S
Servant of Jesus
Guest
Interfaith dialogue can take a few routes.
There are those who only wish to have strife and conflict. These people are the enemies of peace. They do not wish for the world to get better, to attempt less war, to attempt less suffering through religious conflict. They merely care about their side being better or winning.
There are also those who wish to find common ground. To have peaceful discussions where each side can learn and understand better. They do what those who wish to create conflict hate; they talk. Talk is the great enemy of conflict. When people become humanized, it is harder to harm them. The conflict minded people wish to reduce the other side into beings that are less than human, that move with a single mind and are only there to fight.
It is up to each of us to decide which side we wish to be on.
Is finding common ground even possible with some of these issues?
In Israel, the Jewish people were given certain lands by God. They were then kicked off that land, and their city and temple were destroyed.
In 1967, after responding to a conflict they did not start, they regained those lands- specifically, the Temple Mount and the City of David, and other lands on the West Bank.
Now they are being told to vacate those lands and retreat back to the 1967 borders if they hope to have peace with the Palestinians. But the ultimate Palestinian position is even more radical- most of them want Israel to be pushed into the sea; to reinstate the pre-1948 border.
So in this case, there is no common ground- Israel will never, ever vacate their land- especially the City of David in Jerusalem. There is no point in bringing this up in any negotiations- it is a non-starter.
Sometimes I think we have to have the courage to tell it like it is- to say "no- there is a line in the sand"; to say "no- the violence you are promoting is wrong."
Upvote
0