- Dec 31, 2018
- 25,501
- 9,468
- Country
- Canada
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
As i said... the system
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
As i said... the system
Another example of "regime change" coming back to bite us hard: when we assisted with installing a despot who no reasonable people would tolerate forever. And removing a leader who was much more aligned with western values.Iranians who were fed-up with living under the Shah of Iran...a leader whom the US had supported. Are you famliar with the history of US involvement in Iran's internal politics?
The bible said so.I do recall criticism of Carter being way too hands on and mired in details, reluctant to delegate. But I dont see how these traits are particular Christian. Its not helping me grasp the initial claim that Christian values and success with worldly power are incompatible.
Who expressed such a rule? And again, Teddy Roosevelt criticized Taft. More recently, both Donald Trump and Barack Obama have occasionally spoken out about the policies or actions of their successors.Yes there was. In any event, even if you're just the local school PTA president, it's undignified. It's a bad look to criticize your successor. But it's even more important for a POTUS.
Again, it was unwritten, unspoken, but it was the practice. And I think it was important. You ever notice how when there's a high profile legal case in the news, and the prosecution (the government) loses, they're always quick to say "we respect the decision of the jury"? It's sorta like that. You're reinforcing the fact that we should respect the will of the people, and should respect the process.Who expressed such a rule?
That was a special situation in that they were friends and Roosevelt practically anointed Taft, then Taft went in an unexpected direction with his policies, disappointing Roosevelt and a lot of his followers.And again, Teddy Roosevelt criticized Taft.
As I said, Carter was the first (in the modern era).More recently, both Donald Trump and Barack Obama have occasionally spoken out about the policies or actions of their successors.
Yeah, keep making qualifications. There was no "rule."Again, it was unwritten, unspoken, but it was the practice. And I think it was important. You ever notice how when there's a high profile legal case in the news, and the prosecution (the government) loses, they're always quick to say "we respect the decision of the jury"? It's sorta like that. You're reinforcing the fact that we should respect the will of the people, and should respect the process.
It's similar with the POTUS. He should respect the will of the people and the peaceful transition of power. Not to mention it just looks kind of low class. You and I can criticize any president all day long, but I think a former president should be above that.
That was a special situation in that they were friends and Roosevelt practically anointed Taft, then Taft went in an unexpected direction with his policies, disappointing Roosevelt and a lot of his followers.
As I said, Carter was the first (in the modern era).
I said it was a tradition. Do you know of examples of ex-presidents criticizing sitting presidents between Roosevelt and Carter?Yeah, keep making qualifications. There was no "rule."
Like traditions are worth anything. Tradition was also releasing tax returns and divesting interests in businesses before taking office but look where that is now.I said it was a tradition. Do you know of examples of ex-presidents criticizing sitting presidents between Roosevelt and Carter?
I agree with you. Tradition is good. It is the democracy of the dead. - G.K.C.Like traditions are worth anything. Tradition was also releasing tax returns and divesting interests in businesses before taking office but look where that is now.
Oh. Can you show me where I said that? The thing you agree me with?I agree with you. Tradition is good. It is the democracy of the dead. - G.K.C.
Maybe I misinterpreted your comment. It seemed like you were saying that the traditions of releasing tax returns and divesting business interests were good things to do.Oh. Can you show me where I said that? The thing you agree me with?
Clearly. Read the first sentence of my comment again.Maybe I misinterpreted your comment. It seemed like you were saying that the traditions of releasing tax returns and divesting business interests were good things to do.
I did, but given your second sentence it's confusing. Are you saying we shouldn't have traditions, or are you lamenting the fact that traditions sometimes get abandoned?Clearly. Read the first sentence of my comment again.
Eh, close enough. The answer to this post is "Yes."I did, but given your second sentence it's confusing. Are you saying we shouldn't have traditions, or are you lamenting the fact that traditions sometimes get abandoned?
Via Herbert Hoover @Wikipedia:I said it was a tradition. Do you know of examples of ex-presidents criticizing sitting presidents between Roosevelt and Carter?
As Coolidge, Harding, Wilson, and Taft had all died during the 1920s or early 1930s and Roosevelt died in office, Hoover was the sole living former president from 1933 to 1953. He and his wife lived in Palo Alto until her death in 1944, at which point Hoover began to live permanently at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in New York City. During the 1930s, Hoover increasingly self-identified as a conservative.He closely followed national events after leaving public office, becoming a constant critic of Franklin Roosevelt. In response to continued attacks on his character and presidency, Hoover wrote more than two dozen books, including The Challenge to Liberty (1934), which harshly criticized Roosevelt's New Deal. Hoover described the New Deal's National Recovery Administration and Agricultural Adjustment Administration as "fascistic", and he called the 1933 Banking Act a "move to gigantic socialism".
Okay so Carter wasn't the first, just one of the few. Thank you. I'm always happy to learn when I've been wrong.Via Herbert Hoover @Wikipedia:
Your premise is null.