EmSw
White Horse Rider
There is no need for "further" sacrifice since the sacrifice of Jesus is the only sacrifice acceptable to God and it has been done once for all.
There is no need for any sacrifice. Many, many people were saved without Jesus' sacrifice. Why do you fail to see this, Marvin?
Jesus doesn't need to be sacrificed "again" since His acceptable sacrifice was once and for all.
He didn't need to be sacrificed at all.
That is not the same as saying that "Jesus didn't need to be sacrificed" - and you know it.
Why do believe He needed to be sacrificed? Since it's so important to you, why didn't Jesus mention Himself being a sacrifice even once? NEVER, NEVER, NEVER did He mention Himself being a sacrifice. Was there another Jesus which mentioned himself a sacrifice?
You are so intent on being seen as worthy of salvation because of your ongoing works that you can't bring yourself to believe what forgiveness means.
You have yet to tell us what forgiveness means. Is this intentional? Since you do not want to face the truth, I will give you the meaning of forgiveness from Strong's.
remission, forgiveness, deliverance, liberty
- release from bondage or imprisonment
- forgiveness or pardon, of sins (letting them go as if they had never been committed), remission of the penalty
Come on Marvin, I expect better things from you.
Repentance is a necessary part in receiving the sacrifice of Jesus Christ once for all for your sins.
Here you go again. The Bible does not say what you say. Nowhere will you find repentance is necessary in receiving the sacrifice. Is this what systematic theology is? Do you get to make things up as you go? I would suggest you stay as far as possible from that type of belief.
Without the shedding of Christ's blood once for all there is no forgiveness of sins.
Well, well, well. You now are giving something that is in the Bible. Let's see what Jesus says about that, shall we?
Luke 22:20
Likewise He also took the cup after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is shed for you.
Do you not see it is the cup, in which is His blood, which is shed for us? Nothing about a sacrifice or a cross. Do you ever wonder what 'cup' means spiritually? Do you ever wonder what 'blood' means spiritually? In the natural, it is only a cup and blood.
Since Jesus said to drink His blood, surely you don't take it as natural blood, do you? Maybe you do, who knows.
Without your acceptance of the shedding of Christ's blood as the only remedy for sin there will be no forgiveness of sins for you.
Again, your systematic theology assures you make crazy statements like this. The remedy for sin is repentance for remission, and casting away all your transgressions. But of course, systematic theology doesn't acknowledge this verse from Ezekiel.
Repent of your own works as the remedy for your sins and receive the Savior and His acceptable necessary sacrifice as your only hope.
NOPE! I don't believe that Roger. If you show us where Jesus said He would be a sacrifice for our sins, I might consider it. But you won't find it, and have to add to what Jesus said in order to satisfy your beliefs.
Wasn't a sacrifice supposed to be unblemished? Wasn't Jesus marred beyond recognition? Was His back blemished with scourges? On this basis, His supposed sacrifice would not have been accepted.
Also, where was a sacrifice to be offered, on a pagan's cross? NOPE! Again, His supposed sacrifice would not have been accepted. Did any sacrifice give its own life for anyone? NOPE! Read up on OT sacrifices and maybe you will see Jesus was anything but a sacrifice.
Upvote
0