• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is touching yourself a sin? (2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Floatingaxe

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2007
14,757
877
73
Ontario, Canada
✟22,726.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives


Watch who you are calling a bigot, lad.

Now, grow up and be an honourable man, and stop sinning.
 
Upvote 0

Floatingaxe

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2007
14,757
877
73
Ontario, Canada
✟22,726.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives

Adam and Eve had rules too! Yes, I think it just may make no sense to you, as you would ignore them as well.

There are rules to live by, if you would bother to read the Word. If you aren't serving God, then don't expect Him to bless you.
 
Upvote 0

Zecryphon

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2006
8,987
2,005
52
Phoenix, Arizona
✟19,186.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
This is what I was talking about........
"This is what I was talking about........"

Dude, you started off your post by calling others ignorant and judgmental. You then went on to call some members of the church bigots. You have GOT to expect some backlash when you do that stuff. The word you're looking for isn't bigot. As a bigot is someone who rejects another person for usually a superficial reason. We are not rejecting those who touch, what we are doing is sharing why we think it's a sinful action. You have called our arguments ignorant but have yet to show why they are. The simple statement of "the Bible never says it's sinful" is not disproving our logic or arguments. It's simply a statement by you and nothing more.
 
Upvote 0

Dyin2live

Active Member
Aug 26, 2006
269
9
33
California
✟22,947.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
if God mentioned something as uncommon as beastuality, don't you think he would mention masturbation which is extremely common?
Maybe its not important? Once again, I am not declaring the act of masturbation in itself to be rite or wrong, I am just asking questions.
 
Upvote 0

Dyin2live

Active Member
Aug 26, 2006
269
9
33
California
✟22,947.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Im just talking about they way you guys were acting toward holo and you were sorta mocking him. And your over all attitude is not very respectful. I didnt say you were bigots, I said you were kind of acting like it.

I just think we should get back on the topic.
 
Upvote 0

Floatingaxe

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2007
14,757
877
73
Ontario, Canada
✟22,726.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives


Yes, why don't you? holo often mocks believers. Get used to it.
 
Upvote 0

Floatingaxe

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2007
14,757
877
73
Ontario, Canada
✟22,726.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives


Do you have to have God spell everything out to you? If you aren't able to have sex with a ewife, you shopuldn;t be having sex with anyone, least of all yourself.

Get a hobby or a job, son.

If we lkive according to how God wants, we shouldn't have so much time on our hands that we fall into such temptation.
 
Upvote 0

Dyin2live

Active Member
Aug 26, 2006
269
9
33
California
✟22,947.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

Im not old enough for a job and I do have hobbies. Almost Every guy my age deals with this problem, but you wouldn't understand as you have never been a teenage boy. And im not declaring holo innocent he did a bit of mocking too.
 
Upvote 0

Zecryphon

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2006
8,987
2,005
52
Phoenix, Arizona
✟19,186.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
"if God mentioned something as uncommon as beastuality, don't you think he would mention masturbation which is extremely common?"

It's extremely common nowadays. Where is your proof, rather than a modern day presupposition, that it was common to do in the Biblical times?

"Maybe its not important?"

Could be one of those common sense issues. You have to keep in mind the culture, know how they would have acted, what they considered appropriate, how they would have interpreted the scriptures or the oral teachings rather when reading the scriptures. We do this to avoid making errors and imposing our cultural norms upon people to whom our norms would be foreign.

"Once again, I am not declaring the act of masturbation in itself to be rite or wrong, I am just asking questions."

I understand that. Since the Bible does not explicitly address this issue, I would look for similar issues, like lust, proper sexual conduct, etc. and see what it says and then draw a conclusion based upon God's teachings on those issues. Of course, you should pray about this too and seek wisdom and counsel from the Holy Spirit as well.
 
Upvote 0

Zecryphon

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2006
8,987
2,005
52
Phoenix, Arizona
✟19,186.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
"Im just talking about they way you guys were acting toward holo and you were sorta mocking him."

Holo mocks Christians and others who have the audacity to disagree with him. He is rude, antagonistic and sarcastic when the situation doesn't warrant such behavior. Usually when people do this, other people will return the favor. When that happens he cries "foul" and calls people "judgmental".

"And your over all attitude is not very respectful. I didnt say you were bigots, I said you were kind of acting like it."

Hey if you're gonna espouse false doctrine based upon what the Holy Spirit has revealed to me, you can bet your bottom dollar I'm gonna call you on it and there's nothing wrong with that. Non-essential issues in Christianity are open to debate by Christians. Masturbation would be a non-essential issue. Some people are so afraid of being called "judgmental" and other names that they just let the false teachers and doctrines slide. Not me. I'm prepared to be called "arrogant", "judgmental", an "ideological fascist" and anything else you can think of. I don't fear the judgment of man, I fear the judgment of God. One day I will stand before God and give a testimony of all my actions, thoughts and deeds, even the ones in this very thread. I will do so with my head held high, with no regrets, because I am a servant of God and a defender of His word.

"I just think we should get back on the topic."

I do too, but to satisfy the consciences of some in here, I do have to ask you this. Do your parents know you're on here talking to adults about this topic?
 
Upvote 0

Dyin2live

Active Member
Aug 26, 2006
269
9
33
California
✟22,947.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

Hey if you're gonna espouse false doctrine based upon what the Holy Spirit has revealed to me, you can bet your bottom dollar I'm gonna call you on it and there's nothing wrong with that.
Huh???

Oh I don't know if you read my other message, I realized Holo was mocking a bit too. Of course my parents don't know that im talking to adults about this topic. My friends don't have the answer. The Bible doens't say for sure. And im not sure if the Holy Spirit is convicting me. And I definitely would NOT ask my parents this question. Can you say embarassing?
 
Upvote 0

holo

former Christian
Dec 24, 2003
8,992
751
✟85,294.00
Country
Norway
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Everyone always asks this: "What Would Jesus Do"?
And they really shouldn't. The question is wrong from the outset, because it assumes that you are wicked and don't have a clue morally (and indeed a lot of churches do treat their members as if they're completely unable to make good moral judgments). It also takes the focus away from what Christ has already done, and IS doing, which is sufficient, and focuses on ME. But we're not called to look on ourselves, but on HIM.

To put it another way; would Jesus ask what Jesus would do?

I've seen people suffer tremendously under the WWJD regime.

Do you think Jesus would touch?
I haven't really thought of that. It makes no difference to me.

Do you see any evidence in the Bible of Jesus living for Himself or rather do you see evidence of Him putting aside what He may have wanted to do and doing what His father had commanded Him to do? I see the latter and never the former.
What does masturbation have to do with that?
 
Upvote 0

Breetai

For I am not ashamed of the Gospel...
Dec 3, 2003
13,939
396
✟31,320.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Im just curious about the answer to this topic, but I don't get any answers and I get talked down to by floating axe and zecryphon. Maybe I shouldn't have put up my age.
Here is the answer: Masturbation is not a sin.

Neither is drinking alcohol. Just make sure to keep both under control!
 
Upvote 0

holo

former Christian
Dec 24, 2003
8,992
751
✟85,294.00
Country
Norway
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
I know those things are wrong completely regardless of the law.

By not doing these things that God has commanded are wicked, I live a life that is pleasing to God
I know a lot of people who live more moral lives than most Christians I've met. But they are atheists and muslims and new-agers and whatnot. However good they behave, it'll never be pleasing to God.

My behaviour could never please God anyhow. So thankfully, I'm free from focusing on trying to do good enough for God, and rather let God himself do what God does best - through me.

Only if you're going back to the law to earn your way to Heaven. If you're living a law guided life out of thankfulness to God, that is not wrong.
The intentions would be good, but the results will suffer. Because when you try to live according to the law, YOU are left to achieve things. Living in faith, on the other hand, lets Christ GIVE you victory, it lets Him prepare the works FOR you, it lets HIM live. Living according to law is actually the opposite of dying to ourselves. Also, the commandment is the power of sin, so the more you try to live according to the law, the easier it is to be caught in the sin that the law prohibits. It happened with the first forbidden apple, and it still happens to believers everywhere today. When the commandment comes, sin springs to life.

Dying to yourself means dying to your rules for your life and adopting God's rules for your life. Living for Him.
What rules did God have for Adam and Eve's lives? Aside from being fruitful, the only commandment was to NOT learn about right and wrong. Again, the law was never meant for righteous people.

And did Adam and Eve "live for Him"? I'm sure if you'd asked them, they wouldn't even understand what you meant. They just lived. They lived WITH Him and IN Him and FROM Him.

You just don't get it. You can not comprehend the fact that if you are not born again that when you die, you will be judged by God's moral law.
I won't be judged according to some moral law. Or, if I am, I will be declared righteous.

I'm not saying that sinners won't be judged righteously. The mosaic law, though, has nothing to do with it. It was only given to Israel.

He said Himself that not one letter, jot or tittle of the law would be set aside until He came again.
So you figure we are to be guided by it. But I've never seen a christian even try to follow the law. Instead, they take only part of the law, and construct a bunch of new commandments from the NT.

The law is your guide to living a life that is pleasing to God.
No, actually the law was meant to make SIN exceedingly SINFUL. And that's what it does.

Abraham didn't need the law as a guide to anything. Why should I?

Right, when the father started talking to the son he saw that the son was broken and sorry for his actions. He extended grace in that case, not the law.
No, he extended grace as soon as he saw his son.

But I don't see that attitude of humility or thankfulness to God reflected in what you write. I don't see that you have any need for God's rules in your life
Good! The law is for the wicked and the ungodly. I'm born again, I am in Him and He is in me. He IS my life. What rules, exactly, should I need in my life? What rules do YOU need to have in your life?

and that is not the attitude of someone who is thankful and loving towards the very God that saved him.
If someone saves your life, will you ask the guy for some rules you can follow in order to show your gratitude?

Exactly. Because they're fueled by pride and rebellion and ignorance about how holy and just God is. They only see it from their side, never from God's side.
Yes, and when we try to tell them how God sees things, we portray him as an angry judge.

Actually, that's God's idea too. Jesus let the adulterous woman go. He said "go and sin no more" - do you think she never sinned again? If she went straight back to a life in whoredom, do you think Jesus would regret what He did? Barabbas, too, was let go. He represents us.

Even though they're career crimminals. If a judge just let a career crimminal go back out into the world to commit more crimes, because he was a loving person, what would you think of that judge?
Unlike a human judge's love, God's love actually transforms people.

Would you think He was just and doing his duty, which is to punish law breakers and uphold the law?
God is a father more than a judge. And He HAS judged sin. He did that on the cross. The punishment was laid on HIM.

Yes, in order to FOLLOW Christ you would actually have to do all those tings and pick up your cross etc. But that's not the way we are supposed to follow Him. Because now, He has already picked up the cross, and we are DEAD. His burden is LIGHT and His yoke is EASY. Jesus IS good and DOES good, and He's never good to us in order that we shall do this or perform that or please him here or achieve somthing there. Jesus does good because of WHO HE IS, not because of what we deserve or are able to give in return. God is LOVE.

But a new building fund isn't the same as being a social outreach center.
That's my point - they will raise new buildings and walk right past the hobos and the beggars.

God has given you rules for how you can serve Him and live a life that is pleasing to Him and you want nothing to do with any of that. Is it the word "rules" you don't like?
I have nothing against rules per se, but I prefer life. Christ didn't come to give us rules, but LIFE. And life is to KNOW HIM.

But I'll consider a rule if I run into a situation where I'd need it.

Well, I never say God has commanded me to follow rules, so no worry

See? It's not about living for God or by the rules He has set down for your life, but living for yourself and doing what you please.
True, I do what I please. And what do I please? To do good. To worship the Lord. To share the good news.

But what rules, exactly, do you mean He has set down for my life? Jesus IS my life. Has God set down rules for Jesus?

If you're not living for God, you're living for yourself. It really is that black and white.
It's not just me and God, though. I have neighbours too. But I don't live FOR anything or anyone. I live IN the Lord.

To put it another way, I live "for" God in the same way that Adam and Eve did.

Oh I hope you're not holding up Adam and Eve as the pillars of living lives that are pleasing to God.
Oh yes, I most definately am! He saw that it was GOOD.

Didn't all this trouble start with them?
Yes, because they made the choice to eat from the law tree. They shouldn't have, and I won't do the same mistake.

Plus you have no way of proving the claim that the 10 Commandments would not make sense to Adam and Eve.
What should they need the ten commandments for?

They knew exactly what God expected them to do.
Yes. To be fruitful and multiply.

It's when they sat under a false teacher, Satan, that their troubles began.
Exactly. It was satan who made them aware of law and sin and nakedness.

Yeah, see that's the thing, from what you've written here, the fruits in your life don't look like good fruit.
What does it look like?

"Yes, and that's pretty much the problem."

A statement of faith or beliefs is hardly a problem.
It is, if you use it to measure and determine the faith of others. God has GIVEN each of us faith according to HIS OWN measure. Not according to a creed.

Well then your problem is the source material. The source material for the creeds is the Bible. They are not scripture, but they are scriptural.
Well, "he went and hanged himself" is straight out of scripture too, but that doesn't make it useful or even sensible.

He has defined Himself in His written word to mankind.
He has defined Himself in Christ, not in a book. In a person. The book describes God in many ways, but the only way to actually KNOW God, is to MEET Him.

Yes children must realize why they need a dad, it's part of having a complete understanding of the family unit and how things are supposed to work.
Why must a child realize why they have a dad and understand the family unit? Don't you let you kids be just kids? The fact that we understand family dynamics and whatnot when we grow older is a bonus, not a requirement for being a child.

You can't compare a flawed human relationship with your earthly father with your Father in Heaven.
God Himself did.

Maybe so, and maybe by not stealing I have also kept Egyptian law. I am as much a subject to Egyptian law as I am to the ten commandments.

And why did you do it? Not to get into Heaven or earn something from God, but becaue you love Him.
The point isn't to keep commandments, but to love.

I love, and the law has absolutely nothing to do with it.

And you fear I may be dishonest about myself because I don't share you exact understanding of things - you can assume the best about me until it turns out we're not exactly the same. We disagree on MY use for the law, and you begin talking about immoral brothers and wolves in sheep's clothing...

Your posts have raised serious concerns with some people on this board, we are attempting to find out if our concerns are valid
Hehe! No offense, but I'm getting a laugh out of stuff like that.

All roads lead home then?
No. There are as many ways to Christ as there are people.

Universalism at it's finest.
Almost as fine as your sarcasm
 
Upvote 0

Floatingaxe

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2007
14,757
877
73
Ontario, Canada
✟22,726.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives


If you are embarrassed by your behaviour and can't discuss this with parents, then your conscience is alive and well. Heed that. It is God's provision to you for alerting you to sin. Ignore it and short-circuit that warning system. God will then leave you to your own devices, and you will have successfully cut God out of an area of your life that He wants you to give over to His control. He wants all of us, not just some of us.

The desires that cause you to do such things needs to be under control, and God can give you that control. Sexual gratification is achieved through intimacy with a woman you are married to only. Don't steal from your rightful future mate what is rightfully hers.
 
Upvote 0

holo

former Christian
Dec 24, 2003
8,992
751
✟85,294.00
Country
Norway
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Adam and Eve had rules too!
What rules?

There are rules to live by, if you would bother to read the Word. If you aren't serving God, then don't expect Him to bless you.
Oh, but He blesses me abundantly all the time. Not because I've performed something in partucular or that I somehow deserve it, but because I am in Christ. He blesses both of us for the exact same reason - we are His children.

Why did God bless Adam and Eve?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.