Brooklyn Knight
On a narrow road but not narrow minded
- Nov 21, 2011
- 4,438
- 187
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Engaged
- Politics
- US-Others
Having sex (in the context of a marriage or not) isn't really the issue that I'm trying to get at here, nor is actually killing or hurting people. It's about the fantasy of playing these games and/or viewing inappropriate content.
The thing with the former is that it's still fantasy, whereas with inappropriate content...you're still left with inappropriate content no matter which way you try to spin it.
I think if you want to compare something with actual inappropriate content, then you would have to bring-up snuff films. But of course, I'm going along with watching said materials.
If I fantasize about killing my boss (which I wouldn't really do...I have a pretty great one), and picture him as the victim when I play video games, is that more moral than fantasizing about having sex? I'm not saying playing violent video games is wrong, just that to me, fantasizing about violence using video games as a tool is not a lot different than fantasizing about sex using inappropriate contentographic materials as a tool.
I don't think fantasizing about sex or nudity is wrong, just as some people who fantasize something bad happening to someone who may have irritated them really isn't bad...at first. It's when you continuously have said thoughts that it becomes a problem.
I have a good friend who was discussing how troubled she was by the popularity of the 50 Shades of Gray books and how she would never read them. She had read the Hunger Games books, though. I told her that I was a bit confused...in 50 Shades of Gray, the story includes graphical descriptions of consensual sex between adults, and in the Hunger Games, there are graphical descriptions of the murder of innocent children. How is the first one sinful and the second just fine (even for teens?)
Again, I think the disgust with one over the other is that we are more likely to have sex than pickup a firearm or kill. It's true that with regards to violence, we take on this Wild West approach whereas with nudity/sex we are more Puritan America.
I didn't read 50 Shades but I did read Chuck Palahniuk's "Choke" and I did read a book that only had like two paragraphs but was close to 200 pgs. and it also involved an explicit sex scene. I would say leaving the reader to their imagination still isn't as bad as actually showing said sex scenes.
And there are movies - not inappropriate content - out there that have encroached into showing full penetration or other sex acts.
Upvote
0