Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
As science digs deeper into things, the process of evolution, the age of the Earth and it's geological process have become clearer and better understood. Modifying theories is a good thing as it shows that science is working the way it should with increased knowledge.C'mon they thought a platypus was an intermediate species when I was a kid. Almost all of the theories have been modified. That's exactly why I brought up gradualism.
Aren't you going to tell me the fatal flaw in evolution? I dontbecpect to hear it, thst would take a genius.
Nothing special in intro biology tho. No genius needed. Average middle school will do.
Look for conjugation in paramecia for early sexual reproduction,
then try something like " evolution of multicellular organisms".
See how you do with those, before trying harder stuff.
The fatal flaw in evolution?
I’ve looked it up. You’re using tenuous speculation as if it’s proven fact, a typical ploy of evolutionist apologists.
The famous evolutionary philosopher Carl Popper once got in trouble for stating that evolution is metaphysics and not science, because it’s not falsifiable - they just jump from one hypothesis to another as they fail.
Evolution fails on many levels, not just one.
Abiogenesis has failed, but that’s being ignored.
Whereas amino acids occur naturally, though in weak concentrations, the chirality problem makes origin of a living cell in nature impossible- L hand and R hand amino acids are always present, but a living cell has to be all the same orientation - such as all left handed - and even one opposite handed amino acid makes for a non functional protein.
Since both R and L hand molecules bond together easily, abiogenesis is impossible.
Evolutionist Albert Yockey used information theory which determined abiogenesis is mathematically impossible, that the primordial soup hypothesis should therefore be discarded - yet biologists cling to it anyway, and NASA is still wanting to “follow the water” on Mars to look for origin of life in the primordial soup scenario.
Before that, Astronomer Hoyle calculated that the odds of abiogenesis creating a living cell, are equivalent to a tornado assembling a functional 737 when going through a junk yard.
The very first biology class I took when I was about 13 examined the amoeba. A single cell organism which splits in two to reproduce. I guess you were sick the day they covered Biology 101 where you come from.The
Okay, genius, show me the transition form between single cells that split in two to reproduce, and hundred trillion cell life that uses sexual reproduction.
Ah, someone else who doesn't understand evolution yet thinks they can argue against it.C'mon they thought a platypus was an intermediate species when I was a kid. Almost all of the theories have been modified. That's exactly why I brought up gradualism.
Those who believe in science investigate claims and prove that they are either true or false, I have asked several times for just exactly that, all I get in return is talking in circles in an attempt to avoid investigating the facts.A detail here- science does not do " closely held
beliefs". That is for religion. Faith, belief despite
all is a highest virtue. In science, that is intellectual
dishonesty, anti science.
To say someone in science will dismiss challenges
to closely held beliefs is to say they are complete phonies,
enemies of science.
No doubt such exist, as do pedophile priests and othrrs
who use the church as cover for their crimes.
To suggest that these aberrant individuals represent
either church or science is itself immoral, being
as it is, a lie.
Just another excuse to avoid facts.You posts were not refuted because they were not on topic. If you have anything which addresses the OP, post it.
I’ve looked it up.
Whereas amino acids occur naturally, though in weak concentrations, the chirality problem makes origin of a living cell in nature impossible- L hand and R hand amino acids are always present, but a living cell has to be all the same orientation - such as all left handed - and even one opposite handed amino acid makes for a non functional protein.
Since both R and L hand molecules bond together easily, abiogenesis is impossible.
Those who believe in science investigate claims and prove that they are either true or false, I have asked several times for just exactly that, all I get in return is talking in circles in an attempt to avoid investigating the facts.
I suggest you go back and read the post I was responding to and my post, clearly you are not following the discussion.Another mistake that shows your lack of understanding of the subject. The discussion is about the theory of evolution. One doesn't prove theories. They are explanations of agreed evidence.
So you don't get to disprove a theory. You only get to offer a better explanation. Which, apart from 'God did it', has been missing in action for some time, I'm afraid.
You were the one who brought the term 'prove' to the table. The post to which you responded did not mention it. And as we are talking about a theory I think it relevant to point out to you that the term 'proof' isn't applicable.I suggest you go back and read the post I was responding to and my post, clearly you are not following the discussion.
Try posting something related to the OP. The articles you posted all seemed to relate to proof of the existence of God. Or if you really want to discuss proof of the existence of God instead of creationism v. evolution, take it to the theism v. atheism board where the subject is more appropriate.Just another excuse to avoid facts.
Those who believe in science investigate claims and prove that they are either true or false, I have asked several times for just exactly that, all I get in return is talking in circles in an attempt to avoid investigating the facts.
The same thing you do: polystrate fossils.Try a fresh start? What do you have?
Talk of " ploy" and various other false and / or nvidiousI’ve looked it up. You’re using tenuous speculation as if it’s proven fact, a typical ploy of evolutionist apologists.
The famous evolutionary philosopher Carl Popper once got in trouble for stating that evolution is metaphysics and not science, because it’s not falsifiable - they just jump from one hypothesis to another as they fail.
Evolution fails on many levels, not just one.
Abiogenesis has failed, but that’s being ignored.
Whereas amino acids occur naturally, though in weak concentrations, the chirality problem makes origin of a living cell in nature impossible- L hand and R hand amino acids are always present, but a living cell has to be all the same orientation - such as all left handed - and even one opposite handed amino acid makes for a non functional protein.
Since both R and L hand molecules bond together easily, abiogenesis is impossible.
Evolutionist Albert Yockey used information theory which determined abiogenesis is mathematically impossible, that the primordial soup hypothesis should therefore be discarded - yet biologists cling to it anyway, and NASA is still wanting to “follow the water” on Mars to look for origin of life in the primordial soup scenario.
Before that, Astronomer Hoyle calculated that the odds of abiogenesis creating a living cell, are equivalent to a tornado assembling a functional 737 when going through a junk yard.
I don't have anything against religious beliefs in and of themselves, but it does make me both laugh and also raise a sadness of what creationists are teaching their children with such cartoonist analogies. When you call evolution "magic" you are degrading not only evolution but all of science which is not a good lesson for children.Lol, magic time!
That's exactly what happens with Sponges and colonial organisms. Did you not know that?And there are no transitional forms between single cell and multiple trillion celled life - there are no two cell, fou cell, hundred cell, etc life forms.
It's not hard to spot guesswork.
And I've been observing nature first hand for 40 plus years. Not in a laboratory. I have more field time than most biology students.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?