Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Justification from eternity is better understood if you understand the biblical covenants.
I can't even see moon's posts...I can only imagine. haha
"...this oneness of vital relationship is in Jesus, not in the earthly nature, which has yet to be changed, and fashioned like Christs glorious body. Adam, we are told, (Rom. 5:14), is the figure of him that was to come. And if there had not been a union of natural life extending to his posterity, his transgression could not have involved them in the condemnation and death that by his offense passed upon all of his undeveloped race. Therefore, as by the offense of one, judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of One, the free gift came upon all men to justification of life. For as by one mans disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of One shall many be made righteous. As in Adam, who is the figure of Christ, God made of one blood [or life] all the nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation, &c., (Acts 22:26), so that eternal life which is begotten and born of God, which was given to the heirs of God in Christ their Head, is one lifea unit, and not a plurality of lives. It was given to them in the Son of God, as the same eternal life which was with the Father, and is the same in all the members of the body of Christ. It is in Christ, and it is Christ. He says, I am the resurrection and the life, (John 11:25). I am the way, the truth, and the life, (John 14:6). I am crucified with Christ; nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me, (Gal. 2:20). For me to live is Christ, and to die is gain, (Phil.1:21). Set your affections on things above, not on things on the earth. For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God. When Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory, (Col. 3:2-4)."
Eph 2:1 And you were dead in the trespasses and sins
2 in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience-
3 among whom we all once lived in the passions of our flesh, carrying out the desires of the body and the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind.
4 But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us,
5 even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ-by grace you have been saved-
6 and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus,
Whenever this comes up I am always drawn to this passage. Basically I think it's saying that yes, we were dead in a temporal sense (after all, we are sinners). It's also says that by nature we were children of wrath. But it doesn't say that we were actually children of wrath.
It's possible that I'm reading too much into this, but if we were children of wrath and then when we were justified temporally this changed, then God's wrath fell upon/was planned for someone whom Christ died for.
However, if we were by nature children of wrath, but not actually children of wrath, this problem is averted.
That probably wasn't nearly as structure as it was in my head, but there you go.
"...As soon as one person becomes surety for another, the debtor is freed and the Surety is accepted. Thus all God’s elect were justified in eternity, as soon as Christ became our Surety (Rom. 8:30)…"
How can it be said of one who is justified in eternity and imputed with the very righteousness of Christ .that they are "none of his" in Romans 8:9 ?
But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.
Unless "None of his"...is a fact - until begotten of the Spirit ?
I like your response. In giving this further thought, I think there is a sense where we can agree with justification from eternity, the same as elect from eternity. It is more justification and election from the Divine perspective, as a part of the omniscience of God. However, I believe it is error to teach that God's elect, though chosen from eternity are at birth automatically regenerated and justified (keeping a Reformed order of salvation in mind). The plan is from eternity but the working out of the plan is in time, according to time of God's choosing. I do believe in a few exceptions, like John the Baptist, who would seem to have been regenerated while in his mother's womb. And God can regenerate and justify infants, especially those whom die in infancy, I just wouldn't consider it the norm. So perhaps it's not as black and white as I first thought. Things always get more complicated when thinking in terms of temporal time and eternity involving a past, present, and future.
JM - Everyone else can see.
And...what they can see is that you, the chief advocate for justification in, and from eternity, simply refuses to respond to the argument at hand which is centred in Rom 8:1 and 8:9.
I can only imagine that you have no defence to my simple enquiry.
It seems the false doctrine you endorse, and propagate, is easily proven false by Rom 8:1 and 8:9.
Neither you, nor any other adherent of justification from eternity has the slightest idea what to do about it, or even how to respond.
We were justified in the purpose of God before the foundation of the world. We were justified in time when the Lord Jesus Christ accomplished our justification and we are made aware of it when we hear the Gospel of our salvation and the Spirit applies it to our hearts. The life and death of Christ isn't applied to us when we believe it was applied to us when God chose to save us.
Yes it is controversial but only because historic Reformed doctrine will not be reformed.You must remember that the reformers came out of Rome and brought with them a whole lot of baggage. Justification by faith rather than through faith and progressive sanctification are just two of them.
Actually we have answered you but you ignore the answers and keep posting nonsense. Why should we continue to give the same answer to the same objection when you will not even recognize that we have given you an answer. Repeating something over and over again does not make it true.JM - Everyone else can see.
And...what they can see is that you, the chief advocate for justification in, and from eternity, simply refuses to respond to the argument at hand which is centred in Rom 8:1 and 8:9.
I can only imagine that you have no defence to my simple enquiry.
It seems the false doctrine you endorse, and propagate, is easily proven false by Rom 8:1 and 8:9.
Neither you, nor any other adherent of justification from eternity has the slightest idea what to do about it, or even how to respond.
"so that eternal life which is begotten and born of God, which was given to the heirs of God in Christ their Head, is one life"
This quote is detrimental to your position also because it endorses the fact that, we can only be begotten when we are, in fact, begotten of the Spirit.
Rom 8:1 and 8:9 speak directly to this issue.
PS - Once again your own quoted support undermines your position.
.
__________________
.
Actually we have answered you but you ignore the answers and keep posting nonsense. Why should we continue to give the same answer to the same objection when you will not even recognize that we have given you an answer. Repeating something over and over again does not make it true.
twin1954 .you know as well as any other person reading this thread that you have failed to answer my objections concerning the false doctrine of justification in, and from eternity.
Then again, maybe I just have no idea what you people are talking about. That, too, is a strong possibility.