NicodemusPrime said:
I think you are stretching three sentances a little thin. Last time I checked the rules it said calling other peoples ideas heretical was a no no. You have gone to great lengths to make an example out of her because of a very simple analogy. It is not you place to tell other christians what is acceptable and what is not. Every preacher I have ever heard uses analogies genreously and just becuase you read into them too much doesn't make you right.
I am sorry you found my post offensive. However, if we do not defend orthodoxy, who will? The reason that we have a Christian Only section and it is limited to those who accept the Nicene Creed is BECAUSE there are those who claim to be Christian yet hld to unorthodox, heterodox beliefs . . heterodox means one believes a heresy . .
The Creeds of the Early Church were written SPECIFICALLY to combat Heresy . .
The Apostle's Creed to combat the Heresy of Gnosticism . ..
The Nicene Creed to combat the heresy of Arianism . .
Are you arguing in favor of letting those who claim to be gnostic christians to post here promoting their brand of christianity without pointing out that their brand of christianity is heresy?
Every heresy the Early Church combatted is finding expression today among those who don't even realize it is contrary to Christian belief . .
I cannot call someone a heretic . . but I can point out the heresy inherent in a belief if it is not orthodox . . there is nothing in the rules about that . . otherwise, we could not even have a Christian Only section as there would be no such thing as heresy and we would have an anything goes mentality.
The Trinity is the CORE tenent of the Christian faith . . .one cannot be a Christiain if one does not believe in the Trinity, for to be a Christian is to hold to the belief that God the Son, the 2nd person of the Trinity, became flesh for us, became one of us and died for us . .
Without a proper understanding of the Trinity, one cannot have a proper understanding of Christology . . Who Christ is.
I did not go to great lengths to make an example of a person . . but to speak to a simple analogy that is very faulty and leads one to a wrorng belief regarding the Trinity.
I have not called Rosa a heretic . . her analogy fails because it is intrinsically modalistic . . and that is what I pointed out.
I will defend the responsibility we have to promote a right belief in the Trinity . . doing so does not attack a person (which I did not do), but the idea . .
As OrthodoxyUSA said
These posts have been made to correct an error of oversight... not to play the blame game....
That is absolutely true. Thank you OrthodoxyUSA
It is most definitely the place of every Christianto defend the orthodox faith against heterodox views (ones that promote heresy). So it is indeed my place as it is every orthodox believers place to do so . ..
If I hold to a heretical belief, I sure hope that someone will point it out to me so I can change it!
Peace in Him!