it seems like creationists arn't looking 4 the truth

[tocis]

There is obviously some factual inaccuracy in this verse above so why should we accept that Genesis is factually accurate?

Now "all that's left" is to make the creationists realize that.
Sadly, this "all that's left" is exactly the problem.

 

[tocis]

lol carcio wasn't ape's breeding humans discussed on some other topic u made?

Wasn't that discussed (and debunked as usual) on every thread she ever participated in?

(Now I admit I didn't read each and every one of her thread postings, but from what I did read I definitely get that impression. The nonsensical ape-human-thingie seems to be her personal mantra..)

 

[tocis]

Okay, with both carico and av in this thread, I guess the sanest thing to do is drop out before my brain explodes from reading just the stuff others quoted out of their postings...

...that's the sad thing about ignore lists. Both of them have a first-class place in mine but that doesn't protect me from reading what others quote...

 

[AV1611VET]

Tough. The study of the past can be useful. For example, study of paleoclimates and using the data to predict global environmental trends.

Right --- all that research and all I hears is 'Elninodidit' or 'Laninadidit'.

Or the study of evolutionary trees and it's application to comparative genomics (particularly in areas of medical and agricultural research).

Right --- video games and movies like Jurassic Park.

Science marches onward... whether you like it or not.

To the wrong drummer.

 

[AV1611VET]

I gave you a partial answer, did I not?

I don't know --- I didn't go to that website you posted. I almost never do. Can you answer in your own words?

Would you rather me use the AV1611VET/DAD tactic of ignoring ideas I don't like?

I'd rather you answer the question; but, I get the impression you already have.

To make my point: it's easy to accuse someone of 'private interpretation', isn't it --- but much harder to answer in YOUR own words --- right?

For every finger you point, there's three pointing back, eh?

 

[nvxplorer]

Right --- all that research and all I hears is 'Elninodidit' or 'Laninadidit'.



Right --- video games and movies like Jurassic Park.



To the wrong drummer.

 

[AV1611VET]

Okay, with both carico and av in this thread, I guess the sanest thing to do is drop out...

Ya --- you can always come back and get your G.E.D. later.

...that's the sad thing about ignore lists. Both of them have a first-class place in mine but that doesn't protect me from reading what others quote...

Believe me --- that gate swings both ways!

 

[WingsOfTheNeophyte]

To the wrong drummer.

True

But Christianity is even worse at playing the right tune for science than, anything that is being played now

Imagine the lessons

We will be learning things like

Christian science class

F=MA

The force of God is the acceleration of God * the mass of God

Since the mass of God is infinite, its F=infinity*acceleration

Therefore the force of God is infinite

No, Christians, are defnetly the wrong drummer for science

 

[AV1611VET]

No, Christians, are defnetly the wrong drummer for science

That's because Christianity does not cater to science.

Look at it this way --- follow my logic here:

1. Is God omniscent?
2. Does He know Newton's formula for gravity?
3. Did He give it to us in His Word?
4. Why?

 

[Nathan Poe]

That's because Christianity does not cater to science.

Look at it this way --- follow my logic here:

1. Is God omniscent?
2. Does He know Newton's formula for gravity?
3. Did He give it to us in His Word?
4. Why?

Because the Ancient Hebrews, who invented the "omniscient God" and credited Him as the source of their mythology, didn't have a clue about Newton's formula for gravity.

Imagine how little we'd know if we chained ourself to the Bible as the source of all human knowledge.

 

[AV1611VET]

Because the Ancient Hebrews, who invented the "omniscient God" and credited Him as the source of their mythology, didn't have a clue about Newton's formula for gravity.

Your answer doesn't fit the questions.

Imagine how little we'd know if we chained ourself to the Bible as the source of all human knowledge.

A lot more than if you chained yourself to On the Origin of Species...

 

[Psudopod]

A lot more than if you chained yourself to On the Origin of Species...

Can you name one person one this forum that has done that?

 

[AV1611VET]

Can you name one person one this forum that has done that?

No,why?

 

[MrGoodBytes]

Right --- video games and movies like Jurassic Park.

What part of medical and agricultural research didn't you understand?

 

[AV1611VET]

What part of medical and agricultural research didn't you understand?

The parts where they exclude God from their literature.

 

[EnemyPartyII]

The parts where they exclude God from their literature.

Where would you like to see God added into medical literature?

 

[MrGoodBytes]

The parts where they exclude God from their literature.

Well then, show me how you would insert God in a medical textbook.

 

[trivista]

The parts where they exclude God from their literature.

God is excluded from Computer Science research and books as well.

But please let me know how God being included in CS would help the field.

 

[AV1611VET]

You guys don't understand. I said where science disagrees with the Bible, science is wrong.

God gave us brains and expects us to use them; but not to discredit Him.

It's okay to build technology (now), but just don't forget Who gave us the resources (and when).

 

[trivista]

You guys don't understand. I said where science disagrees with the Bible, science is wrong.

God gave us brains and expects us to use them; but not to discredit Him.

It's okay to build technology (now), but just don't forget Who gave us the resources (and when).

You used the word Exclude not the word Disagree.