Don't equate eternal life with living forever as contrived by the earthly mind, but knowing our Father that is this life.
and
I love my life that is Christ and thus I lost my old life.
But isn't it that everything we can conceive of as beyond this life is really just extrapolation from our earthly life? When we conceive of everlasting life, all we are doing is juxtaposing it with the earthly life we are trapped in, and we generally juxtapose by creating opposites / binaries:
transient vs. eternal
limited vs. unlimited
empty vs. full
meaningless vs. meaningful
restless vs. at rest
I'm not sure there's anything that we conceive about eternal life that is not either (1) an imagined fullness of some sort of earthly experience / concept or (2) the imagined opposite of some sort of earthly experience / concept.
With regard to (1), think about love. We tend to experience love in bursts, and it is not spread evenly throughout our time here. We do not love evenly. But when we do experience it to a large degree, we tend to find so much joy and truth in it that we perceive it as a little taste of heaven. God is Love, after all. So when we conceive of eternal life, we conceive of it as a fullness of love - a fullness of something that we can only experience in a limited way in our earthly lives.
With regard to (2), consider all the binaries already listed, but especially that of "transient vs. eternal." We have conceived of this concept of 'eternity' only as an opposite of our earthly human experience of 'transience.'
So, the way that I see it, all things that are conceptualized when thinking about eternal life vs. earthly life are only conceptualized from an earthly perspective. If that is the case, how can anyone say that she is in touch with the "eternal" and has become "dead" to the old earthly life? The eternal is dependent on the transient; the everlasting is dependent on the earthly - from our human perspective, at least.
Upvote
0