Yes yes I know that evolution can't be proven because it doesn't deal in proof.
For the 5th time,
Science - all of science, doesn't deal in proof.
Then please stop using the word fact. A fact is a proof. Since evolution can't be proven then its not,a fact.
Stephen J. Gould answered this objection 30+ years ago.
http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_fact-and-theory.html
>>
Well, evolution
is a theory. It is also
a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts do not go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's, but apples did not suspend themselves in mid-air, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from apelike ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other, yet to be discovered.
Moreover,
"fact" does not mean "absolute certainty." The final proofs of logic and mathematics flow deductively from stated premises and achieve certainty only because they are
not about the empirical world. Evolutionists make no claim for perpetual truth, though creationists often do (and then attack us for a style of argument that they themselves favor).
In science, "fact" can only mean "confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent." I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms.
Here's at fact. Humans and monkeys so not have the same DNA.
This is so vague as to hardly be a coherent though, much less a fact.
- Humans are monkeys in the we, and our fellow apes, are members of the clade
Catarrhini. In light of that fact, your assertions makes no sense.
- Humans and our fellow Catarrhines all have DNA based on the same 4 neucleotides and comprised of the same 64 codons which produce the same 20 amino acids. In light of that fact, your assertion makes no sense.
- No two humans have
exactly the same DNA so we certainly wouldn't expect a human and any Catarrhini to have
exactly the same DNA. In light of that fact, your assertion elicits a "what's your point?".
Another fact Is the ERV insertion is relatively close.
This makes even less sense. What the heck does "the ERV insertion is relatively close" even mean?
Last fact, it still isn't a fact that makes us have a common ancestor because if it did that would be proof. But it can't be proven Therefore it is,not a fact.
Your problem, as I have pointed out before, is your educational background which has left you woefully unprepared to have a scientific discussion using scientific language. Your thinking is too wedded to apologetics for you to think scientifically. Read the excerpt from Gould above. I'd recommend reading the whole essay if you want to be able to communicate more effectively on the topics that are being discussed.