• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is being Wiccan moral?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Havoc

Celtic Witch
Jul 26, 2002
4,652
91
63
Realityville
Visit site
✟29,135.00
Faith
Pagan
Whitehorse said:
This is a very interesting question, about the morality of wicca. There are a couple of questions I would need to ask in order to make a determination:

First we would need to ask God what His will is.

Of course, a wiccan would say s/he does not believe in Jehovah.
And we have just as much chance of being right about that as you.


But what is the motive for choosing wicca? This sort of religion is chosen, whereas Christianity is not chosen, but imparted.
Christianity is not chosen? Well there goes half the apologetics arguements of Christians. So you are forced into Christianity then?

Seriously. You believe Christianity is imparted and so you chose it. Every religion believes the truths of that religion are imparted, and every religion is a chosen religion. This includes both mine and yours. You cannot show that your religion is imparted by anything more than a book.

Well some of the people are offensive, especially when thay keep basing arguements on a "truth" they cannot show exists. I've already dealt with the "imparted, not chosen" fallacy.


Can we really have the right to choose our own gods? If so, then we are in authority over those gods, which, if any had been the real God, we would have no authority, as evidenced by our temporality. So this does not make sense.
If we cannot show that our Gods are the absolute truth then we have chosen them. You have chosen yours, I have chosen mine. If you ever come up with anything other than speculation to show the existence of your God you might have a leg to stand on.

Moreover, if the religion is new, that means someone invented it and it cannot be the proper authority on things eternal.
Christianity was new at one time about 2000 years ago. By your arguement it was invalid at that time.

And it all boils down to Who we consult as to morality. As created beings, we are created obviously for the purpose of Another, not for our own. That is why we were created, because again, we have no say in our existence.
Fine.. now show conclusively that it was your God's purpose and not the purpose of the myriad of other Gods and Goddesses who have just as verifiable a claim to us.


So to whom do we go for authority? God.

Once we go to this authority, we know whether or not a religion is moral by whether or not it is true, and acceptable to God.
Correction: You believe you go to God for this authority. You judge the morality of other religions by their conformity to your beliefs. Whether any religion is true or not is not a proveable proposition, at least not yet, and for you to use your unproven and unverifiable religion as a yardstick for proof is ingenuine at best. What is acceptable to God depends on which God exists, if any.


just a thought.
Yes just a thought and not the fact it's purported to be.
 
Upvote 0

Havoc

Celtic Witch
Jul 26, 2002
4,652
91
63
Realityville
Visit site
✟29,135.00
Faith
Pagan
Whitehorse said:
Sure, I see what you're saying about conviction. Definitely an important element. But I would have to ask, supposing it is not true. Can morality, regardless of intention, be couched in what is not true?
Since all religions have morality, and according to you only one is true, then the answer would be emphatically yes. By your own arguements, morality can be couched in what is not true.

Wouldn't this offend the God of truth, even if the intent was good?
It might, if He or She or They care about that sort of thing, or what you think about it. You want the "God of Truth" to be your concept of the Divine. Whether that's what the Divine actually is is not something you've managed to show so any speculation you have on what offends the Divine is no more authoritative than anyone else's.

Again with the backhanded, thinly veiled insults. Be careful as any comments you apply to a religion that is "new" now would apply to your religion back when it was "new".

If mine is invalid just because it's new then yours was invalid when it was new, and your people have been following that invalid religion for 2000 years. Now which of us us more decieved?
 
Upvote 0

tcampen

Veteran
Jul 14, 2003
2,704
151
✟26,132.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
You better be carefule. Such reasonableness is not taken lightly in these parts. HEAD FOR THE HILLS!
 
Upvote 0

Jacob4Jesus

Dork For Jesus and Proud of It
Sep 18, 2003
2,826
170
50
Wauconda, IL
✟3,922.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
In my time as a pagan, I have seen many moral and immoral Wiccans.

In my time as a christian, I have seen many moral and immoral Christians.

Morality very rarely is as objective as it should be. I mostly see other people judging people by their own ideas of morality. But truthfully, some of the Wiccans I have known have been some of the most moral and wonderful people I have ever met.
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist

Actually, it's when you don't have the truth that you're not sure what the truth is. Those who have it, know it. While I agree that we are limited creatures, God is not limited. And He is capable of revealing Himself. Those to whom He is not yet revealed may compare the experiences of others to their own and feel that everyone arrives at conclusions the same way. THis is emphatically not the case. Again, *truth* is imparted, beliefs not rooted in truth are *chosen.*
 
Upvote 0

Havoc

Celtic Witch
Jul 26, 2002
4,652
91
63
Realityville
Visit site
✟29,135.00
Faith
Pagan
Whitehorse said:
Actually, it's when you don't have the truth that you're not sure what the truth is.
Actually it's when you think you have the truth that you're sure what the truth is.

Those who have it, know it.
Those who don't have it but think they do, also "know" it. People "know" things all the time and are completely wrong. Why should we think you are somehow different?


Can you actually show that any of this is the case? Or is this just another of your beliefs that you emphatically insist is the truth despite the fact that you cannot substantiate any of it?


Again, *truth* is imparted, beliefs not rooted in truth are *chosen.*
Great. Show us that your beliefs are imparted truth...

What? You can't?

Ok then, your only reasonable claim is that you've chosen to believe this.


Whitehorse... when are you going to learn? Your claims are nothing more than claims, no matter how many times you state them, as if they were fact, over and over and over, ad nauseum. You cannot talk your beliefs into being truth just because you want them to be.
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist
Havoc said:
And we have just as much chance of being right about that as you.

Again, this sidesteps the essential element that truth is imparted rather than chosen. The source of truth is higher than man. And this statement makes two false assumptions:

1. The source of truth and the seeker of the truth, can be the same being. Obviously this cannot be so.

2. That truth, once it is discovered, is not self-evident even though it has been found. In reality, you can not have found something you haven't found. If you haven't found the truth, it's because...it isn't the truth that you *have* found.

Christianity is not chosen? Well there goes half the apologetics arguements of Christians. So you are forced into Christianity then?

Very good question, and I'm glad you asked. Christianity is an acknowledgement of what is true. You don't pick it because it can do something for you, but because it is true. But here is the truth on this:

1 Peter 2:9:

2:9But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar F6 people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:

Ephesians 1:4

1:4According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:

2 Thessalonians 2:13

2:13But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth:

THis is only the tip of the ice berg. THis shows that it is imparted. We *respond* to God's call. God is very kindly and dignified; he never operates without the cooperation of those He calls. But when we see the truth which is revealed only by God through His Holy Spirit and His servants then we know what the truth is. Then we respnd to it as such. Everyone who comes into the truth sees the trinkets of this world for the worthless junk it truly is.


See, that's the thing. We don't select. We don't say, well this belief offers this, and this belief offers that..Beliefs are chosen, yes. But truth is truth. It is revealed and responded to, because it is outside of the self. People choose out of the self-things they want. Things that suit *them*. THings they want to *believe.* But Christianity isn't something people sift through and then decide it works for them, although there are some that try. But Jesus's blood is no cheap sacrifice, and one of two things happens: either the person responds to the truth because God calls them, and they forsake their own purposes, or they fall away, proving they were never truly God's people afterall.

Another thing, and I will try to say this as delicately as I can, but personal understanding is no measure of truth. What I mean by that is, just because it is not *received* does not make it any less true. Reasonable is not what is revealed. If that were the case, the universe wouldn't exist. Only our galaxy or what we could determine. Also, the universe would expand with technology.

Take the principle of object permanence, for example. THis is when we discover that the things we cannot see are still in existence. The same is true of spiritual things. Usually, though, and I will try to say this as well as I can, is that people don't reject Christianity because it isn't true. They refuse it because it requires them to live for Someone outside of themselves and requires forsaking of personal desires. People want to create their own reality. Become gods as it were, determining truth according to their wills. But this is a deception. A sweet deception, sure, but a deception nevertheless. The truth is, we have no control over it whatsoever. We don't have the power to determine truth. It is what it is. The question is, do we value truth above all else, or do we value what we want more than we value truth?

The difficulty is, the truth will eventually be made plain to everyone. But then it is too late to change course. Anyone who is loyal to God will be concerned for the safety of the souls of others.

Well some of the people are offensive, especially when thay keep basing arguements on a "truth" they cannot show exists. I've already dealt with the "imparted, not chosen" fallacy.

By the way, calling something a fallacy doesn't make it one; it only lessens the weight of that word to use it inappropriately.

But God makes that decision. THis decision is never in our hands, as much as I realize many would like it to be. Here is what God says about it:

Luke 8:9-10 8:9And his disciples asked him, saying, What might this parable be?

8:10And he said, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand.


There's no getting around it. God only gives this truth to those who seek Him. Every pang to seek God is from God, but He allows people to reject it, too. But every earnest effort is rewarded be GOd. Does this negate His sovereignty? No, because He uses natural means to reveal His will. But every inkling to seek God, if it is not responded to, has the opposite effect: it hardens the heart. If it is reponded to, it makes the truth more visible, and God removes some of the cloud and distortion. Otherwise, it quenches the Holy Spirit and hardens the heart.

So God's sovereignty is no reason to ignore the call to salvation, and it should never be rejected.

If we cannot show that our Gods are the absolute truth then we have chosen them. You have chosen yours, I have chosen mine. If you ever come up with anything other than speculation to show the existence of your God you might have a leg to stand on.
Well it isn't the lack of proof that meakes a religion chosen. It is how the person arrives at their beliefs. If it isn't truth, it is because something became more important than the truth. TO put it clearly, most people reject Christianity because they want to run their own lives and they like to do things they would have to forsake. And those things are more important to them than the truth, but those things don't last. Only truth lasts forever. So the world is a very short-lived and expensive thing to have. And nothing that is temporal ever satisfies anyway.

Christianity was new at one time about 2000 years ago. By your arguement it was invalid at that time.

Actually it began when God did, which means it always existed. THe first humans were conscious of and had this relationship with GOd. Christianity is a separate word to signify the acknowledgement of the Messiah. But that doesn't mean we're now working with a different God. No, CHristianity has always been. It's just that the Messiah hadn't arrived yet.

Fine.. now show conclusively that it was your God's purpose and not the purpose of the myriad of other Gods and Goddesses who have just as verifiable a claim to us.

Verifiable is not truth. Because not all that is can be verified, and that which seems verifiable can be shrouded in distortion and delusion. Take a look in a fun house mirror. It isn't a true representation of yourself, even though it is a reflection. It reflects that which isn't true, and you see that which isn't true. But how do you know this? Going from mirror to mirror, your reflection changes. How do you know they're wrong? You asked a very good question, btw.

Correction: You believe you go to God for this authority. You judge the morality of other religions by their conformity to your beliefs.

Not by my beliefs, but imparted truth. It's a really important distinction to make, and I understand how it can be very difficult to think outide this realm of personal choice. In fact, it is impossible until the Holy Spirit indwells you. It completely changes the person's way of thinking, the whole mindset.


Yes!!! Exactly! It can *never* be proven by man. And that is God's intent. This is a brilliant conclusion that most people never understand their whole lives through, and I'm very impressed to hear you say this. However, unverifiable and false are not the same thing. Surely you see this as well. But you cannot tell someone who is indwelt by the Holy Spirit that they have exactly the same information as someone who isn't. You may not see it, and maybe you're someone who needs to see to believe. But it doesn;'t change reality. Because then all of reality would exist by personal preference. And we all know we're not that powerful.

Yes just a thought and not the fact it's purported to be.

You say this without knowledge, but I understand why you say it, even if it isn't accurate.

Blessings to you.
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist
\

When you say you are a Christian, what do you mean? Do you feel that Jesus would agree with this assessment?
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist
Havoc said:
Those who don't have it but think they do, also "know" it. People "know" things all the time and are completely wrong. Why should we think you are somehow different?

I didn't say "know"; I said know.

Can you actually show that any of this is the case? Or is this just another of your beliefs that you emphatically insist is the truth despite the fact that you cannot substantiate any of it?

Do you think He is capable of hiding from you? I'd really like to know the answer to this.

Great. Show us that your beliefs are imparted truth...

What? You can't?

Ok then, your only reasonable claim is that you've chosen to believe this.

Therefore I leave you to the mercy of your own insistenece that you're big enough to see everything that exists, supernatural included, and that anything you're not capable of seeing is false. Good providence to you.

Whitehorse... when are you going to learn? Your claims are nothing more than claims, no matter how many times you state them, as if they were fact, over and over and over, ad nauseum.

When are you going to understand that you can't say you don't know everything and that you do know everything at the same time? Sheesh! I'm not sure what's more work-work, or this vacation!

You cannot talk your beliefs into being truth just because you want them to be.

Then why do you not accept this for yourself?

Blessings to you.
 
Upvote 0

Jacob4Jesus

Dork For Jesus and Proud of It
Sep 18, 2003
2,826
170
50
Wauconda, IL
✟3,922.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Whitehorse said:
\

When you say you are a Christian, what do you mean? Do you feel that Jesus would agree with this assessment?
I don't feel I need to defend my status as a Christian, so I decline to do so. And yes, I think Jesus would agree with this assessment. Some people out there who preach and judge morality are in theirselves very immoral people. Others are extremely moral.

Then again, I am not Jesus and I can't speak for him. But I honestly believe this is how he would react to the situation, and therefore that is why I believe that is the right answer for me to give.

Prayers, Peace and Love,
Jacob
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist
Mylinkay Asdara said:
What? You would question another's Christianity simply because they believe that some wiccans they've met are highly moral people?

The definition is very important. You cannot claim to be a Christian if you do not believe the teachings of Christ. As it is written, and I know this is not a welcome verse for wiccans, but it is the truth and we're called to be faithful to God:

Galatians 5:19-21: 5:19Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,

5:20Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,

5:21Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.


We cannot truly love other people if we're not willing to give them the truth, even if they don't like it. But even before this, we are called to be loyal to God.
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist

Jacob, I certainly see what you're saying; there are some who profess to be Christians and are not, there are new Christians who are yet unsanctified, and there are those who struggle with some besetting sin. I agree with you there.

What I'm shooting for is definition. To define what falls into what category. I'm showing that witchcraft is in itself very offensive to God, and therefore cannot be moral.

Prayers, peace and love to you, too!
 
Upvote 0

TheOriginalWhitehorse

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2003
2,902
94
19
Visit site
✟26,032.00
Faith
Calvinist
Mylinkay Asdara said:
So you're saying that having a positive opinion of someone who is wiccan is being disloyal to your God in some way?

It would be immoral of me to lie to you just to make you happy. Take a gander at God's word in my post above. And I hope you would not have wiccans denied an uncomfortable truth at the expense of their souls. I cannot and will not do this.
 
Upvote 0

Mylinkay Asdara

Voice of Li'Adan
Sep 25, 2003
1,606
55
43
Visit site
✟2,068.00
Faith
Pagan
I never asked you to deny anything. I asked a question you have yet to answer: Is having a good opinion of a wiccan being disloyal to your God?
(BTW I'm not wiccan, I'm pagan there is a difference and while in may be all the same to you it is not to me and I expect you to at least have enough respect for me as a fellow human being to differenciate)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.