Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Israel has never had, and never will have a Christian covenant like the present one in Christ's Blood, of which He is mediator. The new law covenant with Israel in Jer and Eze has not transpired yet, which will be during the Millennia.The same thing Heb 8:6-13 is talking about; i.e., Lk 22:20, 1 Co 11:25.
Not according to apostolic teaching authoritative to the church in Heb 8:6-13, Ro 11:17-23.Israel has never had, and never will have a Christian covenant like the present one in Christ's Blood, of which He is mediator.
The new law covenant with Israel in Jer and Eze has not transpired yet, which will be during the Millennia.
I think the truth about Jer, Eze and quite a few other prophecies are not going to be understood. Thankfully, and understandingly it's not essential doctrine!Not according to apostolic teaching authoritative to the church in Heb 8:6-13, Ro 11:17-23.
The NT teachings of the gospels and epistles were written by the apostles of the NT (with the exception of Mark, Luke, James).
They are NT apostolic teaching.
I was not able to see your point.Thanks for this. On bullet point 5, I understood that the Jews realized that they crucified their Messiah after the antichrist broke the covenant which triggered Christ's return. But not so according to the paper.
The hysterical gospel hating mob in Acts 19 shouting "Great is Artemis of the Ephesians!" was that
also a New Testament church according to your generalization?
καὶ ταῦτα εἰπὼν ἀπέλυσε τὴν ἐκκλησίαν.
And when he had said these things, he dismissed the assembly. (Acts 19:41)
By appealing to the basic definition of ekklesia you're not proving all that much theologically.
This is nonsense.
The two ethic peoples becoming one in the Lord Jesus does not include the Jews who do not believe in Christ, but believe in God. Yes, these Jews truly believe in God, as Christ demonstrated. When He said "Ye believe in God," He was confirming a truth, thus a Jew can truly believe in God without believing in Christ. Even though they dishonor God by their unbelief in Christ (Jhn 5:23), which is the worst evil among many with Israel, God will not fail to restore them; even to the point of "causing" them to live according to a new law (Eze 36:27).Not according to apostolic teaching authoritative to the church in Heb 8:6-13, Ro 11:17-23.
I think the NT is understood, is authoritative to the church, and all not in agreement with it is error.I think the truth about Jer, Eze and quite a few other prophecies are not going to be understood. Thankfully, and understandingly it's not essential doctrine!
Or until one can make a Biblical demonstration of their supposed error.
The refuge of the failed argument. . .Again, you must understand how the human mind works. No one can be convinced of anything if they are not ready.
I wish that were true, but many have the wrong ideas concerning some basic doctrines.I think the NT is understood, is authoritative to the church, and all not in agreement with it is error.
And I never said every assembly is a new testament church.My point was that just because you see the word "church" in scripture, it does not necessarily means its the Body of Christ.
When I use the Body of Christ for certain I mean the church universal.The BOC is a church true, but there are other churches in scripture that are not the BOC
Your point that for Paul to preach the gospel of grace was notIf I preach that my wife has long hair,
and you preach that your wife has long hair.
Does it follow that my wife is your wife?
Your point that for Paul to preach the gospel of grace was not
necessarily his preaching of the gospel of the kingdom is nonsensical.
I don't see any clever way to salvage that error. Its just wrong headed. I would say it is too shortsighted.
That equallly applies to Romans 8:30I think the NT is understood, is authoritative to the church, and all not in agreement with it is error.
There is nothing more you can do. There is no way forward for you on this point except to believe the gospel is the gospel of graceSo if Paul preached the kingdom of God in his gospel
And the 12 preached the kingdom of God in their gospel.
You will conclude that they are therefore preaching the same gospel?
If that is your argument and you don't see how it is non-sequitur, despite my example I have provided for you, then there is nothing more I can do. We can move on.
There is nothing more you can do. There is no way forward for you on this point except to believe the gospel is the gospel of grace
and also the gospel of the kingdom. Paul preached the same gospel as the twelve.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?