Just for final clarification yes, we evolved from monkeys.

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Jesus believed in Adam & Eve.

That's good enough.

When someone's asking a scientific question, that statement is worth absolutely nothing.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

When have you answered any question proposed to you? Prove that apes and monkeys came from Adam and Eve.

No, I asked you the question first: provide evidence that Adam and Eve actually existed.

 

[SteveB28]

When have you answered any question proposed to you? Prove that apes and monkeys came from Adam and Eve.

"Prove" that anything you say should be trusted, when you so blatantly misattribute sources......




.

 

[Commander]

And yet, YOU PRODUCED that evolutionary scientist as a source to supposedly support YOUR case....!!

It has backfired on you and you lack the honesty and humility to acknowledge that....


.

My case is Piltdown Man, Nebraska Man, Neanderthals, Lucy...etc. I can give many more if you really need me to!

 

[AV1611VET]

When someone's asking a scientific question, that statement is worth absolutely nothing.

Does this look like a scientific question to you?

You can't even show that the Biblical Adam and Eve were real.

Do you know the difference between a declarative statement and an interrogative one?

 

[SteveB28]

My case is Piltdown Man, Nebraska Man, Neanderthals, Lucy...etc. I can give many more if you really need me to!

What I would "like" you to do is to address your dishonest use of those sources.....

But you won't do that, will you...? Instead, you will just 'gallop' on to your next pile of.......nonsense......

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Does this look like a scientific question to you?

Do you know the difference between a declarative statement and an interrogative one?

Why should I answer? You don't even care in the slightest. You never do or have shown any hint of caring about having an honest discussion, so why should I answer you?

 

[AV1611VET]

No, I asked you the question first: provide evidence that Adam and Eve actually existed.

Sure.

Most of the marriage ceremony is patterned after Adam & Eve.

For example, God led Eve to Adam; the father leads the bride to the groom.

And before you harp on this, let me ask you:

Can you show me evidence of gravity?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Sure.

Most of the marriage ceremony is patterned after Adam & Eve.

For example, God led Eve to Adam; the father leads the bride to the groom.

And before you harp on this, let me ask you:

Can you show me evidence of gravity?

The question was not directed at you.

 

[AV1611VET]

The question was not directed at you.

So what are you saying?

I don't exist?

 

[Commander]

We have been "answered" with dishonesty. When will you acknowledge that?



.

Yes, we have they are called evolutionary scientist.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

So what are you saying?

I don't exist?

What I am saying is that I would like the question answered by the person I directed it to, which isn't you.

 

[SteveB28]

Yes, we have they are called evolutionary scientist.

Whom YOU choose to quote dishonestly, when it suits.....!

You are not worth the 'ink'........continue to hide from your responsibilities, if you so wish.

Good morning.



.

 

[Commander]

No, I asked you the question first: provide evidence that Adam and Eve actually existed.

You still do not know when you have been answered, do you? How many times have I asked you this question? We all know that there had to be a first biblical man(Adam), and woman(Eve), or none of us would be here.

 

[Commander]

Whom YOU choose to quote dishonestly, when it suits.....!

You are not worth the 'ink'........continue to hide from your responsibilities, if you so wish.

Good morning.



.

I am just quoting the dishonesty of evolutionary scientist!

 

[Commander]

Why should I answer? You don't even care in the slightest. You never do or have shown any hint of caring about having an honest discussion, so why should I answer you?

I have answered you honestly, the problem is that you will not answer any of the questions I have directed to you, now have you?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

You still do not know when you have been answered, do you? How many times have I asked you this question? We all know that there had to be a first biblical man(Adam), and woman(Eve), or none of us would be here.

You have not shown a single piece of evidence that the Biblical Adam and Eve were real. All you have shown is a classic example of post hoc, ergo proptor hoc.
Again, I ask you: can you provide any evidence that the Biblical Adam and Eve were real?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I have answered you honestly, the problem is that you will not answer any of the questions I have directed to you, now have you?

No you haven't! You have never answered honestly in the entirety of this thread or any other thread that I have engaged you on.

 

[SteveB28]

No you haven't! You have never answered honestly in the entirety of this thread or any other thread that I have engaged you on.

You should take heart from the realisation that you are winning the argument. When your opponent has to resort to such blatant dishonesty, he has essentially forfeited the debate to you.......

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

You should take heart from the realisation that you are winning the argument. When your opponent has to resort to such blatant dishonesty, he has essentially forfeited the debate to you.......

Not in his mind. In his mind, he probably thinks he's winning.