PsychoSarah
Chaotic Neutral
Please, address the fact that people do not have to be physically close to something to see it directly.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What to you mean physically close? Again this is what it meant God covered His Glory with his hands.
If you want to see someone's face you need to be close.
LOL. What you are "seeing" is the electromagnetic waves coming off the sun.
LOL. What you are "seeing" is the electromagnetic waves coming off the sun.
When you see a tree 100 ft. away you are seeing electromagnetic waves from the sun bouncing off of the tree.
In fact, all of our other senses involve electromagnetism since all of them are based on the interaction of electrons through electromagnetism.
It's almost like you have Tourette's or you're that guy who walks around talking to himself using some of the words that he hears others saying.Electromagnetism is just a force which 'just happened'. How lucky we are.
This is like reading The Sound and the Fury except more disjointed. You know there is a point to the narrative but it is obscured by the incredible divergence from reality. At this point I am still reading these entries out of sheer morbid fascination.The stars are giving off electromagnetic waves during the daytime yet you can't see them because of the suns waves. In the same way you can't see the sun either. The same way you can't see the person at night shining a bright flashlight in your face.
How do you know they did know this?
Complex life as we understand it might be rare. Simple life might be not uncommon. Indeed, there are a couple of locations in our own solar system that might have life potentially.
What is that number and where did you get it from?
Life is already here on Earth, so the chances are 1 in 1 as they are for all events that have already happened.
The stars are giving off electromagnetic waves during the daytime yet you can't see them because of the suns waves.
Also, Once, if you want to be picky about the words being used - what about the 'foundation of the earth'?
That implies that the earth is attached to these foundations and fixed in one place, like the foundations of a house, which it clearly isn't.
He is saying exactly what I am, that there was a period of interaction of energy prior to the Big Bang, prior to inflation.
The stars are giving off electromagnetic waves during the daytime yet you can't see them because of the suns waves. In the same way you can't see the sun either. The same way you can't see the person at night shining a bright flashlight in your face.
Oncedeceived,
This will be the third time I have posted this at your request.
Alan Guth, have you heard of him? He's kind of a big deal.
"In inflationary theories the universe evolves from a very tiny initial patch. While this patch was very small, there was plenty of time for it to become uniform by the same mechanism by which a slice of pizza sitting on the table cools to room temperature: things tend to come to a uniform temperature. Once this uniformity is established on the scale of the very tiny patch, inflation can take over and magnify the patch to become large enough to encompass everything that we observe. Thus, inflation provides a very natural explanation for the uniformity of the universe."--Alan Guth, Cosmic Questions - Guth: Evidence for Inflation
He is saying exactly what I am, that there was a period of interaction of energy prior to the Big Bang, prior to inflation.
"Interaction of energy prior to the Big Bang"? Where is the singularity in all this? And does this mean that the "interaction of energy", which preceded the Big Bang, followed natural laws of today which existed before the Big Bang?
He is just incorrect about the timing of this interaction and the inflation that occurred after the Big Bang. There is no evidence of any something being nothing and most other Scientists are rather annoyed by Krauss and his ideas that ignore that the Laws of Physics and how they arise after the Big Bang.
Often the morals we claim animals have are our interpretation of an animal's behavior. (This would included rape., murder, etc.)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?