• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is Torture Ever Morally Justified?

Is Torture Ever Morally Justified?

  • Never

  • Yes, but only in very rare or extreme cercumstances.

  • Yes, as a common method of interrogation.

  • Not sure


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

Fin12

Guest
Yes.

But only to extract informational desperatly needed, when you have very good reason to believe that the victim knows the information.

It cannot be morally used to extract confessions.

The "5 minute ticking bomb story" isn't realistic.

Many people don't even have the slightest clue what torture is. It is a living nightmare. Films and newspapers cannot even comprehend the physchological as well as physical trauma that is experienced in torture.

Many torture victims give up before the process begins, their captors only need to explain what the torturee is going to be put through. The prospect of knowing it is going to happen to you is often all it takes.

5 minutes can be turned into a living hell.

In the ticking bomb scenario, the victim is given two options.

A: Live, the torture stops and he goes to jail.

B: Experience the most painful 5 minutes of his life and then die.

Honestly does anyone here think that if they were tied down and their captor starting melting their left ear with a cigarette lighter, they would still consider holding out for the full 5 minutes, just to die?
 
Upvote 0

Caoimhe

Not a regular member
Aug 3, 2008
179
12
✟22,869.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
From a Machiavellian principle, torture would be deemed a necessary tool to maintain one's power. But morally speaking would that be justified? No, I hardly think it is ever right to endorse such barbaric practices on humans and living creatures. Torture is used to intimidate the powerless and coerce people into submission. At times torture methods are used to force false confessions out of people. And what good would that bring to this world anyway?
 
Upvote 0

Norseman

EAC Representative
Apr 29, 2004
4,706
256
22
Currently in China
✟28,677.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others

If I was inclined to plant a bomb to kill millions of people, I certainly would. Or, I'd lie to the torturer to ease the pain a bit. If possible, I'd trick him into accidentally detonating the bomb. Prison in the US is bad enough that I would rather die. My options are to be tortured for 5 minutes, or for my entire life. That's an easy choice. When you want to die, I think pain and disfigurement would be much more tolerable. Consider the Buddhist monks who self-immolate...
 
Upvote 0

cantata

Queer non-theist, with added jam.
Feb 20, 2007
6,215
683
38
Oxford, UK
✟32,193.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats

Well, precisely. Sam Harris' argument is that if you are willing to use napalm in Iraq - which the US definitely did - then you should also be willing to torture individuals in the name of winning your war. Isn't it pretty barbaric to find burning the skin off civilians acceptable, but torturing one known criminal a despicable crime? Of course, I'd rather that we didn't use the napalm or the torture, but if the former is okay then so must be the latter.

Collateral damage is only accidental in the loosest sense of the word. It's inevitable in modern warfare. So attempting to draw a distinction between "accidental" collateral damage and "deliberate" torture is, as you say, disingenuous.


I don't see what this has to do with anything I've said. I'm not condoning torture or attempting to argue that it's okay for America to use it but not America's enemies. I'm saying that the US' (public) position on torture is inconsistent.
 
Upvote 0
F

Fin12

Guest

I have to doubt prison their is that bad, if so why don't the convicts kill themselves before entering prison, that way they die (like our madman) instead of having to deal with "a life time of torture".

Prison in the U.S. gives a chance of being raped. Play your cards right and you could get away without being raped. Plus it's not, non-stop torture, and the pain wouldn't be a qaurter as bad as what you would suffer over those 5 minutes.

I'd press to assume you have never been tortured, if you really want a feel, hold a lighter on your hand for 3 seconds, " would you be willing to go for 5 minutes?"


Prison, chance of rape, chance of death, get out eventually.

or tortures death.

hmmm... ...I'll have to think on that one
 
Upvote 0

Norseman

EAC Representative
Apr 29, 2004
4,706
256
22
Currently in China
✟28,677.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others

Well, here's what one inmate says about prison in the US:


If I can be subdued while some police man melts my ear off, the same and worse can happen in prison.
 
Upvote 0
F

Fin12

Guest
Keyword "Can".


The torture situation is definate pain and definate death.

Prison, possible pain and possible death.

Plus that's america, what if it was sweden?

Thats also only 1 man's account, and once again if all the accounts were like that, the prisons would be empty... ...everyone would be killing themselves. As put forward by the logic of "I'd rather die than go to prison".

People hype the whole jail thing up ALOT, yes it can be rough but I've met soldiers who have killed, I've known drug dealers.

And you know what, they are people like everyone else. Alot of people in jail are their just to get by, not every jail society is made up of 999 unhinged mike tyson sized rapists, and 1 scrawny prison punch bag.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

kiwimac

Bishop of the See of Aotearoa ROCCNZ;Theologian
Site Supporter
May 14, 2002
14,990
1,520
64
New Zealand
Visit site
✟620,160.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Utrecht
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
An article I wrote last year.

 
Upvote 0

MoonlessNight

Fides et Ratio
Sep 16, 2003
10,217
3,523
✟63,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others

It comes down to politics working from definitions, and the fact that politics is a system that can be played.

It reminds me of when the genocide was happening in Rwanda, and there was much debate over whether what was happening was really "genocide." The idea being that the world had agreed that genocide can not be allowed to occur, so we would be obligated to step in to prevent if it really was an act of genocide. But what if it fell just short, and so wasn't really genocide? Never mind the fact that whatever you wanted to call it, what was happening in Rwanda was truly despicable and horrible, if it wasn't "genocide" then we didn't have an obligation to step in, because the world had decided that what it really would not allow was genocide.

In the same way, if a technique is horrible but perhaps not quite "torture" it stalls debate and allows the practice to continue. It distracts the public from the fact that it really is horrible no matter what you call it, it's not torture and it's "torture" that's illegal. So if we aren't sure if it's "torture," there is the chance that it might be something acceptable, because we can't classify it.

This is another reason that I don't like it when people start thinking primarily in terms of politics. You can play lawyer games with your opponents or with yourself to avoid doing what is clearly right.
 
Upvote 0

MoonlessNight

Fides et Ratio
Sep 16, 2003
10,217
3,523
✟63,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
(coming late to the thread... oh well)

Torture does not work. We know that since the burning times.

Nothing in the world can justify inflicting pain on a fellow human without even the slightest chance of any benefit to others.

Enough said.

So would torture be justifiable if it actually was a useful method of extracting information? If so it seems to me what we need are more sophisticated methods of torture.
 
Upvote 0

allhart

Messianic believer
Feb 24, 2007
7,543
231
54
Turlock, CA
✟31,377.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
So would torture be justifiable if it actually was a useful method of extracting information? If so it seems to me what we need are more sophisticated methods of torture.
Every experience (bad or good) without God is vain. In saying that truth. One attribute of having a relationship with God is having a guilt free conscience. We must walk with God and depend on his wisdom. Our social relationship in society needs protection from those who dare and care to destroy our social harmony. In saying that I would fight for the cause towards humanitarian equality. (guilt free)
 
Upvote 0

tocis

Warrior of Thor
Jul 29, 2004
2,674
119
55
Northern Germany
✟25,966.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
So would torture be justifiable if it actually was a useful method of extracting information? If so it seems to me what we need are more sophisticated methods of torture.

Assuming torture would work... it would be a very very nasty decision to make. I wouldn't want to ever have to decide whether to torture someone, that much is sure.

No quick and easy answer possible in that case. If many many lives depended, in all likelihood, on applying it... if all other, more humane, methods had failed already... one would probably at least have to seriously consider it. It would never be a "right" decision to make... just possibly the "least wrong" one. Yuck.

Well, no one ever claimed life's easy...
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.