -- man is already righteous in God's eyes, man just needs to believe that he's already righteous (J.P. Meyer's Ministers of Christ, Walther's (in)famous Easter sermon, and the heretic Samuel Huber's teachings ). To say otherwise, namely, that the sinner is not justified unless faith be given by God to him/her, is, according to WELS and Bartling as somehow man cooperating with his salvation -- synergism. What? If faith is given by God and as the Apology emphatically states that the sinner is justified before God only by the imputation of faith, then these synergistic accusations are completely unfounded. Mark and avoid, mark and avoid. To my Lutheran, laymen friends, read the Apology in the Lutheran Confessions on justification (Welcome to the Book of Concord) and tell me if you walk away afterwards thinking that the Lutheran Church teaches that the whole world has been justified prior to God-given faith. This "world absolution prior to faith" is philosophical mumbo-jumbo unsupported by Scripture and the Lutheran Confessions. It is Samuel Humber's heretical legacy living on."
So, if I am understanding it correctly - this guy is saying that belief is a work (which it is not, the way Lutherans understand it) Or, if I am misunderstanding, can someone shed light on what he is trying to say? I'm not questioning my education in the area of justification, but am just trying to figure out exactly what the problem is.
‎"The LCMS along with the WELS insisted on the words, that God has not only secured and provided salvation for all, but that God has declared the whole world righteous in Christ Jesus. This they called objective Justification.....By only saying secured and provided salvation the door is open for some cooperation or contributions on the part on man. Good, God has provided it, how do I get it? But by insisting on the term God has DECLARED the whole world righteous, all works or cooperation on mans part are removed." -- WELS Pastor M.F. Bartling, Onalaska, WI (Christian News, October 29, 2012, Vol. 50, No. 42).
Mark and avoid people, mark and avoid. What's being said here is that the entire world as been justified prior to faith -- man is already righteous in God's eyes, man just needs to believe that he's already righteous (J.P. Meyer's Ministers of Christ, Walther's (in)famous Easter sermon, and the heretic Samuel Huber's teachings ). To say otherwise, namely, that the sinner is not justified unless faith be given by God to him/her, is, according to WELS and Bartling as somehow man cooperating with his salvation -- synergism. What? If faith is given by God and as the Apology emphatically states that the sinner is justified before God only by the imputation of faith, then these synergistic accusations are completely unfounded. Mark and avoid, mark and avoid. To my Lutheran, laymen friends, read the Apology in the Lutheran Confessions on justification (Welcome to the Book of Concord) and tell me if you walk away afterwards thinking that the Lutheran Church teaches that the whole world has been justified prior to God-given faith. This "world absolution prior to faith" is philosophical mumbo-jumbo unsupported by Scripture and the Lutheran Confessions. It is Samuel Humber's heretical legacy living on."
So, if I am understanding it correctly - this guy is saying that belief is a work (which it is not, the way Lutherans understand it) Or, if I am misunderstanding, can someone shed light on what he is trying to say? I'm not questioning my education in the area of justification, but am just trying to figure out exactly what the problem is.