• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Is this "Intelligent Design"?

CarlaB

Active Member
Feb 25, 2016
125
37
36
United Kingdom
✟524.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Would someone who accepted the following be an intelligent design adherent?

1. Evolution takes place.
2. Common descent is real.
3. Many (or all) of the mechanisms posited by Darwin and various mainstream Neo-Darwinist scientists contribute to evolution (mutation, survival of the fittest, epigenetic factors, etc..).
4. The self organizing nature of matter contributes to evolution.

And here is the one that makes classification harder:

6. Much of this is possible, especially number 4, thanks to the reality of pan-psychism or (proto-) panexperientialism which posit consciousness or mindedness, though in radically variant levels of complexity, as inherent to all matter-energy.

Or for that matter what about an outright Berkeley style Idealist or certain Yogachara influenced Buddhists who accept evolution and yet beleive that reality is "mind only"? Intelligence would be ubiquitous and govern the laws that result in organization, information, etc.

...OR pretty much anyone who rejects the idea that consciousness is an epiphenomenon of matter-energy in general?
Where is the intelligence behind it? has anyone found any yet? doesn't intelligence require a brain? does a spirit have a brain?
 
Upvote 0

Papias

Listening to TW4
Dec 22, 2005
3,967
988
59
✟64,806.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Where is the intelligence behind it? has anyone found any yet? doesn't intelligence require a brain? does a spirit have a brain?


It seems to me that a "spirit" requires a working brain. In addition to the huge amounts of evidence (whenever we see consciousness, there is a brain, and whenever that brain is affected by chemicals or physical damage, the consciousness is affected), it seems that if brains weren't required, why would they be here? If God wanted to make thinking people, then why make a brain? Why not make people without brains, since the spirits do the thinking, not the brain? Even if one believes in a God, why would that God make brains if we didn't need them?

In Christ-

Papias
 
Upvote 0

Chris B

Old Newbie
Feb 15, 2015
1,432
644
UK
✟27,424.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I don't know. I'll have to just fall back to "God works in mysterious ways".

But then, couldn't you fall back equally well on "the Invisible Pink Unicorns did it"?
Is there any conceptual difference, except that the word "God" comes loaded with connotation values?
 
Upvote 0

Papias

Listening to TW4
Dec 22, 2005
3,967
988
59
✟64,806.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
But then, couldn't you fall back equally well on "the Invisible Pink Unicorns did it"?
Is there any conceptual difference, except that the word "God" comes loaded with connotation values?

Well, sure. There is no conceptual difference. After all, this is the essence of "faith" - the belief in something for no reason, regardless of, and often in conflict with, the evidence - as per Hebrews 11:1.

In Jesus' name-

Papias
 
Upvote 0