Is the Biden administration interfering with the election?

[Laodicean60]

Both parties are corrupt ...

Amen! But we choose to ignore our own. It's going to another 9/11 or a severe economic event to get people to be like-minded for a week.

 

[Valletta]

And this is a bad thing because..?

I consider violations of U.S. law a bad thing. Joe is supposed to be acting within the law, he took an oath to God to uphold the Constitution and thus the laws of the land. Using taxpayer money for political purposes, or federal employees violating the Hatch Act, is prohibited.

 

[Hazelelponi]

If Biden says that inflation was 9% when he took office, that was easily shown to be 'misinformation'. When Trump said 'In February alone, nearly 1 million jobs held by native-born Americans disappeared' the same applies.

How difficult do you see this being? Why can't an honest bi-partisan group fulfill that need?

They could.

The allegations are that this isn't being done by fair minded non partisans. If it was I'm sure there wouldn't be the concern here, as they said this is being done by far left activists not fairminded individuals as being why it's mentioned as concerning.

 

[Hazelelponi]

Amen! But we choose to ignore our own. It's going to another 9/11 or a severe economic event to get people to be like-minded for a week.

Not even that will help.

 

[Valletta]

Who are these "approved outside groups"?
What are the alleged "sweeping election policy changes"?

Could they possibly involve registering more citizens to vote? I suppose that activity is now viewed as "election interference". SMH

It appears that that hard left-wing groups are involved, with people that advocate voting for illegals. An encouragement to vote by the government should be strictly non-partisan.

 

[Always in His Presence]

I am 100% for voter registration and even voting by mail with two caveats:

1. Registration and ballots must be requested by the voter and mailed to their residence -
2. Registration and voting must include the voters Social Security Number (last 4 is OK) and signature.

Since they are already attesting to their citizenship and all citizens have Social Security numbers - it would be a no brainer and number could be checked against socials that are associated with non citizens.

Both sides would be satisfied.

 

[Valletta]

I am 100% for voter registration and even voting by mail with two caveats:

1. Registration and ballots must be requested by the voter and mailed to their residence -
2. Registration and voting must include the voters Social Security Number (last 4 is OK) and signature.

Since they are already attesting to their citizenship and all citizens have Social Security numbers - it would be a no brainer and number could be checked against socials that are associated with non citizens.

Both sides would be satisfied.

That sounds like a very good plan, something along those lines. But be aware that more and more non-citizens are receiving social security numbers from the Biden administration. There is great concern because the Biden administration is already violating the immigration laws and the order by the Supreme Court on student loans, so what's to stop from them just ignoring non-citizens voting? I would add pre-registration where an individual needs to do more than just sign a statement claiming they are a citizen. I don't want millions of unregistered non-citizens showing up to vote on election day, claiming they are citizens.

 

[Hans Blaster]

I consider violations of U.S. law a bad thing. Joe is supposed to be acting within the law, he took an oath to God to uphold the Constitution and thus the laws of the land. Using taxpayer money for political purposes, or federal employees violating the Hatch Act, is prohibited.

Encouraging voting is not a political purpose.

 

[Hans Blaster]

I am 100% for voter registration and even voting by mail with two caveats:

1. Registration and ballots must be requested by the voter and mailed to their residence -
2. Registration and voting must include the voters Social Security Number (last 4 is OK) and signature.

Since they are already attesting to their citizenship and all citizens have Social Security numbers - it would be a no brainer and number could be checked against socials that are associated with non citizens.

Both sides would be satisfied.

I already sign the book every time I vote.

A SSN is not ID.
Having a SSN does not indicate anyone is a citizen. Lots of foreigners do, including everyone that I interact with regularly. (Because the have jobs)

 

[Valletta]

Encouraging voting is not a political purpose.

Correct. Using government money for political purposes is the part that is illegal.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Correct. Using government money for political purposes is the part that is illegal.

Using government money to encourage voter registration and participation is not political or illegal.

 

[wing2000]

It appears that that hard left-wing groups are involved, with people that advocate voting for illegals. An encouragement to vote by the government should be strictly non-partisan.

Which groups?

 

[Bradskii]

I consider violations of U.S. law a bad thing. Joe is supposed to be acting within the law, he took an oath to God to uphold the Constitution and thus the laws of the land. Using taxpayer money for political purposes, or federal employees violating the Hatch Act, is prohibited.

Increasing the number of citizens that vote is not against the constitution. If you have some details of anything illegal that the current administration is doing or wants to do then can you please present it?

 

[Bradskii]

They could.

The allegations are that this isn't being done by fair minded non partisans. If it was I'm sure there wouldn't be the concern here, as they said this is being done by far left activists not fairminded individuals as being why it's mentioned as concerning.

But they gave no examples of who was likely doing it and what they were doing. Some details would be instructive. In fact, nothing can be said for or against this until we have some.

 

[Bradskii]

It’s a slippery slope to censorship.

It's nothing to do with censorship whatsoever. That is a nonsensical argument.

 

[Pommer]

Correct. Using government money for political purposes is the part that is illegal.

Not just political purposes, but partisan political purposes.

 

[stevil]

And this is a bad thing because..?

Because Republicans believe they are more likely to win the election if they suppress certain demographics from voting.

 

[Valletta]

Because Republicans believe they are more likely to win the election if they suppress certain demographics from voting.

Those demographics being illegals.

 

[stevil]

Those demographics being illegals.

Well that's idiotic.
Illegal or undocumented immigrants can't vote. It isn't a voting demographic and never has been.

 

[Valletta]

Well that's idiotic.
Illegal or undocumented immigrants can't vote. It isn't a voting demographic and never has been.

I know that in Washington D.C. it is legal for illegals to vote for mayor and city council members. And how many illegals will be voting for president despite the laws against it we do not know.