Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
One cannot be baptized unless he first hears the gospel (Romans 10:17) and believes (Mark 16:16).So you believe you can be baptized at any point in your life, no matter what spiritual condition your in at the time and that counts?
I didGladly if you will answers my questions first.
A subsequent baptism can remit all sins if one makes a true profession of their faith in THE GOSPEL"
Is there a problem?
What?
Sorry but I don't understand what you are trying to say period
Still like an answer to the two questions. I felt the slight embellishing part was the assumption all of Cornelius relatives were "saved" and that there was some "profession of faith" by all.Some amount of the spirit?
I don't understand that either
You did not actually. You said,I did
And being washed means being washed. Christ's blood doesn't wash away some of our sins
HIS blood washes away all our sins
Which goes to the embellishing point on Acts 10 again, there is no "true profession of faith in the Gospel" mentioned in that story. So yes there is a problem and no that that did not answer my questions. I'll rephrase.A subsequent baptism can remit all sins if one makes a true profession of their faith in THE GOSPEL
Is there a problem?
Actually, justification by faith is the means that God has instituted for our salvation.
So, if water saves, then everyone is saved when they take a shower or a bubble bath.
Any baby Christian, should understand that water baptism follows, conversion.
Being born again is the proof you are saved, and never a dunk in a pool or a sprinkle from a magic wand should be considered as redemption.
If you have a bible, then you'll notice that every person who was water baptized was converted first.
Its works like this.....BELIEVE and then be water baptized.
See it?
It the BELIEVING that God requires to redeem using The Blood of Jesus, and following that, you are to be baptized.
However, if you are water baptized but are not born again by the Spirit of God, then you are just as lost as you could possible be.
Our means of salvation is Jesus dying on the cross as the sacrifice for our sins. If baptism were the means of salvation then He did not need to die but could have just order us all to be baptized.
without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness Hebews 9:22
It is required of the believer, upon receiving His Word and is done for the remission of sins, creating a fully clean vessel for a complete indwelling of the Holy Spirit. Put another way, if death came as one arises from the water salvation may be assured. The reason some believers at one time sought to delay Baptism until they thought they were approaching deaths door.
"On that day there shall be a fountain opened for the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem to cleanse them from sin and uncleanness.'
'John the baptizer appeared in the wilderness, preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins.'
"and he went into all the region about the Jordan, preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins."
"He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned."
"And Peter said to them, "Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
...
So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls."
"And now why do you wait? Rise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on his name.'
"Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, so that as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life."
"For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body--Jews or Greeks, slaves or free--and all were made to drink of one Spirit."
Still like an answer to the two questions. I felt the slight embellishing part was the assumption all of Cornelius relatives were "saved" and that there was some "profession of faith" by all.
miknik said:acts 10:44 (All were saved). The Holy Spirit is THAT seal that any who believe...receive. And the TRUTH that ALL received the HOLY SPIRIT is that they ALL began to glorify GOD Peter saw and recognized that ALL had received the HOLY SPIRIT (even before water baptism) which is why he said should we deny water baptism seeing all these have received the HOLY SPIRIT?
There is no mention of a "true profession of faith" of all Cornelius relatives brought to hear the Apostle, as Cornelius is the only mentioned talking.
Saint Peter preached. The Spirit came down on "all who heard the Word" and the evidence of that Spirit being present in those people was demonstrated in behavior. I think it would be presumptuous to think everyone hearing the sermon had the Spirit come upon them, but rather only those that heard and believed (and maybe not even on all of those or at least not the same degree).mik nik said:. They ALL began to glorify GOD. When one receives THE HOLY SPIRIT believing THE GOSPEL, THE HOLY SPIRIT begins to teach and lead the believer (and Peter recognized that this was what happened because they were ALL speaking the TRUTHS of GOD which can only be known by THE SPIRIT) .
THE HOLY SPIRIT glorifies CHRIST. Peter preached CHRIST...and they ALL believed
miknik said:. I think it's presumptuous to say that ALL means some when GOD's WORD says ALL
Christians Jews witnessing marveled that Gentiles had received the same Spirit as they. Presumably hearing this Peter declares how can we not Baptize those who have received the Spirit. This is neither a denial that Baptism remits sin or even a declaration of a proper order (as in Spirit first, then Baptism or Baptism then Spirit). He is indicating that Baptism is a requirement for the believer. He then commanded it be done immediately. We should remember too that early on many Jewish converts still wrongly assumed to be a Christian that one had to first become Jewish and held very strong opinions about it.
Am saying the more we sin, the more we grieve God's Spirit, and our sinning without remittance could reach a point that Spirit that was "fully indwelling in us" can no longer abide as it can when ALL prior sins are remitted. Which is why it is a good idea to stress the importance as Saint Peter did with having a new believer be baptized as soon as possible. Also why the Apostles repeatedly stressed the practice of Reconciliation with God to Christians already Baptized.miknik said:We should remember that the reason Peter was sent to a gentile was to teach him that "what GOD makes clean is clean "
God made clean which Peter both acknowledged and accepted when he said prior to water baptism "do we have any right to deny water baptism seeing these have received GOD's HOLY SPIRIT (GOD's SEAL)?
miknik said:do not grieve the HOLY SPIRIT of whom you were SEALED to the day of redemption?
GOD disciplines HIS CHILDREN when they sin. And when they confess their sins HE IS FAITHFUL and JUST to purify us of all unrighteousness...all who hope in CHRIST purify themselves even as HE IS PURE
This is all interesting but here is an important question for the understanding being proposed. What did the Philippian jailer understand when Paul said "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house?" The jailer was a Philippian not a Jew or a Christian therefore he did not have either testament. He had not sat down and read all of the NT, which OBTW had not been written at that time. Would he have understood that baptism was also a requirement? Or more logically would he have understood the only requirement was "believe?""Believe" and believe only" are two completely different things. Adding the word "only" is changing God's word. If a recipe for a cake has eggs as an ingredient, then "eggs" and "eggs only" are not the same thing for "eggs only" will never get you a cake. Christ's "recipe" for salvation was never "believe only" but includes repentance Luke 13:3; confession, Matthew 10:32-33 and baptism, Mark 16:16. Since repentance is part of the 'recipe' can "belief only" ever save an impenitent person? No. No more than "eggs only" can get one a cake.
You make a really good point and I want to share an often missed gem.
James 2:19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.
Notice how the KJV added an "est" to one form of believe, but did not to the other. What the translators were doing here was differentiating between active and passive forms of the word. When we see "believest" (or believeth) it is active, without the "est" is passive. The difference is the active form demands ACTION... it isn't just believing in the sense of being convinced in the mind, it is believing to the point of action, WORKS. It is tied to faith... faith comes by HEARING and faith without works is dead. So, true faith is hearing and doing. On the other hand, the devils believe and tremble. Their form is passive... they are not hearing God and acting on what they hear, they are in rebellion. By the way, even John 3:16 is in the active form.
Except for one thing. The believers were praying for those who needed IMMEDIATE ACTIONWhat a gem! Thanks!
Do you know what the will of THE FATHER is?Matthew 7:21 "Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven."
John 3:5 "Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God."
Born of water & Spirit>>>>>>>>>>>>enter the kingdom
Doeth the will of the Father>>>>>>>>>enter the kingdom
There is one way to enter the kingdom/be saved. Obeying by submitting to water baptized is DOING as the Father commanded (Acts 2:38; Acts 10:47-48). There is no being born again without DOING.
Being born again has nothing to do with the physical birth/corruptible seed, 1 Peter 1:23
This is all interesting but here is an important question for the understanding being proposed. What did the Philippian jailer understand when Paul said "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house?" The jailer was a Philippian not a Jew or a Christian therefore he did not have either testament. He had not sat down and read all of the NT, which OBTW had not been written at that time. Would he have understood that baptism was also a requirement? Or more logically would he have understood the only requirement was "believe?"
i would like to know what happens for all those ( at the last hour) who call on the name of THE LORD
Believe John 8:24Do you know what the will of THE FATHER is?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?