• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is it Ever Okay to Kill

Mediate

Only Borrowed
Jan 31, 2013
682
26
✟15,992.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
It's a tough debate.

I do see what people are saying, but I have to also admit, that Jesus is the perfect human being and I never recall Jesus ever being violent, except for the time he was angry that people were 'defiling the temple'. Mocking God. Playing and gambling and selling in the church against God's permission. It makes me wonder, had they all excuses and little legal loopholes and 'reasons' for sinning in the church? Saying 'we thought it was okay'? Jesus basically told them 'My father's name can't be desecrated like this. It's not okay to do this'.

There's always a legal loophole That's why 'the law' is likened to 'forbidden fruit'. It's so easy to say 'I am allowed by the law'. But sometimes, the righteous thing is not always what's 'permissible' by the law. It's lawful and just to beget eye for eye, yet God himself, instead of sacrificing sinners for the wage that we owed, gave us his son, who was beaten, brutalized and brought to death by those whom he died for!

So using the law as an excuse may be 'lawful', but it is not in true spirit. This is what some apostles called 'eating swine's flesh'. It's using the law to cover bad moral standing.

As Paul tells us in his first letter to Corinth, the weak among the world, the outcasts, oppressed and rejects are blessed and to be shown to shame the aggressors and the 'wise of the ways of the world'. 'you came into my house, I am allowed to beat you', may be lawful response, but not righteous.

I say revenge is God's to have. A crime committed against me (trespassing, assault) should not be met with violence as eye for eye. But rather as forgiveness.

It's funny that we use the same concept 'you hurt me, so I'll CHOOSE whether to forgive you or not', for forgiveness itself, the same as 'maybe I'll choose to shoot you or 'not murder' you instead..

Against the eastern ethos of 'You're wrong is not part of me. So I will not become part of your wrong. Take my eye, I will not take yours. I am not you. And my anger at this only makes me closer to evil'.

This life isn't the end. And it's very easy to think that it is sometimes.
 
Upvote 0
May 2, 2012
43
1
California
✟22,772.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
As a Christian, I do not believe it is ever acceptable for one person to kill another person. What are your thoughts?

We disagree there buddy.

Is it ever acceptable (moral, good, etc.) to take a person's life?

Yes it is.

If you think/believe it can be acceptable, under what circumstances would it be permitted?

Anyone that stands in way of the Lord and His work should be killed. Anyone that worships a false idol (including atheists) should be killed without hesitation.
 
Upvote 0

jminnesota

Newbie
Sep 4, 2012
1,203
29
US
✟24,133.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
well i feel if your life is in danger then its ok to kill the person that is trying to hurt you. my wife and i have a gun in the house and if anyone ever broke in and tryed to hurt us we would shoot if we needed to. or if i am not here and someone broke in and was going to rape my wife i would want her to be able to protect herself.
 
Upvote 0
May 2, 2012
43
1
California
✟22,772.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
well i feel if your life is in danger then its ok to kill the person that is trying to hurt you. my wife and i have a gun in the house and if anyone ever broke in and tryed to hurt us we would shoot if we needed to. or if i am not here and someone broke in and was going to rape my wife i would want her to be able to protect herself.

Amen.
 
Upvote 0

Leere

Newbie
Mar 22, 2011
740
13
✟15,988.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Others
Anyone that stands in way of the Lord and His work should be killed. Anyone that worships a false idol (including atheists) should be killed without hesitation.

I'm not sure we're talking about the same Christ here. Which one do you worship again?:confused:
 
Upvote 0

QueSi

Well-Known Member
Jan 15, 2013
1,511
41
Mississippi
✟2,027.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
revrobor said:
Babies can be neither atheists nor agnostics as they are not capable of denying nor being uncertain of the existence of God.

Ok so at what point does a person become agnostic/ atheist if never told about religion?
 
Upvote 0

revrobor

Veteran
Jun 24, 2003
3,993
367
93
Checotah, OK
Visit site
✟28,505.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Ok so at what point does a person become agnostic/ atheist if never told about religion?

Most teachers say 12 years is when a child can be held responsible. The Bible says in Romans 1: 18-20 that God has revealed Himself to mankind in His creation so they will be without excuse for denying God on judgement day. Telling someone about "religion" will not benefit anyone. There is no salvation in any religion. We need to tell people about what God has done for them through Jesus.
 
Upvote 0

Max S Cherry

Seeker
Dec 13, 2012
362
4
United States
✟23,231.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We disagree there buddy.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts, and yes, we definitely disagree.

Anyone that stands in way of the Lord and His work should be killed. Anyone that worships a false idol (including atheists) should be killed without hesitation.

Perhaps, they "deserve" to be killed, or better yet, they deserve to perish, as do we all. But that is not to say that they should be killed, and it certainly does not indicate that we should be the ones to kill them.
 
Upvote 0