Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I do not have to observe things personally. Thats the advantage of society.Tell me Mr science man, what have you personally observed that proves The Bible creation descriptions should not be believe literately.
I do not have to observe things personally. Thats the advantage of society.
For example, I accept the human anatomy, even though I did not open myself to look at it personally.
No, I believe the scientific consensus over your personal misunderstanding of the language of the Bible.
You can believe whatever you want, of course.No i do not misunderstand any creation descriptions, i believe what The Bible states as given.
What scientific approach do you propose regarding eternal life? How would you test it?Since you believe in science so much, why not look to science for your approach to eternal life salvation. Surely if science is so correct about God's creation, then obviously they must have better information on salvation also.
So basically you believe science over God's word.
Mine? You mean ours? You are using internet, its science, not magic. You cannot observe electrons and data in optical cables under oceans or from satellites personally, but they are there.Science is your area.
Mine? You mean ours? You are using internet, its science, not magic. You cannot observe electrons and data in optical cables under oceans or from satellites personally, but they are there.
Regarding eternal life and science, I hope you are beginning to understand where you got it wrong - theology cannot be tested scientifically, because its not physical. The physical world we live in can be tested scientifically, because we have physical eyes and bodies that can interact with it.
Edit: English
I am not your man for taking photos of planets. Please, contact ESA or your NASA for that.No ours to it, you are the one (among others) "because someone has created a computer or shot a rocket up into the air" puts science over The Bible's creations accounts. I can separate out the constructions/inventions (bridge, cars, etc..) made using math, etc.. from the fabricated and outlandish claims of men of science about God's creation.
...Like i said what have you observed of God's creation that will allow you to make that statement or have the belief. That the descriptions given in The Bible are not accurate and truthful descriptions of God's creation.
...I have personally recorded (with a camera) the star jupiter and know it is not like the images (a spherical planet) science portrays the star to be.
Post your video of a Jupiter like the image(below) from science moving across the sky.
View attachment 332429
After years of seeing hundreds of experiments either reflected or performed by so many sources who put their work online for others to witness, such as Dr. John D, Kyle Adams, Taboo Conspiracy, Globebusters, Jeranism, Witsit, DITRH, p-brane, and just dozens and dozens more, there come a point when you realize that all the science the globe actually has are created images, swirling toilets, and inconclusive stick experiments.
They aren't picking science over God, because there isn't any science there. They are choosing man's opinion only.
Lol just because you claim it is fake doesn’t make it so. What does anyone gain from lying about it? NASA would only be discrediting their self by doing so and have nothing to gain as a result of it. You look at the photo and say it’s fake based on absolutely no evidence at all.-Right, there are many painted (computer or hand) rendered illusions to feed the ones looking to be deceived.
I remember the Halloween sun, what a fake.
Sunsets can’t happen on a flat earth. Flat earthers still can’t produce a flat map of the earth that is to scale, that’s why in their preposterous model Australia is roughly 4 times bigger than Asia which is retarded. And South America is roughly 4 times bigger than North America which is also ridiculous.
The sun doesn’t go away to where it’s not visible it goes down below the ground. Even at the ocean you can see it go down below the water. That can’t happen on a flat earth.It's just a matter of perspective with the sun going away and no longer being viewable, which is perfectly acceptable in the flat earth paradigm. If you are referencing the Gleason map, that's because that map is an azimuthal equidistant map, based on globe projections. That's not to scale for either a globe or a flat earth. It's that way because the globers can't produce a flat map that is to scale.
No ours to it, you are the one (among others) "because someone has created a computer or shot a rocket up into the air" puts science over The Bible's creations accounts. I can separate out the constructions/inventions (bridge, cars, etc..) made using math, etc.. from the fabricated and outlandish claims of men of science about God's creation.
...Like i said what have you observed of God's creation that will allow you to make that statement or have the belief. That the descriptions given in The Bible are not accurate and truthful descriptions of God's creation.
...I have personally recorded (with a camera) the star jupiter and know it is not like the images (a spherical planet) science portrays the star to be.
Post your video of a Jupiter like the image(below) from science moving across the sky.
View attachment 332429
The sun doesn’t go away to where it’s not visible it goes down below the ground. Even at the ocean you can see it go down below the water. That can’t happen on a flat earth.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?