Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ask them yourself.So not being able to confirm something is equal to denying it ?
There's your problem.I learned from scholars who taught Genesis from the Hebrew.
You really have no idea how science works, do you?I try not to, but science sure does, when they truncate 99.999% of it by denying the spiritual world.
Again, this does not answer my question.I am not a a young earth creationist.
I learned from scholars who taught Genesis from the Hebrew. Not English translations. Certain ancients that knew and studied the Hebrew text would have been matter of fact about it when science finally caught up and discovered there had been other worlds created before this one. The ancients did not understand what those other worlds were exactly. But, they knew the Bible speaks of such a thing. So those who study the Scriptures can thank science for finally unveiling in detail what the Torah and some of the NT had been saying all along. Science verified the Bible.
If interested? Online a free book is offered for reading on the subject.
Written by a scientist, no less.
Without Form and Void - Frontpage
Please note in the chapter listing the title of the first chapter.
grace and peace ........
"Evidence" being the key word, correct?You really have no idea how science works, do you?
Science will accept ANYTHING if evidence is presented for it, and that evidence can stand up to scrutiny.
Not being able to confirm something is not the same thing as denying it.Well that is one way to evade actually answering the question.
Yes."Evidence" being the key word, correct?
Merry ChristmasSo show me the TESTABLE EVIDENCE for the spiritual world, and if that evidence is able to withstand scrutiny, I'll accept it.
Not being able to confirm something is not the same thing as denying it.
Science has tested the spiritual world with their myopic instruments and such and concluded the spiritual world is inconclusive.Ah, so when science says nothing about the spiritual world because it can't be tested, they aren't DENYING it, are they? They're just saying they can't confirm it. So your claim in post 358 was just plain WRONG, wasn't it?
Here's how it looks to me...Science has tested the spiritual world with their myopic instruments and such and concluded the spiritual world is inconclusive.
I'm not buying it.
Science changes words in the Bible ("miracle" to "magic" -- "child in the womb" to "fetus") to suit their agendas.
From their garbage comes such stuff as pray to milk cartons instead of God, some invisible dragon in someone's garage, give all other gods equal airtime, and so on and so forth.
Ya ... my Post 358 stands as written.
Science marches more and more to a different drummer today.You, on the other hand, seem to be twisting everything to suit YOUR agenda of demonizing science whenever you can so as to justify your rejection of it whenever you have painted yourself into a corner.
And so you come full circle back to where you started, assuming your conclusion in order to prove that your conclusion is true.Science marches more and more to a different drummer today.
People can use science to justify lifestyles that are anathema to God, justify killing their unborn, justify saying the Flood didn't happen, and I could go on and on and on and on and on.
There are several products that I think science created to ... shall I say ... decrease the surplus population (as Ebenezer Scrooge put it).Sounds like science to me.
You do. Unsubscribing...Science marches more and more to a different drummer today.
People can use science to justify lifestyles that are anathema to God, justify killing their unborn, justify saying the Flood didn't happen, and I could go on and on and on and on and on.
I know.You do. Unsubscribing...
You do realize that "surplus" population is only possible in first place due to scientific advances in agriculture, medical fields, transportation and so on ?There are several products that I think science created to ... shall I say ... decrease the surplus population
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?