I have had enough. If I must agree with atheists then I may as well be one. YOu want me to agree with the scientific consensus? Ok. I'll be an atheist. I'm tired Christians anyway.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Alright, i'll give into the scientific consensus, so I'm not guilty of pride.
God created man millions of years ago, in the form of a lemur, or something close to it, then allowed him to slowly evolve, over millions of years, into multiple forms, until finally transforming into his present form.
Is that about right?
Um no. All living things on earth are related and share a common ancestor. Theists who accept evolution believe that God guided the process. If you want to learn more about the theist point of view for evolution, pick up Francis Collins' book "The Language of God". (He talks about other things besides evolution, but it's part of the book). Another good option, if you have Netflix is the documentary by Dr. Shubin "Your Inner Fish". It's a 3 part documentary.
The only reason I come here is because I'm so messed up that I cant go to church, why I come to forums like this I don't know. One think I sure of, I cant handle anymore nonsense. Y'all are mistaken if you think I'm going to take this crap anymore. I'm done with your contradictions and your BS.
How do I know? Because that's what an evolutionist poster told me, he said that our earliest ancestors were less intelligent than a Chimp, and that's not far from other apes. Plus, evolutionists have said that our brain is evolving into a more intellectual processor, and this explains why we are supposedly more intelligent than our ancestors.
Don't blame me, blame followers of ToE, its they who you are disagreeing with, I'm only reiterating their message.
There are other alternatives if you really need help.
The only reason I come here is because I'm so messed up that I cant go to church, why I come to forums like this I don't know. One think I sure of, I cant handle anymore nonsense. Y'all are mistaken if you think I'm going to take this crap anymore. I'm done with your contradictions and your BS.
Newton was non-orthodox, and would have even been considered illegally heterodox for his place and time.
You haven't seen tired and fed up till you have been me. I eat and breath weariness. Everyday is a struggle to hold onto hope, but i cant handle anymore contention, contradiction, politics or religion, no i cant take one more day, one more minute of this BS.
You all can have this world, you can have the religion, the politics, the whole stinking rotten thing. IM so tired that i don't even care if i die anymore. That's what life does to you after it sucks every bit of will from inside you. You cannot even begin to comprehend the hell I live with everyday. My world is is like nothing you have imagined. I dont want to talk to another Christian, Muslim, Atheist, or another political person. You Catholics, Anglicans, Atheists, Democrats and Republicans can all take a hike. Ive struggled and endured and tried, but i have nothing left. YOu can have this world and it can have my life for all i care, weariness has killed me.
The theory of evolution is based on assumption. We know that animals can evolve small changes in their features just like the the beaks of finches that Darwin observed. They could become larger and stronger to help crack the husks of seeds bu only those finches with these beaks surviving. But thats about where it stops. The ability to evolve changes in beaks , hair, size, length and even shape of face or snout are within the genetic capabilities of existing genes. But more importantly the changes dont extend beyond what would cause a cost to fitness because a creature had moved to far away from its natural state which was already best for them. Mutations are basically errors in the copying of what is already good. A mistake cannot make something better in the end even if it seems like it gives a short term advantage.
The assumption is because a finch can change its existing beak size or strength animals can also change beyond the species level and become new ones. We have observed and tested the minor changes in genetics that are within a creatures existing genetics. But we havnt observed the major changes that are claimed by evolution. This is called an assumption. Its like saying that the famous climber George Malory who was the first to attempt to climbed Mt Everest made it all the way to the top. But all that was witnessed was that he got to a certain point before the top and disappeared. His ability and fitness didn't get him to the top. He only had the ability to make it so far. But some want to assume that he made it all the way without any evidence.
A lot of the so called evidence is based on assumption and interpretation. The observational evidence which makes up a lot of it is up for interpretation and has been refuted a lot of the time. There can just many who disagree with what supporters say. What may be viewed as a transitional feature to some is also seen as a normal variation with a species to others. Evolution has been found out many times with this. What may be the fossil of the same creature found out of place in the fossil records can be made into a new species rather than be accepted as fossils out of place to one. Will be a fossil out of place which throws another spanner in the works for evolution to another. This happens a lot as well.No. As is the case with all scientific theories, it is based upon evidence.
Mountains of it.
I guess ppl will believe aliens created us...
But the best evidence is the genetic evidence and according to tests mutations cannot evolve new functional features.
Yes Einstein didn't believe in a personal God but it is interesting as to how he came to that conclusion. When he formed his theory of relativity he realized that this equation meant there had to be a beginning to the universe. But he didn't like that idea as he thought this would mean one would have to conclude that the universe was created by God. So he introduced his cosmological constant for which he said was the greatest mistake of his life. Since then we have discovered that the universe does have a beginning. So, Einstein became a believer in an impersonal creator God.
How do I know? Because that's what an evolutionist poster told me, he said that our earliest ancestors were less intelligent than a Chimp, and that's not far from other apes. Plus, evolutionists have said that our brain is evolving into a more intellectual processor, and this explains why we are supposedly more intelligent than our ancestors.
Don't blame me, blame followers of ToE, its they who you are disagreeing with, I'm only reiterating their message.
Alright, i'll give into the scientific consensus, so I'm not guilty of pride.
God created man millions of years ago, in the form of a lemur, or something close to it, then allowed him to slowly evolve, over millions of years, into multiple forms, until finally transforming into his present form.
Is that about right?