Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
FreeinChrist said:[/color]
I'm not attempting to hijack the thread, parousia. My comment was in line with what was being written. You wrote:
"You argue, by extention, that the Revelation of Jesus Christ was not applicable to those who first received it, by arguing that it decribes events ordained to come to pass thousands of years after thier lifetime."
You wrote that in an attempt to support this:
Your claim that the Revelation of Jesus Christ was not FOR those Christians who FIRST received it dosen't hold up under any sober scrutiny.
You should really try and stop 'putting words in other people's mouths' -
Why would it be? John didn't address it at all in his gospel or letters (written around 80 AD) and it was not the topic of Revelation.
FreeinChrist said:Just like a preterist - always ignoring context.
Why would that particular comment apply to me as far as Timonthy going to the Philipians.
And a great many disagree that the Old Covenant was in effect until 70 AD - instead, that God made it clear that it ended on His part by the tearing of the veil in the temple when Christ died. That veil separated the people from the Holy of Holies, a place only a high priest could go once a year. It was a big part of the Old Covenant. If it was stopped on God's end - that is all that matters.
That is ridiculous reasoning. I am sorry but it is . The Israelites who wandered the wilderness had to because they disobeyed and it took 40 years for the generation to die.
And the burden of the Israelites in the wilderness was caused by their own disobedience.
WE have the same burden as all those in church since it began - to preach the gospel to all the world...but wait - that is another thing you think was completed by 70 AD
I beleive that Satan is still active in the world...that there is STILL the forces of evil active in the world.
YOU are trying, in a very pathetically obvious way, to place words in my mouth that I am not saying. I never said they are ABOVE Christ, parousia. You really need to stop doing that - it is wrong.
There will be a time in the future, parousia, when His is the ONLY name heard - not Buddha, or any of the Hindu gods, or any other name that is worshipped today.
Markea said:I'm curious as to whether anyone else believes that the beast and his false prophet were taken in 410 AD and thrown into the lake of fire then...while the armies of the earth were gathered together against the Lord and His army..? ?
Perhaps he's the only one.. I don't ever recall hearing that before from anyone.. it's usually the 70AD type of response.. but this 410 AD is something new to my ears.. has anyone else even heard of that before..?
Since I believe it was given in 96 AD, I believe it has had application for all who read and heed the words of the prophecy.parousia70 said:[/color]
What's your point Free?
You still believe the Revelation of Jesus Christ was not FOR those who first received it.
If I'm wrong to say that, please describe in what ways it was applicable to them, whether they received in in 68 or 96.
Well, you previously argued from the premise that prophesy given in the Bible that has no biblical record of fulfillment, must therefore not yet be fulfilled.
parousia70 said:[/color]
I dunno Free, perhaps because the text says Paul wished for Jesus to send timothy to YOU shortly. Why wouldn't it apply?
Why on earth then, is that particular scripture, which you claim has no application to you, even in your Bible?
Isn't it just "lifeless history"?
*Sigh*
Paul is clear that the Jews post crusifixion were still "under the Law", yet you argue against his claim.
The writer of Hebrews is clear that the Old Covenant, at the time of the writing of Hebrews, was "growing old and ready to vanish" yet you argue it "Vanished" decades earlier.
You mean to tell me that a biblical "generation" is 40 years long?
Actually, The Apostolic Burden was to preach the Gospel to the Roman Empire, and it was accomplished before Pauls ministry ended, as recorded in scripture.
Yes, and.....?
Satan will always be active infulencing unbelievers. Unbelievers will NEVER share in Christ and the Churches Victory over him. Even as He is tormented forever in the presence of the Lamb, his evil and influence is fully functioning in the Dogs, sorcerors and murderers who work their iniquity right outside New Jerusalems Gates.
How can anyone operate beyond Christ's authority without possessing authority equal or above his?
Really?
That time is now, for those of us in Full unity with Christ. His is the only name aknowledged.
Are you arguing for annhilation here?
ross3421 said:Tavita,
Check this thread out as there are really some good discussions....... Though I believe that there is no millenial reign and I guess be called Amill I do not believe that we are living in this reign today. Simply put that Christ returns and set up an eternal kingdom......
Mark.
Rafael said:There are just too many scriptures that speak of a literal millinniel reign of Messiah over the land and this world on a last "day" of the Lord or 1000 years
Isaiah 2:3 And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem.
4 And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.
Eze 37:12 Therefore prophesy and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel.
13 And ye shall know that I am the LORD, when I have opened your graves, O my people, and brought you up out of your graves,
14 And shall put my spirit in you, and ye shall live, and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I the LORD have spoken it, and performed it, saith the LORD.
ross3421 said:You need to look at these verses again.........
"Neither shall they learn war any more"
Thus it would be impossible for there to be a BATTLE during or at the end of a supposed 1000 years.
Re 20:8And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.
Mark.
A Brother In Christ said:THE ECONOMY of the 1000 years is a farm economy..
they are suppose to bring the food to the New Jersalem... there rebellion is like the european farmers bring there tractors and protesting
carminejulie said:you mean they are slaves before God punishes them in a lake of fire, (since all the elect have already been resurrected and raptured and transformed, right?
Waht is the point of delaying the eternal kingdom for an earthly one, what has NOT been accomplished already by the great commission, evangelization? HAVE not all already come out of her?
This confuses me and I wonder how one comes up to certain conclusions by direct biblical inference of why there is a delay in the eternal kingdom ....
Carmine, (confused)
ross3421 said:Does Christ come to set up a temporal kingdom?
yeshuasavedme said:Do you think the six days of evenings and mornings of the creation week were just symbolical?
Did the waters of the flood of Noah's time cover the entire earth and was he in the ark for a year ? -or is it just a symbolical year for a symbolical flood?
Did Noah have three sons and three daughters in law -or is that just a symbolical number for symbolical peeple?
Was Jesus Christ's body in the tomb for three full evenings and mornings -or is it just a symbolical three days?
Were the children of israel wandering in the desert for 40 years -or was it just a symbolical forty years?
Did Jesus Christ rise from the dead in His own human being body -or is it just a symbolical rising?
Did the first Adam exist -or is Adam symbolical? -careful on that one -lest you illusion 'yourself' out of existence.
Did God make Eve out of Adam's side -or is that a symbolical tale?
Did Jesus Christ ascend into heaven after the forty days after he rose from the dead? -or is that just a symbolical ascending?
Did Jesus really feed the four and the five thousands of men on just a few loaves and fish, multiplied -or is it all symbolical?
What is a long time? then and who is the judge of it?
In fact, if all is symbolical what is all symbolical of -and where did you get your symbolical interpretation from and are you deluded by delusions of symbols, anyway?
Satan had power and man could only cling to the promise of a Redeemer. Now death was vanquished and so is Satan's power over us.
DeaconDean said:Excuse me but I seem to remember reading a warning about Satan:
"Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:" (1 Pet. 5:8)
And that Satan is also:
"Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:" (Eph. 2:2)
Now while we are not to submit to Satan, he still is a powerful presence in this world.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?