Hey there folks
I've tried this several times on this forum already over the years. Every time though, it ended up in a beat-around-the-bush fest.
Let's see if it goes differently this time.
In this thread, I'ld like to have ID proponents to apply their "id theory" to a couple of examples and show us step by step how they conclude design (or not) using this method.
Please apply this "method" to the following objects:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Please use "ID methodology" to determine which one of these was designed and which were naturally formed.
If you can't for some reason, please explain that reason.
Note that I'm not actually that interested in the conclusions. What I'm interested in, is how you got to the conclusion! I want to see HOW ID can/should be applied. Specifically. This exercise is about a demo of the method.
I look forward to the arguments.
Tnx
I've tried this several times on this forum already over the years. Every time though, it ended up in a beat-around-the-bush fest.
Let's see if it goes differently this time.
In this thread, I'ld like to have ID proponents to apply their "id theory" to a couple of examples and show us step by step how they conclude design (or not) using this method.
Please apply this "method" to the following objects:
A.
B.
C.
D.
Please use "ID methodology" to determine which one of these was designed and which were naturally formed.
If you can't for some reason, please explain that reason.
Note that I'm not actually that interested in the conclusions. What I'm interested in, is how you got to the conclusion! I want to see HOW ID can/should be applied. Specifically. This exercise is about a demo of the method.
I look forward to the arguments.
Tnx