repentandbelieve said:
You have a lot of very legitmate questions. Way too many to address in a single post.
Like many, you are destitute of the truth concerning God. You've been disceived. Your beliefs concerning God are based on misconceptions. What you lack is a knowledge of the truth.
Just as God is LOVE, Jesus is the TRUTH. The Truth about God is so essential, there is no other way way to the Father without it.
I hear your doubts, and I'm trying to answer them. But please, one question at a time. The truth is built precept upon precept.
Your right the teachings of Jesus have been "terribly distorted". Apparently you have enough knowledge of the original teachings of Jesus to discern that. Did Jesus teach that God the Father is unmerciful? The anwer is no, quite the opposite.
Now, here is my question to you. How is that you are critical of other who distort the teachings of Jesus when you are also quilty of distorting His teachings. Jesus taught that God is merciful, you teach that God is unmerciful. yet you are critical of those who distort Jesus' teaching. I don't understand?????????
I never said God is not merciful. I'm saying that according to our teachings God appears to be a monster. We scare away lots of people who think that our teachings are unfair and that they don't make much sense, too fanatical and sectarian.
I don't know what are the original teachings of Jesus. The only Jesus I know if the One from the Bible. But the scripture has been altered so many times to fit the needs of the emperors throughout the past. Lusty, power hungry rulers who didn't accept Jesus and his teachings untill Peter (or was it Paul) agreed to compromise and to mix with them to appeal to their behavior (meat eating, wine drinking and all) and to get them to accept Jesus. Untill then, Christ's followers were killed, tortured and cast away. Romans were simply too sinful to accept the original teaching so they needed to be modified. They were allowed the same diet and the idea of one life was introduced, in that way, they could control the people by the method of fear: You have only one life and unless you submit you'll burn forever."
One should carefuly study all the councils throughout the history and find out what was anathemed, excluded, introduced etc.
That is why it is so hard for us to answer daring questions such as; what happens if you're born in Africa, never heard about Jesus, they teach you to eat humas all your life and to worship some totems and idols, and then you die, where do you go?
Whay happens to the newborn baby of, say, the muslim family, who dies after a day or a week of her/his life; where does the sould of that baby goes?
In the same way we can question the mercy of God by asking, why would he throw me in hell forever for a short 30, 40, or 50 years of sinful life

without giving me another chance to get right, just like any loving parent would do.
But if you impose that there's only one life, you are making our God very unfair.
Take a look at the Bible when Jesus walks by a man who was blind from his birth. Jesus's disciples asked Him: "Rabi, is reason for his blindness the sins of his parents or his own sins?"
Now, the first part of the question I can understand, if his parents were sinful, maybe their punishment was to get a blind child (although it is not fair towards the child, but let's forget about that for now), but what does that mean, "or is it due to his sins?" When did he get a chance to commint any sins if he didn't existed before this life?
Obvoiusly, they knew about the idea of past life, and Jesus didn't even corrected them like,
what are you talking about, how can he sin before he was born, or something like that.
Seems like there's much more to the Jesus teachings than we know of today.
And it seems that might be the reason for so many holes in out philosophy.
Any comments,
Thanks
Kristijan