Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Pretty much an insult to such God as there may be to ignorantlyThe earth is telling us a different story.
Why not? If you can believe in "imbedded age" they can believe in "imbedded evolution." But most Christians didn't regard the literal inerrancy of Genesis to be essential to their faith before they ever heard of evolution.So they can keep their job?
Proclaiming that the theory of evolution denies the existence of God makes creationists sound more important to themselves than the truth--that it merely pokes holes in some of their theology.Pretty much an insult to such God as there may be to ignorantly
ceny the record written into the earth itself, in favour of the
so- arrogant belief in personal infallibility- in science and Bible reading.
Imbedded [sic] Evolution is Omphalism.Why not? If you can believe in "imbedded age" they can believe in "imbedded evolution." But most Christians didn't regard the literal inerrancy of Genesis to be essential to their faith before they ever heard of evolution.
If you know all that much about science then you know that atheistic materialism is not a necessary requirement of evolutionary biology or of science in general. There are too many theists working in the field for that to be so. And, as you have pointed out, there are even creationists who do understand evolution. Dr. Todd Wood comes to mind...
A Tale of Three Creationists - Articles
I don't see how the (implied) alternative, ie: a 'supernatural creator' can be a viably testable definition in science, so that notion is excluded by the methodology.That’s the point: real science doesn’t require atheism and naturalistic bias - yet the field of evolution has been hijacked by atheism.
Thus the fact that common ancestry is explainable by a common creator, can’t even be mentioned, let alone considered as one of two possibilities.
What disproves your claim , is the video that exist of Collin Patterson saying exactly that.
No cigar for you.
You do not seem to understand that many more fossils have been found since the time that PE was proposed. It is still a well accepted hypothesis, that there are periods of very rapid evolution, and it is now supported by transitional fossils.
Of course part of the problem is the denial of science by creationists. They cannot afford to understand the concept of scientific evidence, nor can they afford to understand the concept of transitional species either.
Of course when transitional fossils are provided then creationists demand to see transitionals between the transitionals.
Actually you did quote mine him.
Do you not know what a quote mine is? The spin comes from the quote miners.
You do not seem to understand that many more fossils have been found since the time that PE was proposed. It is still a well accepted hypothesis, that there are periods of very rapid evolution, and it is now supported by transitional fossils.
Of course part of the problem is the denial of science by creationists. They cannot afford to understand the concept of scientific evidence, nor can they afford to understand the concept of transitional species either.
Of course when transitional fossils are provided then creationists demand to see transitionals between the transitionals.
You might want to brush up on your research, because none of that it correct.
Hint, the appearance of "complex" eyes pre-date the Cambrian.
Second hint, squid didn't exist in the Cambrian - some cephalopod ancestor species can be traced to the late Cambrian.
Spriggina, Marywadea and Kimberella are annoyed at you right now.
You do understand that it was christian clergy who first proposed an Earth over a million years old... Yes?So I heard.
Tell that to Mary Shweitzer.That’s the point: real science doesn’t require atheism and naturalistic bias - yet the field of evolution has been hijacked by atheism.
And embedded age is not?Imbedded [sic] Evolution is Omphalism.
No, atheism has been thrust upon evolution by creationists like you.That’s the point: real science doesn’t require atheism and naturalistic bias - yet the field of evolution has been hijacked by atheism.
Because they are separate questions. A common creator is possible with both special creation and evolution. A creator is not an argument against evolution.Thus the fact that common ancestry is explainable by a common creator, can’t even be mentioned, let alone considered as one of two possibilities.
The constant litany around here is that if you understood evolution you would have better argument against it.And the constant litany from evolutionists claiming that we can’t possibly understand science or we’d be evolution proponents, is beyond ludicrous.
Which would mean that God is lying to us. And God can't lie, so there must be something else going on.Imbedded [sic] Evolution is Omphalism.
Well it might be stated that if he understood evolution he might not be arguing against it.No, atheism has been thrust upon evolution by creationists like you.
Because they are separate questions. A common creator is possible with both special creation and evolution. A creator is not an argument against evolution.
The constant litany around here is that if you understood evolution you would have better argument against it.
That's an excessive statement of non-truth.....yet the field of evolution has been hijacked by atheism.
Which would mean that God is lying to us. And God can't lie, so there must be something else going on.
This dance feels familiar.
Well it might be stated that if he understood evolution he might not be arguing against it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?