Is it true that the scientists discovered parallel worlds, and who lives in them?

[Larniavc]

Today the people are not complete, they are divided. They have replaced the call of the heart, the emotions with the mental reasoning. You just hate me, so you do say these mean things?

Disagreement with you is not hate.

 

[yeshuaslavejeff]

You can't use a movie to prove your point. Sorry but I completely disagree with you.

... hmmmm.... so no ooompa loompas either ?

 

[joinfree]

Disagreement with you is not hate.

Tell us the subject of disagreement.

 

[joinfree]

No.

[/thread].

So, there are no particular problems with the article, you just hate all thing together? But is the hatred spread the same level through the text, or some parts of the text is less hateable? What are these parts? My top CV perhaps?

 

[Strathos]

So, there are no particular problems with the article, you just hate all thing together? But is the hatred spread the same level through the text, or some parts of the text is less hateable? What are these parts? My top CV perhaps?

The question asked in your thread title. That's the answer.

 

[joinfree]

The question asked in your thread title. That's the answer.

What about the text of the article? The text of the article proves the title of it. Learn this way in scientific journals. What is wrong about my text? Today the people are not complete, they are divided. They have replaced the call of the heart, the emotions with the mental reasoning, and vice versa. And they do troll the promising authors without noticing the own troll's hate speech. You just hate me, so you do say these mean things? So, there are no particular problems with the article, you just hate all thing together? But is the hatred spread the same level through the text, or some parts of the text is less hateable? What are these parts? My top CV perhaps?

 

[Strathos]

The text of your post seems to be completely incoherent. And I don't hate you.

 

[yeshuaslavejeff]

Shalom

 

[joinfree]

The text of your post seems to be completely incoherent. And I don't hate you.

1) Nobody is indifferent,
2) You have written mean thing,
3) Thus, you hate me.

 

[Strathos]

1) Nobody is indifferent,
2) You have written mean thing,
3) Thus, you hate me.

What?

 

[yeshuaslavejeff]

What?

Simplify >>>>
"Is it true that the scientists discovered parallel worlds, and who lives in them?"

Answer: No

 

[joinfree]

What?

Are you complaining that the world is completely indifferent of you? Worse: the world PRETENDS that it is indifferent. Fact: a person does not have a price. People do not have price tags. Well, look at the passers-by. Where do you PHYSICALLY see the stickers "today I have a 10 percent discount." A person AGREES to do you a favor for $ 10. Therefore, this is not the price of a person. The fact is that Christians still live in the Christian Civilization with its harmonious and verified concepts. Man is infinitely valuable in the eyes of Jesus Christ. Therefore, we must think correctly, according to the Christ: a person does not have a price. Therefore, even in the beer stand we tell the seller "thank you."

 

[Larniavc]

Tell us the subject of disagreement.

That travelling to another universe is impossible.

You said so, yourself. I’m surprised you have forgotten.

 

[joinfree]

That travelling to another universe is impossible.

You said so, yourself. I’m surprised you have forgotten.

There can I buy a ticket? Nowhere, right? But the scientific proof is in the text:

3. Dark Matter is the parallel worlds inside our Universe.

Have you watched fantastic films, when a super-hero saves the world that has left the reel, returning to the past and changing this terrible future? (For example, the movie "Terminator" with Schwarzenegger). Yes. But have you ever been worried about the fate of all the people who led our hero into the past? Yes. This anxiety is the work of our subconscious. I'll tell you a secret: all these people are dead. The super-hero killed them all. And since a person can not be both dead and alive, travel to the past is forbidden. By whom? Physics allows it, just use any portal. It is forbidden by the True God.

I will prove that the past that we remember can not be changed. Suppose the hero returned to the 41st year and killed Hitler. Then Marshal Zhukov, living to the 41st year, did not fight with Hitler. All the changes in the history of the past for Marshal Zhukov will be recorded on his life line. And if so, the world around Marshal Zhukov does not disappear anywhere. And if so, then all the memories of Marshal Zhukov can not be changed. All the apparent changes in history and the effect of Mandela is deception and fraud from demons.

Hence, it is impossible to travel through parallel Universes (after all, you enter there at some point, and therefore you change its history).

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

I...The idea of the multiverse or parallel universes is a theoretical construct, not theoretic in the sense of a theory developed out of observable phenomena but theoretic in the sense of imaginary. It’s a way of trying to get around the impossibility of the universe we live in happening by chance.

This isn't the case. There is a variety of hypothesised multiverse types and, as far as I'm aware, all of them are theoretical predictions or extrapolations based on currently successful empirical physical models. Most of them were proposed well before the appearance of fine-tuning became a hot topic (assuming that's what you meant by your last sentence), and some are simply irrelevant to it.

As to the idea that it's impossible that our universe happened by chance, that's unsupported speculation; it may or may not be the case. It's not a scientific position, and consequently few scientists, if any, would hold to it - so from the physicist's viewpoint there's no impossibility to 'get around', but simply observations to explain, and certain kinds of multiverse do provide potential explanations.

 

[Tom 1]

This isn't the case. There is a variety of hypothesised multiverse types and, as far as I'm aware, all of them are theoretical predictions or extrapolations based on currently successful empirical physical models. Most of them were proposed well before the appearance of fine-tuning became a hot topic (assuming that's what you meant by your last sentence), and some are simply irrelevant to it.

As to the idea that it's impossible that our universe happened by chance, that's unsupported speculation; it may or may not be the case. It's not a scientific position, and consequently few scientists, if any, would hold to it - so from the physicist's viewpoint there's no impossibility to 'get around', but simply observations to explain, and certain kinds of multiverse do provide potential explanations.

Haha yeah I need to rethink. That was based on a documentary I watched quite a while ago. Not sure, the documentary consisted of interviews with a number of well known scientists, mostly physicists, well known in the UK in any case. The general thrust of the program was that physics had led to a point where many working in the field were finding it increasingly difficult to avoid the idea of a creator behind it all, and the parallel worlds theory seemed like a way out. I suppose things have changed since then.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

Haha yeah I need to rethink. That was based on a documentary I watched quite a while ago. Not sure, the documentary consisted of interviews with a number of well known scientists, mostly physicists, well known in the UK in any case. The general thrust of the program was that physics had led to a point where many working in the field were finding it increasingly difficult to avoid the idea of a creator behind it all, and the parallel worlds theory seemed like a way out. I suppose things have changed since then.

I reckon a documentary maker would have to pick their physicists pretty carefully to give that impression - or use plenty of selective quoting... but sadly that's what a lot of documentary makers do for channels like Discovery, etc. He who pays the piper calls the tune...

 

[yeshuaslavejeff]

I reckon a documentary maker would have to pick their physicists pretty carefully to give that impression - or use plenty of selective quoting... but sadly that's what a lot of documentary makers do for channels like Discovery, etc. He who pays the piper calls the tune...

That's RIGHT ! Dwell on this a while, think about what Yahweh thinks of all that happening...... it just might work out....

 

[joinfree]

That's RIGHT ! Dwell on this a while, think about what Yahweh thinks of all that happening...... it just might work out....

No, one must ask for the great divine wonder to become theist.

 

[Larniavc]

There can I buy a ticket? Nowhere, right? But the scientific proof is in the text:

You appear to be confused.

I never said that you could.