Except that I was looking for NT comment on the 2nd coming as such. When the NT uses it, it is about the Gospel event.
No, the Gospel event is the first coming.
Upvote
0
Except that I was looking for NT comment on the 2nd coming as such. When the NT uses it, it is about the Gospel event.
There are about 25 uses.
The ABS Metzger production is the only Greek composite I know of. All the 5000 copies of things are referrenced there, with priority to (Aleph) A, B, C, D and p46 as the most complete in one place.
Does anyone believe that America figures into this prophecy?
And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem. Zech.12:9
For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city.
Then shall the Lord go forth and fight against those nations, as when he fought in the day of battle.
And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south. Zech.14:2-4
There are about 25 uses.
The ABS Metzger production is the only Greek composite I know of. All the 5000 copies of things are referrenced there, with priority to (Aleph) A, B, C, D and p46 as the most complete in one place.
ch 20+ refers to the Rev of course. Some of us believe the marriage syncs with Eph 5 and was understood to be current to the apostles times, but then at the end of time comes Rev 20, matching Mt24B and is worldwide.
Descriptions vs events. Rev 22:1 mentions living water and uses the language from Zech 14:8. It is not an "event" happening so much as a description of what that age is like. There are descriptions of the Son of Man that are like that.
How can you NOT see two comings? All those passages quoted about the Gospel mix seamlessly with things we normally think of as 2nd coming. There are even some I would say are abuot the DofJ. Striking the shepherd, the betrayal, and the piercing are all used by the NT about the Gospel. The king on the foal is back in ch 9.
Slow down on the peaceful and vanquishing bits. 1, show me 'dwelling peacefully' anywhere in the book, and 2, 2/3 of Israel perish in 14:2-3. They seem to be in close sequence too. It is also the time when living water flows all year round. This is not normal for Judea. I think it is a figure of speech.
2, 2/3 of Israel perish in 14:2-3
It is also the time when living water flows all year round. This is not normal for Judea. I think it is a figure of speech.
Rev 22:1 mentions living water and uses the language from Zech 14:8. It is not an "event" happening so much as a description of what that age is like. There are descriptions of the Son of Man that are like that.
That passage in Zechariah is referring to the destruction of Jerusalem in the first century. The last battle will be Satan going after the church by deceiving all the nations:
"And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog, and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them." -- Rev 20:7-9
The breadth of the earth means the entire earth, the camp of the Saints is the holy temple, and the beloved city is New Jerusalem, both "headquartered" on heavenly mount Sion:
"Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God; And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord: In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit." -- Eph 2:19-22
"But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels, To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect, And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant. . ." -- Heb 12:22-24
"Wherefore also it is contained in the scripture, Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious: and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded. Unto you therefore which believe he is precious: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner," -- 1Pet 2:6-7It is a spiritual war: a war of deception.
.
In my OP I quoted Zech.14:2-4. If as you say that refers to the destruction of Jerusalem in first century, why wasn't such a dynamic event as the Mt. of Olives splitting in half and half going to the north and half going to the south creating a great valley between them ever recorded?
It is figurative language,
Behold the day of the Lord cometh, Zech.14:1
The phrase "in that day" occurs no less than sixteen times in the 12-14 chapters of Zech, signifying the Day of the Lord or as 14:1 says "the day of the Lord cometh", signifying the Day of the Lord, the future period when the Lord will publically manifest His powers in delivering Israel from her foes and establishing her in the promised millenial Kingdom.
They will flee to the valley of the mountians for sanctuary
And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah the king of Judah Zech.14:5
Pretty precise to be figuative.
Behold the day of the Lord cometh, Zech.14:1
The phrase "in that day" occurs no less than sixteen times in the 12-14 chapters of Zech, signifying the Day of the Lord or as 14:1 says "the day of the Lord cometh", signifying the Day of the Lord, the future period when the Lord will publically manifest His powers in delivering Israel from her foes and establishing her in the promised millenial Kingdom.
They will flee to the valley of the mountians for sanctuary
And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah the king of Judah Zech.14:5
Pretty precise to be figuative.
It is figurative language, like most of Zechariah (like most of the prophesies, generally.) For example, would you interpret 13:7 literally? You might, if Christ had not explained it. But now you have no excuse.
By the way, the old testament that Christ and his disciples quoted frequently, the Septuagint (LXX), has this translation for verse 14:3
"And the Lord shall go forth, and fight with those Gentiles as when he fought in the day of war." -- Zec 14:3 LXX
That changes the entire complexion of 14:1-5.
.
"And the Lord shall go forth, and fight with those Gentiles as when he fought in the day of war." -- Zec 14:3 LXX
14:8
And in that day it shall be
That living waters shall flow from Jerusalem,
Half of them toward the eastern sea
And half of them toward the western sea;
In both summer and winter it shall occur.
Living Waters are a present reality in Christ. Christ himself claimed to have fulfilled Zech 14:8 in His earthly Ministry.(Jn 7:38)
We are not still waiting for Zech 14:8 to be fulfilled.
They Did Flee, just as Jesus instructed them to flee when the saw "Jerusalem encompassed by Armies", they fled to Pella in the valley of the mountains.
Literally Fulfilled.
When they fled during the time "Jerusalem was encompassed by Armies" which I'm assuning your referring to 70AD, why history never says a thing about the light diminishing. . .
(v.6,7)........And it shall come to pass in that day, that the light shall not be clear, nor dark: But it shall be one day which shall be known to the Lord, not day nor night: but it shall come to pass, that at evening time it shall be light.
Coupled with the fact that the Mt. of Olives is still in tact to this day, what you'r saying is not the possible senario.
Yet the fact remains that Zech 14:8 is a present day fulfilled reality, in the person of Jesus Christ.
That's a problem for your view.
How do you reconcile it?
How wonderful to see proof that the cleaving in half of the Mt. of Olives will one day be a reality.
Why would God need to put a fault line there in order to cleave the mount of olives in two?
Jesus himself claimed to have fulfilled Zech 14:8 in His earthly ministry.
I get that that is a problem for your view, but ignoring it won't make it go away.