Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I won't respond to any further goading. Move on.However, know, is not the issue as, heard, be what was expressed:
It would appear if one is able to refer to something, they have indeed heard of it, even if they might not know the thing itself.
But who actually does the former? We can argue all day about whether or not Islamism is a perversion of Islam or the literal application of it, but we can't argue about whether or not Islam is involved. It obviously is.Both denying that extremist Islamist violence has anything to do with, er, Islam and opposing Brexit are, in general terms, progressive causes.
People will state quite frequently that Islamic terrorism/ISIS/whatever has "nothing to do with Islam". Obama has stated outright that ISIS, for example, isn't even actually an Islamic group, and others make claims to similar effect following acts of Islamic terror.But who actually does the former? We can argue all day about whether or not Islamism is a perversion of Islam or the literal application of it, but we can't argue about whether or not Islam is involved. It obviously is.
'Islamic terror has nothing to do with Islam' is an absurd statement, but we all know why the world's leaders toe that line.People will state quite frequently that Islamic terrorism/ISIS/whatever has "nothing to do with Islam". Obama has stated outright that ISIS, for example, isn't even actually an Islamic group, and others make claims to similar effect following acts of Islamic terror.
Almost all of those came from Breivik, interestingly enough. Without him the numbers are comparable, and when you don't focus exclusively on lone wolf attacks (presumably because you think it makes your religion look less dangerous than it is), Islamic terrorism proves to be far deadlier.The report, from the Royal United Services Institute think tank in London, says that 94 people were killed and 260 injured in attacks carried out by right-wing extremists across Europe between the start of 2000 and the end of 2014.
That compares with 16 deaths and 65 injuries caused by religiously inspired lone wolf attacks.
Lone right wing extremists 'kill and harm more people than lone Islamist terrorists'
In some countries in europe she would have been asked to stand down, as calling people nazis, when you are an MP is not allowed . And I have worked in the Uk with immigrants and on one occasion on the bus to an anti -racist demo I wakened up ,as the men ,the Moslem men, were so sexist and threatening ,I was disgusted by myself for being so naive ,.And then ,when we got to London , whole areas taken over by migrants from Moslem countries . There was no room for the locals, and I remember seeing an old lady with a little home made poster begging to be saved from the surrounding immigrants who wanted rid of her . Since then I have recognised the hatred for the local people that is a feature of left politics , while they, the comfortable whites live as far away as possible ,as they do in Sweden .
While thats true, it is important to analyse lone-wolf attacks, from a security perspective, because they are the hardest to prevent.Almost all of those came from Breivik, interestingly enough. Without him the numbers are comparable, and when you don't focus exclusively on lone wolf attacks (presumably because you think it makes your religion look less dangerous than it is), Islamic terrorism proves to be far deadlier.