• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is Hell Really Eternal? (2)

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
No need to read my mind. I quoted the portion of the Jewish Encyclopedia, Gehenna (your source) that I was referring to in my post #6.

The parts about hell that you don't believe in.

I think this is one of the posts you accused me of not responding to. First please explain to me why I must do what you fail to do yourself? If you think I should post evidence from my sources which support the alternate view, then you need to do the same. Any time you post a Hell: no! argument you must also post arguments which support the alternate view. I'm waiting!
 
Upvote 0

seeingeyes

Newbie
Nov 29, 2011
8,944
809
Backwoods, Ohio
✟35,360.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I think this is one of the posts you accused me of not responding to. First please explain to me why I must do what you fail to do yourself? If you think I should post evidence from my sources which support the alternate view, then you need to do the same. Any time you post a Hell: no! argument you must also post arguments which support the alternate view. I'm waiting!

I'm claiming that you don't believe your own argument!
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I'm claiming that you don't believe your own argument!

How absolutely absurd! Seems to me that you are arguing that I'm doing something wrong if I don't give equal time to the opposing views. Why should I, you don't? Unlike others, perhaps even you, I don't try to argue that the Jews never, ever believed anything but the view I quoted. One of the primary purposes for my Jewish Encyclopedia/Talmud posts is to counter the oft repeated argument that the Jews never believed in hell. Here are links to my previous posts, #1000, #882, #879, and #869 in the original "Is Hell Really Eternal" thread. I'm not sure what your purpose was in mentioning them.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7789990-100/#post65872829

http://www.christianforums.com/t7789990-89/#post65838018

http://www.christianforums.com/t7789990-87/#post65833727

http://www.christianforums.com/t7789990-88/#post65837979
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟48,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

seeingeyes

Newbie
Nov 29, 2011
8,944
809
Backwoods, Ohio
✟35,360.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How absolutely absurd! Seems to me that you are arguing that I'm doing something wrong if I don't give equal time to the opposing views. Why should I, you don't? Unlike others, perhaps even you, I don't try to argue that the Jews never, ever believed anything but the view I quoted. One of the primary purposes for my Jewish Encyclopedia/Talmud posts is to counter the oft repeated argument that the Jews never believed in hell. Here are links to my previous posts, #1000, #882, #879, and #869 in the original "Is Hell Really Eternal" thread. I'm not sure what your purpose was in mentioning them.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7789990-100/#post65872829

http://www.christianforums.com/t7789990-89/#post65838018

http://www.christianforums.com/t7789990-87/#post65833727

http://www.christianforums.com/t7789990-88/#post65837979
Your point is that the Jews believed x, Jesus never corrected x, therefore x is true.

But you don't believe x. You pick and choose the ancient beliefs of the Jews (even though Jesus never corrected those either). It's disingenuous.
 
Upvote 0

seeingeyes

Newbie
Nov 29, 2011
8,944
809
Backwoods, Ohio
✟35,360.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
very well, back to your question:

Mark 9:49 - I believe it to mean that just as a sacrifice is seasoned with salt so too those who enter hell will be seasoned with Fire. As it applies the context of Hell to it. Note I said those who enter Hell, so the "everyone" mentioned is all those who enter hell, so too, every sacrifice is only mentioning things sacrificed, not the things NOT sacrificed. Thats a lot of salt, if everything is salted.
No one who follows Christ gets away with not being a sacrifice.

there are three views in my seminary commentary, I believe the first and foremost literal view:

"the word “fire” link this verse to verses 43–48. Everyone may be explained in one of three ways: (1) It could refer to every unbeliever who enters hell. They will be salted with fire in the sense that as salt preserves food so they will be preserved throughout an eternity of fiery judgment.

From a seminary level commentary on Mark:
Grassmick, J. D. (1985). Mark. In J. F. Walvoord & R. B. Zuck (Eds.), The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures (Vol. 2, p. 147). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books."

(the other two views is that everyone is the disciples, and the third is that everyone is everyone- the commentary holds to the last view, but I will see if I can muster up some more views)
The third would be the "most literal" view.


here are some more that adhere to my view:

"the passage should be understood as the awesome announcement by Christ that all unbelievers will exist eternally in fire in the day of punishment."

Criswell, W. A., Patterson, P., Clendenen, E. R., Akin, D. L., Chamberlin, M., Patterson, D. K., & Pogue, J. (Eds.). (1991). Believer’s Study Bible (electronic ed., Mk 9:43). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.

wesley adheres to my view:

Verse 49. Every one...(that)* is cast into hell, shall be, as it were, salted with fire, preserved, not consumed thereby whereas every acceptable sacrifice shall be salted with another kind of salt, even that of Divine grace, which purifies the soul, (though frequently with pain) and preserves it from corruption.

Parenthesis mine*
Wesley, J. (1999). Mark (electronic ed., Mk 9:49). Albany, OR: Ages Software.

Arthur Pink in essay entitled - Eternal Punishment agrees-
"when we are told that "every one" who is cast into Gehenna shall be "salted with fire" we learn that the very fire itself so far from consuming shall preserve. If it be asked, How can this be? We answer, Because that fire is "prepared" by God (Mat 25:41).



Manual of Theology - Vol 1- J.L. Dagg states:

Some understand the words, "Every one shall be salted with fire,"[45] to import, that the fire of hell, instead of consuming its victims, will, like salt, preserve them. Whether this be its meaning, or not, there is no reason to doubt that the vessels of wrath fitted for destruction, will be adapted to the suffering which they will undergo. Instead of wasting away under its influence, or having their powers of endurance benumbed, we may rather conclude, that, as the righteous, will perpetually ascend in bliss, the wicked will perpetually sink in woe. Their deep is bottomless,[46] and being banished from the presence of God, they may continue to recede from him for ever. Their capacity for suffering, their tormenting passions, their hatred of God, and of one another, may all increase indefinitely, through eternal ages. As wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever, they will continue to fly further and further from God, the eternal source of light and happiness, into deeper, and still deeper darkness and woe. O, that men would seek the Lord, while he may be found.

some believe it both to be unbelievers in hell and believers in this life both salted:

Kenneth Wuest's GreeK word studies-

(9:49, 50) Verse 49, taken in its context, reaches back to the unquenchable fire of Gehenna (v. 48), and forward to the self-discipline of verse 50. Expositors says: "Every one must be salted somehow, either with the unquenchable fire of Gehenna or with the severe fire of self-discipline. Wise is he who chooses the latter alternative." Robertson reminds us of the fact that the Lord Jesus once called His disciples the salt of the earth (Matt. 5:13). He warns them now (v. 50) not to lose their saltness.

Mathew Henry States:

"The pain of mortifying the flesh now is no more to be compared with the punishment for not mortifying it, than salting with burning. And since he had said, that the fire of hell shall not be quenched, but it might be objected, that the fuel will not last always, he here intimates, that by the power of God it shall be made to last always; for those that are cast into hell, will find the fire to have not only the corroding quality of salt, but its preserving quality; whence it is used to signify that which is lasting: a covenant of salt is a perpetual covenant, and Lot’s wife being turned into a pillar of salt, made her a remaining monument of divine vengeance. Now since this will certainly be the doom of those that do not crucify the flesh with its affections and lusts, let us, knowing this terror of the Lord, be persuaded to do it."

Henry, M. (1994). Matthew Henry’s commentary on the whole Bible: complete and unabridged in one volume (p. 1799). Peabody: Hendrickson.

THE HEREAFTER: SHEOL, HADES, AND HELL, THE WORLD TO COME, THE SCRIPTURE DOCTRINE OF RETRIBUTION ACCORDING TO LAW. BY JAMES FYFE EDINBURGH :T. & T. CLARK, 38, GEORGE STREET.
1890. states:
Our Lord proceeds to concentrate and crystallize what He had previously said: " For every one must be salted with fire."J * The being salted with fire neither refers simply to the eternal fire, nor merely to the exhortation to self denial, but it includes both. The sense of the expression is this: Because of the general sinfulness of the race, every individual must be salted with fire; either, on the one hand, by his entering of his own free will on a course of self-denial and earnest purification from his iniquities; or, on the other hand, by his being carried against his will away to the place of punishment. The fire appears here first as the cleansing, purifying element, as it is often represented (Ma 1:3:2, 3),


but again I believe it to be ALL those in Hell will be salted, as that is what is spoken of in the context.

here again is one that agrees:

ENDLESS PUNISHMENT:

SCRIPTURAL ARGUMENT FOR, AND REASONABLENESS OF
FUTURE ENDLESS PUNISHMENT. BY NEHEMIAH ADAMS, D. D.,

Nehemiah Adams states:

FUTURE, ENDLESS PUNISHMENT. 49

hand and foot.” They “ cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion,” not with candidates for heaven, under discipline, but “with the hypocrites.” He is '' thrust out.” Christ uses the expressions, “ lose his soul; “ “be cast away; ““salted with fire;” “grind him to powder;” “son of perdition”; “ “slay them before me; ““ seek me and not find me; “ “ gather the good, and cast the bad away;” “great gulf fixed;”
“die in your sins;” “where I am ye cannot come.” In various parts of the Bible we meet with phrases of the like tenor, -- such as “ wrath to come; “ “ shame and everlasting contempt; ““ torment us before the time; “ “ reap corruption; “ “ wages of sin is death; “ “ more tolerable for Sodom in the day of judgment; “ “mist of darkness forever and ever.” Indeed, these incidental expressions, interwoven everywhere throughout the Bible, assume that the doctrine of future, endless punishment for sin is a matter of course. The common mode of referring to the future implies it. “ Because there is wrath, beware lest he take thee away with his stroke; ““then a great ransom will not deliver thee.” “I will laugh at your calamity, I will mock when
your fear cometh.” The numerous passages of this tenor do not suggest any idea of future clemency.

Paul thus declares the end of the wicked, “ The Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven, with his mighty angels, in flaming fire, taking vengeance on them that knew not God, and obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ; who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power, when he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and admired in all them that believe, for our testimony among you was believed in that day.” That this does not apply to the destruction of Jerusalem, as the Papists and some Protestants would have us think, appears from the next chapter, in which the Thessalonians are told that “ that day “ is not “ at hand,” because the “man of sin” was first to be revealed.

Then Peter follows him, and says, “ But the heavens and the earth which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.”

Thus, while the Bible satisfies us that the redemption made by Christ is a final effort to save men, we do not wonder that those who reject the Godhead of Christ and his sacrifice for sin, reject also the idea of endless punishment. There is no adequate necessity for a divine Saviour with his vicarious sacrifice, if there be no such penalty annexed to the law of God. Every man is then his own redeemer, either by obedience or by suffering.

But the evangelical believer looks into the. manger and upon the cross, and sees there his God incarnate. He sees, in that Christ, a sacrifice for his sins. The world laugh him to scorn.

They demand whether he believes that his God is dying; and every form of intellectual ridicule is poured upon him. He steadfastly maintains that “ the Word was God,” that “ the Word was made flesh,” that this incarnate Word was on the cross, “ a ransom for many,” “ a propitiation through faith in his blood,” his sufferings a substitute for the sinner's punishment. The believer looks to find some necessity for such an incarnation, and for the sacrificial death of such a being. He cannot find it in the need of example, moral suasion, or representation of the divine interest in him; but, in the declaration that Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many, he sees the appropriateness of the incarnation to give a divine worth and efficacy to sufferings which are to atone for sin. There is no revelation to be compared with this: “ God was manifest in the flesh,” and, he “was manifested to take away our sins.” By all the methods of imagery, symbolism, predictions, and most minute, pathetic delineations of his coming, his life, death, and resurrection; by appeals from his own lips, and those of men “ in Christ's stead; “by that perpetual memorial of him, and of his sacrifice, the Lord's supper, men are admonished, and, “ as though God did beseech them,'* urged to accept pardon through this infinite provision made for the forgiveness of sin. This produces the effect, generally, upon the mind, of a last effort.

It might have been supposed that the work of Christ would suffice for the present dispensation, and that men rejecting or neglecting it would, in a future state, be approached by those influences which belong peculiarly to the work of the third person in the Godhead. But Christ said, ''It is expedient for you that I go away; for, if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you. And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, of righteousness, and of judgment.” Something more than ordinary divine influence is meant here by the Comforter; for the Saviour's being in the world would not of course keep divine influence out of it, or prevent the disciples from receiving comfort in God. A special, divine agency is here recognized, and, by all the laws of language, a special, divine, personal agent.

His object is to reprove the world of sin, of righteousness, and of judgment. All which is implied in the idea of moral omnipotence is thus made to bear upon the hearts and minds of men, to effect their reconciliation to God, through Christ.

Resistance to these efforts in a certain way, it is declared, shall have the effect, however long a time before death it may be made, to consign the sinner to hopeless condemnation; for '^ whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.”

thank you for the question:

what is your view?

It's hard to know which of these you would like me to respond to. That last one makes the assumption that if one does not believe in an infinite number of years of punishment, one does not believe that Christ's sacrifice was necessary.

What if hell was not what you think it is? Would you still follow Christ?

At any rate, my view is that everyone will be salted with eternal fire, just as Christ himself was. "For whoever wants to save their life will lose it, but whoever loses their life for me will find it." (Matt 16)

This is not just a cosmic retirement plan, denying oneself now to save up for future happiness, this is entering into the world of God's grace where it rains on both the just and the unjust. Laying down one's own life for the people who are currently murdering you is not a strategy, it is eternal life shining out of a half-dead man.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟48,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
No one who follows Christ gets away with not being a sacrifice.
you have carnal Christians, or those who through their carnality use grace as an occasion for the flesh. Some believe they are not saved, I believe they are saved by the skin of the teeth, but nonetheless, saved.

some pastors and commentators that believe in carnal christians:

Jonathan Edwards-
"Indeed the Corinthians themselves who abounded in gifts tended to be carnal Christians."

Chuck Smith-
The Bible categorizes every man in one of three categories: natural, spiritual and carnal. Everyone falls into one of the three categories. The natural man is bad news. He walks in darkness and is alienated from God. The spiritual man has been made alive by the Spirit of God and is controlled by Him.
The carnal Christian, however, has enough of the Lord to be saved, but not enough of the Lord to rest in that salvation. He has enough of Christ to be miserable in the world, but too much of the world to be happy in Christ. That's a terrible place to be. - Chuck Smith- Answers for Today.

Chuck Smith in C2000 through the Bible series-

but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ ( 1Co 3:1 ).

Now the issue arises, and people often question, is it possible to be a carnal Christian? A carnal Christian is one who has received Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior, but does not yet have victory over the flesh and thus, still walks, many times, under the control of the flesh. He does believe, he has received Jesus as his Savior, but not as his Lord, for the flesh is still ruling over him. And he needs deliverance from that power of the flesh that has a hold on his life. So Paul describes this as the conditions of those in Corinth.

He cannot talk to them as spiritual, for they are still carnal, but he does call them babes in Christ. And so he acknowledges that they are in Christ, but unfortunately, they are babes. There is a natural development and growth physically even as there is and should be a natural development and growth spiritually. There is a time when being a babe in Christ is a beautiful, glorious thing. I love to see natural babes in Christ.
Lewis Sperry Chafer on Carnal Christians-
"This truth alone accounts for the existing difference between the spiritual Christian who “discerns all things” and the carnal Christian who cannot receive the deeper and more vital truths which are likened to strong meat (1Co 2:15; 1Co 3:1-3)."

The third would be the "most literal" view.
it breaks systematic theology of hell #1, secondly, it breaks the context to shoot out some random comment about following the Lord, and thirdly- if everything sacrificed referred to everyone, then it would be everyone universally (saved and not saved that it was referring to), since that doesn't make sense, we must use the golden rule to to modify the "everyone" to only being "some" why not modify it to match the context of the passage?




It's hard to know which of these you would like me to respond to. That last one makes the assumption that if one does not believe in an infinite number of years of punishment, one does not believe that Christ's sacrifice was necessary.

Jonathan wesley adheres to my view:

Verse 49. Every one...(that)* is cast into hell, shall be, as it were, salted with fire, preserved, not consumed thereby whereas every acceptable sacrifice shall be salted with another kind of salt, even that of Divine grace, which purifies the soul, (though frequently with pain) and preserves it from corruption.

Parenthesis mine*
Wesley, J. (1999). Mark (electronic ed., Mk 9:49). Albany, OR: Ages Software.

try countering the famous wesley.

What if hell was not what you think it is? Would you still follow Christ?

I probably would never have been a christian, because annihilation seems to weak a thing for an eternal God to deliver to wicked men.


At any rate, my view is that everyone will be salted with eternal fire, just as Christ himself was. "For whoever wants to save their life will lose it, but whoever loses their life for me will find it." (Matt 16)
This is not just a cosmic retirement plan, denying oneself now to save up for future happiness, this is entering into the world of God's grace where it rains on both the just and the unjust. Laying down one's own life for the people who are currently murdering you is not a strategy, it is eternal life shining out of a half-dead man.

thats fine, but you have only one (really sketchy) verse that supports your view of being salted with fire and it not referring to eternal hell.

What do you do with all the pictures of hell as presented by

ENDLESS PUNISHMENT:

SCRIPTURAL ARGUMENT FOR, AND REASONABLENESS OF
FUTURE ENDLESS PUNISHMENT. BY NEHEMIAH ADAMS, D. D.,

Nehemiah Adams states:

FUTURE, ENDLESS PUNISHMENT. 49

hand and foot.” They “ cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion,” not with candidates for heaven, under discipline, but “with the hypocrites.” He is '' thrust out.” Christ uses the expressions, “ lose his soul; “ “be cast away; ““salted with fire;” “grind him to powder;” “son of perdition”; “ “slay them before me; ““ seek me and not find me; “ “ gather the good, and cast the bad away;” “great gulf fixed;”
“die in your sins;” “where I am ye cannot come.” In various parts of the Bible we meet with phrases of the like tenor, -- such as “ wrath to come; “ “ shame and everlasting contempt; ““ torment us before the time; “ “ reap corruption; “ “ wages of sin is death; “ “ more tolerable for Sodom in the day of judgment; “ “mist of darkness forever and ever.” Indeed, these incidental expressions, interwoven everywhere throughout the Bible, assume that the doctrine of future, endless punishment for sin is a matter of course. The common mode of referring to the future implies it. “ Because there is wrath, beware lest he take thee away with his stroke; ““then a great ransom will not deliver thee.” “I will laugh at your calamity, I will mock when
your fear cometh.” The numerous passages of this tenor do not suggest any idea of future clemency.

Paul thus declares the end of the wicked, “ The Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven, with his mighty angels, in flaming fire, taking vengeance on them that knew not God, and obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ; who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power, when he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and admired in all them that believe, for our testimony among you was believed in that day.” That this does not apply to the destruction of Jerusalem, as the Papists and some Protestants would have us think, appears from the next chapter, in which the Thessalonians are told that “ that day “ is not “ at hand,” because the “man of sin” was first to be revealed.

Then Peter follows him, and says, “ But the heavens and the earth which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.”

Thus, while the Bible satisfies us that the redemption made by Christ is a final effort to save men, we do not wonder that those who reject the Godhead of Christ and his sacrifice for sin, reject also the idea of endless punishment. There is no adequate necessity for a divine Saviour with his vicarious sacrifice, if there be no such penalty annexed to the law of God. Every man is then his own redeemer, either by obedience or by suffering.

But the evangelical believer looks into the. manger and upon the cross, and sees there his God incarnate. He sees, in that Christ, a sacrifice for his sins. The world laugh him to scorn.

They demand whether he believes that his God is dying; and every form of intellectual ridicule is poured upon him. He steadfastly maintains that “ the Word was God,” that “ the Word was made flesh,” that this incarnate Word was on the cross, “ a ransom for many,” “ a propitiation through faith in his blood,” his sufferings a substitute for the sinner's punishment. The believer looks to find some necessity for such an incarnation, and for the sacrificial death of such a being. He cannot find it in the need of example, moral suasion, or representation of the divine interest in him; but, in the declaration that Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many, he sees the appropriateness of the incarnation to give a divine worth and efficacy to sufferings which are to atone for sin. There is no revelation to be compared with this: “ God was manifest in the flesh,” and, he “was manifested to take away our sins.” By all the methods of imagery, symbolism, predictions, and most minute, pathetic delineations of his coming, his life, death, and resurrection; by appeals from his own lips, and those of men “ in Christ's stead; “by that perpetual memorial of him, and of his sacrifice, the Lord's supper, men are admonished, and, “ as though God did beseech them,'* urged to accept pardon through this infinite provision made for the forgiveness of sin. This produces the effect, generally, upon the mind, of a last effort.

It might have been supposed that the work of Christ would suffice for the present dispensation, and that men rejecting or neglecting it would, in a future state, be approached by those influences which belong peculiarly to the work of the third person in the Godhead. But Christ said, ''It is expedient for you that I go away; for, if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you. And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, of righteousness, and of judgment.” Something more than ordinary divine influence is meant here by the Comforter; for the Saviour's being in the world would not of course keep divine influence out of it, or prevent the disciples from receiving comfort in God. A special, divine agency is here recognized, and, by all the laws of language, a special, divine, personal agent.

His object is to reprove the world of sin, of righteousness, and of judgment. All which is implied in the idea of moral omnipotence is thus made to bear upon the hearts and minds of men, to effect their reconciliation to God, through Christ.

Resistance to these efforts in a certain way, it is declared, shall have the effect, however long a time before death it may be made, to consign the sinner to hopeless condemnation; for '^ whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.”
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟48,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
anyone who doesn't believe in eternal Hell is forced to say that Jesus ceased to exist for three days, then reinvented a new soul and a new body at the resurrection. He could not have the same one because it ceased to exist. Therefore you must too accept Christ was a different person, and not the same Christ that suffered the first time. Hence the crucifixion would be useless and the Resurrection a hoax.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟98,248.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
you have carnal Christians, or those who through their carnality use grace as an occasion for the flesh. Some believe they are not saved, I believe they are saved by the skin of the teeth, but nonetheless, saved. some pastors and commentators that believe in carnal christians:
ENDLESS PUNISHMENT:SCRIPTURAL ARGUMENT FOR, AND REASONABLENESS OF FUTURE ENDLESS PUNISHMENT. BY NEHEMIAH ADAMS, D. D., .”
Very sad..... Matthew 24:24 For false christs and false prophets will rise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect.

SATAN (σατανας, 4567), a Greek form derived from the Aramaic (Heb.ha-satan,), “an adversary,” is used (a) of an angel of Jehovah in Num. 22:22 (the first occurrence of the Word in the OT); (b) of men, e.g., 1 Sam. 29:4; Ps. 38:20; 71:13; four in Ps. 109; (c) of “Satan,” the Devil, some seventeen or eighteen times in the OT; in Zech. 3:1, where the name receives its interpretation, “to be (his) adversary,”

SLANDERER diabolos (διαβολος, 1228), an adjective, “slanderous, accusing falsely,” is used as a noun, translated “slanderers” in 1 Tim. 3:11, where the reference is to those who are given to finding fault with the demeanor and conduct of others and spreading their innuendos and criticisms in the church; in 2 Tim. 3:3, RV (KJV, “false accusers”); Titus 2:3
VINE’S COMPLETE EXPOSITORY DICTIONARY

Ps 35:5 Let them be as chaff before the wind: and let the angel of the LORD chase themIsa 47:14 Behold, they shall be as stubble; the fire [of GOD] shall burn them; they shall not deliver themselves from the power of the flame: there shall not be a coal to warm at, nor fire to sit before it...because they have cast away the law of the LORD of hosts, and despised the word of the Holy One of Israel. 5:24

2Th 1:7 And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels,
8 In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ:
9 Who shall pay a penalty of everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power;
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟48,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Very sad..... Matthew 24:24 For false christs and false prophets will rise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect.

your post begs the question as to who and how one is in fact is deceived. Thanks for the post.
 
Upvote 0

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
65
Left coast
✟100,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
your post begs the question as to who and how one is in fact is deceived. Thanks for the post.
I would guess people listening to preaching like that are being deceived.
 
Upvote 0

seeingeyes

Newbie
Nov 29, 2011
8,944
809
Backwoods, Ohio
✟35,360.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
you have carnal Christians, or those who through their carnality use grace as an occasion for the flesh. Some believe they are not saved, I believe they are saved by the skin of the teeth, but nonetheless, saved.
I don't know what this has to do with everyone being a sacrifice.


it breaks systematic theology of hell #1,
Perhaps the systematic theology of hell is wrong. :shrug:
secondly, it breaks the context to shoot out some random comment about following the Lord,
I don't understand. Jesus wasn't speaking in context?
and thirdly- if everything sacrificed referred to everyone, then it would be everyone universally (saved and not saved that it was referring to), since that doesn't make sense, we must use the golden rule to to modify the "everyone" to only being "some" why not modify it to match the context of the passage?

Why doesn't that make sense?

Jonathan wesley adheres to my view:

Verse 49. Every one...(that)* is cast into hell, shall be, as it were, salted with fire, preserved, not consumed thereby whereas every acceptable sacrifice shall be salted with another kind of salt, even that of Divine grace, which purifies the soul, (though frequently with pain) and preserves it from corruption.

Parenthesis mine*
Wesley, J. (1999). Mark (electronic ed., Mk 9:49). Albany, OR: Ages Software.

try countering the famous wesley.
Ok: Where'd the second kind of salt come from, Mr. Wesley? Jesus only spoke of one.


I probably would never have been a christian, because annihilation seems to weak a thing for an eternal God to deliver to wicked men.

Grace must really irritate you, then.

thats fine, but you have only one (really sketchy) verse that supports your view of being salted with fire and it not referring to eternal hell.

What do you do with all the pictures of hell as presented by

ENDLESS PUNISHMENT:

SCRIPTURAL ARGUMENT FOR, AND REASONABLENESS OF
FUTURE ENDLESS PUNISHMENT. BY NEHEMIAH ADAMS, D. D.,

Nehemiah Adams states:

FUTURE, ENDLESS PUNISHMENT. 49

hand and foot.” They “ cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion,” not with candidates for heaven, under discipline, but “with the hypocrites.” He is '' thrust out.” Christ uses the expressions, “ lose his soul; “ “be cast away; ““salted with fire;” “grind him to powder;” “son of perdition”; “ “slay them before me; ““ seek me and not find me; “ “ gather the good, and cast the bad away;” “great gulf fixed;”
“die in your sins;” “where I am ye cannot come.” In various parts of the Bible we meet with phrases of the like tenor, -- such as “ wrath to come; “ “ shame and everlasting contempt; ““ torment us before the time; “ “ reap corruption; “ “ wages of sin is death; “ “ more tolerable for Sodom in the day of judgment; “ “mist of darkness forever and ever.” Indeed, these incidental expressions, interwoven everywhere throughout the Bible, assume that the doctrine of future, endless punishment for sin is a matter of course. The common mode of referring to the future implies it. “ Because there is wrath, beware lest he take thee away with his stroke; ““then a great ransom will not deliver thee.” “I will laugh at your calamity, I will mock when
your fear cometh.” The numerous passages of this tenor do not suggest any idea of future clemency.

Paul thus declares the end of the wicked, “ The Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven, with his mighty angels, in flaming fire, taking vengeance on them that knew not God, and obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ; who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power, when he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and admired in all them that believe, for our testimony among you was believed in that day.” That this does not apply to the destruction of Jerusalem, as the Papists and some Protestants would have us think, appears from the next chapter, in which the Thessalonians are told that “ that day “ is not “ at hand,” because the “man of sin” was first to be revealed.

Then Peter follows him, and says, “ But the heavens and the earth which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.”

Thus, while the Bible satisfies us that the redemption made by Christ is a final effort to save men, we do not wonder that those who reject the Godhead of Christ and his sacrifice for sin, reject also the idea of endless punishment. There is no adequate necessity for a divine Saviour with his vicarious sacrifice, if there be no such penalty annexed to the law of God. Every man is then his own redeemer, either by obedience or by suffering.

But the evangelical believer looks into the. manger and upon the cross, and sees there his God incarnate. He sees, in that Christ, a sacrifice for his sins. The world laugh him to scorn.

They demand whether he believes that his God is dying; and every form of intellectual ridicule is poured upon him. He steadfastly maintains that “ the Word was God,” that “ the Word was made flesh,” that this incarnate Word was on the cross, “ a ransom for many,” “ a propitiation through faith in his blood,” his sufferings a substitute for the sinner's punishment. The believer looks to find some necessity for such an incarnation, and for the sacrificial death of such a being. He cannot find it in the need of example, moral suasion, or representation of the divine interest in him; but, in the declaration that Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many, he sees the appropriateness of the incarnation to give a divine worth and efficacy to sufferings which are to atone for sin. There is no revelation to be compared with this: “ God was manifest in the flesh,” and, he “was manifested to take away our sins.” By all the methods of imagery, symbolism, predictions, and most minute, pathetic delineations of his coming, his life, death, and resurrection; by appeals from his own lips, and those of men “ in Christ's stead; “by that perpetual memorial of him, and of his sacrifice, the Lord's supper, men are admonished, and, “ as though God did beseech them,'* urged to accept pardon through this infinite provision made for the forgiveness of sin. This produces the effect, generally, upon the mind, of a last effort.

It might have been supposed that the work of Christ would suffice for the present dispensation, and that men rejecting or neglecting it would, in a future state, be approached by those influences which belong peculiarly to the work of the third person in the Godhead. But Christ said, ''It is expedient for you that I go away; for, if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you. And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, of righteousness, and of judgment.” Something more than ordinary divine influence is meant here by the Comforter; for the Saviour's being in the world would not of course keep divine influence out of it, or prevent the disciples from receiving comfort in God. A special, divine agency is here recognized, and, by all the laws of language, a special, divine, personal agent.

His object is to reprove the world of sin, of righteousness, and of judgment. All which is implied in the idea of moral omnipotence is thus made to bear upon the hearts and minds of men, to effect their reconciliation to God, through Christ.

Resistance to these efforts in a certain way, it is declared, shall have the effect, however long a time before death it may be made, to consign the sinner to hopeless condemnation; for '^ whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.”

It's rather cute to say "in a certain way", because that means that the way I have rejected the spirit of the living God is more forgivable than the way that you have rejected the spirit of the living God. Just a few loopholes to keep the people who agree with me in the right, and pour the wrath of God onto those who disagree.

That last paragraph damns everyone.

Everyone will be salted with fire.
 
Upvote 0

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
65
Left coast
✟100,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Lost a child some time ago. Is it better for me to see God as allowing that suffering for His Glory (though I cannot see it) or to imagine Him a torturer for allowing it to occur?
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Your point is that the Jews believed x, Jesus never corrected x, therefore x is true.

But you don't believe x. You pick and choose the ancient beliefs of the Jews (even though Jesus never corrected those either). It's disingenuous.

I think I already addressed this before. There are a great many things Jesus did not address, and we can't just arbitrarily choose something and say because Jesus did not address it that He (dis)approved it. But it appears you are deliberately twisting my words trying to make it appear that I am being disingenuous. You left out much of what I said.

The Jews did believe X[sup]1[/sup], I presented evidence for that belief, Jesus taught about X[sup]1[/sup], I cited scripture, what Jesus taught directly related to and supported Jewish belief in X[sup]1[/sup], it did not contradict or correct Jewish belief X[sup]1[/sup].

However Jesus never taught specifically about X[sup]2[/sup], Jesus never taught that only gentiles went to hell, Jesus never taught that sinners went to hell but came up after 12 months, Jesus never taught that all that descend into Gehenna shall come up again, with the exception of three classes of men: those who have committed adultery, or shamed their neighbors, or vilified them, Jesus never taught The fire of Gehenna does not touch the Jewish sinners because they confess their sins before the gates of hell and return to God, etc. What Jesus did teach contradicted and corrected these and other such beliefs.

Based on historical evidence, below, the Hell:No! view being presented in this forum and the above post, is not Biblical. The Jews, in Israel before and during the time of Jesus believed in a place of unending, fiery torment and they called it both Gehinnom/Gehenna and Sheol. When Jesus taught about "Eternal punishment,""the fire of hell where the fire is not quenched and the worm does not die," and "cast into a fiery furnace where there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth," that supported and validated the existing view of eternal hell. Jesus was born into and grew to maturity in that culture. He knew what His countrymen, the Jews, believed about hell. If the Jews were wrong Jesus would have corrected them. He did not, thus their teaching on hell was correct. Here is historical evidence to support this.

•"Eternal punishment, Mt 25:46"
•"the fire of hell where the fire is not quenched and the worm does not die, Mk 9:43-48" and
•"cast into a fiery furnace where there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth,” Mt 13:42, 50
• “better for [a person who offends a little one] that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea. Mt 18:6
• “it had been good for [the one who betrays Jesus] if he had not been born.” Mat 26:24, Mar 14:21

These teachings supported and sanctioned the existing Jewish view of eternal hell. Jesus was born in and grew to maturity in 1st century Israel. He knew what the Jews, believed about hell. If the Jews were wrong Jesus would have corrected them. He did not correct them, thus their teaching on hell was correct.

Jewish Encyclopedia, Gehenna

The place where children were sacrificed to the god Moloch was originally in the "valley of the son of Hinnom," to the south of Jerusalem (Josh. xv. 8, passim; II Kings xxiii. 10; Jer. ii. 23; vii. 31-32; xix. 6, 13-14). For this reason the valley was deemed to be accursed, and "Gehenna" therefore soon became a figurative equivalent for "hell." Hell, like paradise, was created by God (Sotah 22a); [Note, this is according to the ancient Jews, long before the Christian era, NOT the bias of Christian translators.]

It is assumed in general that sinners go to hell immediately after their death. The famous teacher Johanan b. Zakkai wept before his death because he did not know whether he would go to paradise or to hell (Ber. 28b). The pious go to paradise, and sinners to hell (B.M. 83b).

But as regards the heretics, etc., and Jeroboam, Nebat's son, hell shall pass away, but they shall not pass away" (R. H. 17a; comp. Shab. 33b). All that descend into Gehenna shall come up again, with the exception of three classes of men: those who have committed adultery, or shamed their neighbors, or vilified them (B. M. 58b).[/i]

As mentioned above, heretics and the Roman oppressors go to Gehenna, and the same fate awaits the Persians, the oppressors of the Babylonian Jews (Ber. 8b). When Nebuchadnezzar descended into hell, [Sheol] all its inhabitants were afraid that he was coming to rule over them (Shab. 149a; comp. Isa. xiv. 9-10). The Book of Enoch also says that it is chiefly the heathen who are to be cast into the fiery pool on the Day of Judgment (x. 6, xci. 9, et al). "The Lord, the Almighty, will punish them on the Day of Judgment by putting fire and worms into their flesh, so that they cry out with pain unto all eternity" (Judith xvi. 17). The sinners in Gehenna will be filled with pain when God puts back the souls into the dead bodies on the Day of Judgment, according to Isa. xxxiii. 11 (Sanh. 108b).


Jewish Encyclopedia Online
====================================================================
Talmud -Tractate Rosh Hashanah Chapter 1.

The school of Hillel says: . . . but as for Minim, [follower of Jesus] informers and disbelievers, who deny the Torah, or Resurrection, or separate themselves from the congregation, or who inspire their fellowmen with dread of them, or who sin and cause others to sin, as did Jeroboam the son of Nebat and his followers, they all descend to Gehenna, and are judged there from generation to generation, as it is said [Isa. lxvi. 24]: "And they shall go forth and look upon the carcases of the men who have transgressed against Me; for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched." Even when Gehenna will be destroyed, they will not be consumed, as it is written [Psalms, xlix. 15]: "And their forms wasteth away in the nether world," which the sages comment upon to mean that their forms shall endure even when the grave is no more. Concerning them Hannah says [I Sam. ii. 10]: "The adversaries of the Lord shall be broken to pieces."

Tract Rosh Hashana: Chapter I.
 
Upvote 0

seeingeyes

Newbie
Nov 29, 2011
8,944
809
Backwoods, Ohio
✟35,360.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Lost a child some time ago. Is it better for me to see God as allowing that suffering for His Glory (though I cannot see it) or to imagine Him a torturer for allowing it to occur?

It is better for you to know that He stands in hell with you.

May God bless you and keep you, brother.
 
Upvote 0

seeingeyes

Newbie
Nov 29, 2011
8,944
809
Backwoods, Ohio
✟35,360.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I think I already addressed this before. There are a great many things Jesus did not address, and we can't just arbitrarily choose something and say because Jesus did not address it that He (dis)approved it.
So stop doing that...
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟48,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I don't know what this has to do with everyone being a sacrifice.

when you said sacrifice you quoted a verse speaking of "carrying crosses" didn't you? I replied to carrying crosses and being a living sacrifice that "not all will live this well, some will be carnal christians"
I don't understand. Jesus wasn't speaking in context?

Greg Koukl has a theory, it's called "never read a Bible verse"

and his theory is to read every thing in context, read 15 verses before and 15 verses after to gain the setting in which the verse was laid.

Why doesn't that make sense?
I don't know what you are asking here?

Ok: Where'd the second kind of salt come from, Mr. Wesley? Jesus only spoke of one.

Jesus mentioned two saltings, one after the other. Wesley believed one had more grace than the other. Namely the salting of sacrifice.


Grace must really irritate you, then.
To view God as weaker than say my mother or father, as more liberal, as more permitting is to wreak havoc on ones view of God. God being infinitely more aware of the minute and minor sins of thought-life will provide an infinitely more devastating judgement.

J.Warner Wallace author of Cold Case Christianity (book)

states this regarding some misconceptions:

Duration of the Punishment is Not Based on Duration of the Crime
The torment experienced in Hell is eternal, and for some, this still seems inequitable compared to the finite and limited sins that we might commit here on earth. So let’s address the issue of the duration of the punishment. First, it’s important for us to remember the severity of a crime does not always have anything to do with the amount of time it takes to commit it. If I embezzle five dollars a day from my boss over the course of five years, I might eventually get caught and pay the penalty for embezzling $32,500.00. In the State of California, this violates California Penal Code 503PC and the punishment might be anything from probation to a 5 year state prison sentence. But if I become enraged at a coworker and in the blink of an eye I lose my temper and kill him, the crime is now murder (187PC). This crime took much less than five years to commit. It only took five seconds. Yet the penalty for this crime is far greater. I will be serving at least 25 years to life, and I may even be put to death. The penalties for these two crimes are very different, and they have nothing to do with the duration of the actual criminal act. Instead, the severity of the crime is the key to determining its punishment. It’s the same way with God. The duration of the crime has little to do with the duration of the penalty. It’s all about the severity of the crime. “But are you trying to tell me that my disbelief alone is severe enough for me to deserve an eternal hell?” That question will be addressed in the next section. For now, it’s enough to simply point out that the duration of the crime is not what determines the punishment of the crime.

Punishment is Based on the Source of the Law
In addition to this, it’s important to remember the punishment for any crime is not determined by the criminal, but by the authority who is responsible for upholding the standard. Justice is not determined by the law breaker, but by the law giver. Justice and punishment are established based on the nature of the source of the law, not the nature of the source of the offense. Since God is the source of justice and the law, His nature determines the punishment. Since God is eternal and conscious, all rewards and punishments must also be eternal and conscious.

The Crime is Worse Than You Think
Finally, it’s important to remember the nature of the crime eventually leading one into Hell. It is not the fact you kicked your dog in 1992. It’s not the fact you had evil thoughts about your teacher in 1983. The crime earning us a place in Hell is our rejection of the true and living eternal God. This rejection is not finite. People who reject God have rejected Him completely. They have rejected Him to their death, to the very end. They have rejected Him as an ultimate and final decision. God then has the right and obligation to judge them with an ultimate punishment. To argue God’s punishment does not fit our crime is to underestimate our crime.

There are several good reasons to expect an eternal punishment even though our earthly crimes may seem finite. Our approach to this objection may require us to give a robust and cumulative response:

Objection:
Why Would A Loving God Punish Finite Sin With Infinite Torture?

Response:
A Loving God simply allows us to suffer the anguish and torment resulting as a consequence of our bad choices. There is a difference between self-inflicted torment and active torture at the hands of another. The duration of the crime has nothing to do with the duration of the punishment (even in this life). The source of the law determines the degree of the punishment, and God is a perfect eternal, conscious being. Don’t be surprised to find we often underestimate the eternal consequence of our own sinful and ultimate choice to reject God.


It's rather cute to say "in a certain way", because that means that the way I have rejected the spirit of the living God is more forgivable than the way that you have rejected the spirit of the living God. Just a few loopholes to keep the people who agree with me in the right, and pour the wrath of God onto those who disagree.

That last paragraph damns everyone.

Everyone will be salted with fire.

I included some more of his commentary for context:

Resistance to these efforts in a certain way, it is declared, shall have the effect, however long a time before death it may be made, to consign the sinner to hopeless condemnation; for '^ whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.” It does not seem easy to explain how any one who ''hath never forgiveness,” “ neither in this world, neither in the world to come,” is to be saved; nor by what moral distinctions it can be made to appear that some who commit one particular sin are justly condemned to a hopeless, unforgiven state, and that all the rest of mankind are to be restored. The work of the Holy Spirit, and the unpardonable sin against him, convince us that the effort of mercy to save men ends with life. Such words as these from Christ, “hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation,” admit of no appeal.

In this connection let it be observed that evangelical Christians regard the work of the Holy Spirit as of equal importance with the death of Christ, and as essential a part of the work of redemption. It is from sin that we are to be redeemed; it is to holiness that we are to be restored; hell and heaven are a consummation, respectively, of sin and holiness. But we notice that those who reject 'the idea of future punishment dwell much on sin and holiness as being the sole objects of redemption, irrespective of the future state to which they lead. Olshaiisen says: '' The Scriptures know no such pretended divestment of all egoism, that man needs as motives neither fear nor hope, whether of damnation or eternal happiness; -- and rightly; for it (z. e, this notion) exhibits itself either as fanatical error, as in Madame Guyon, or, which is doubtless most common, as indifference and torpidity.”^ However some may regard it as a narrow and selfish thing to make so much, as evangelical Christians do, of “ salvation “ and “ safety,” we find that the New Testament sets us the example. Its chief burden is holiness, likeness to God; but it appeals to our love of happiness and dread of pain; sentimental philosophy would substitute for these instincts a perception of the “ good, the beautiful, and the true;” the gospel insists on these, but the way to reach them is through the natural constitution which God has given us.

Inspiration does not disdain to say, “ God so loved the world that he gave his only-begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life.” “He that believeth shall be saved, and he that believeth not shall be damned.” '' We shall be saved from wrath through him.” '^ Who have fled for refuge to lay hold on the hope set before us.”

“ What shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul; or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? “The attempt to show that all this is unworthy of our “noble aspirations,” is only professing to be wise; but “ the foolishness of God is wiser than men.” The work of the Holy Spirit in applying the redemption by Christ to the souls of men has for its object not only to save them from sin, but from its “ wages,” which is “death.”


All having failed, and men going from under the concentrated influences of redeeming mercy into a future state, if then the God who has provided such a plan of redemption, is to meet them, and, rather than have them perish^ abandon all his terms, and admit them to heaven upon their own conditions, rather than see them suffer; if he who became flesh and died for them, will then consent that punishment shall try to effect that which love and earthly discipline, together, failed to accomplish, and punishment proves to be the power of God and the wisdom of God unto salvation, and sinners will therefore have more powerful means of grace in hell than under the gospel, we, for our part, need another revelation to inform us of it, and then to explain its consistency with our present Bible.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟48,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
anyone who doesn't believe in eternal Hell is forced to say that Jesus ceased to exist for three days, then reinvented a new soul and a new body at the resurrection. He could not have the same one because it ceased to exist. Therefore you must too accept Christ was a different person, and not the same Christ that suffered the first time. Hence the crucifixion would be useless and the Resurrection a hoax.

I think you guys missed this post.
 
Upvote 0