Yes, all religions are man made sets of rituals and myths designed to express a spiritual ideal. At its best religion offers structure to spirituality and provides a sense of community and continuity.Whitehorse said:That's exactly my point. It is a man-made religion.
I know of no religion that makes such a claim.But man isn't God, nor has he seen God, so this testifies to whether or not the religion is true.
In a Panentheistic or Pantheistic world view such spirits would be part of the Divine as the Divine is part of everything that is including humans. This is not in any way a suggestion that humans are Divine beings or could ever be mistaken for such. (I thought it important to point that out as you routinely bear false witness to that effect)In the meantime, the true God is offended by the worship of spirits who claim to be gods, but are not. The spirits are real. THe problem is, they aren't God. Good question.
As for your comment about a singular true God: All Gods and Goddess are true.
So far I see no difference between islam and Christianity. In both religiosn human means and force were and are deeply engrained.Another good question. Here we have to determine whether or not allah really is God. If you check into the history of the religion, and the fact that human means and force are deeply engrained in the religion, you'll start seeing the difference between the religions.
No real need to check back. You have consistently failed to show that your bible was in any way Divinely inspired rather than a work of individual men. The best that can be said is that you believe that it is but as I have often remarked to you believing that something is so does not necessarily make it so.Check back on some of the posts about the authenticity of scripture, and we can go from there if you like.
If you like, please check through the posts on the authenticity of scripture and the arguments against their being inspired by man. I'd be happy to discuss it further with you if you like.
If I remember my Christian mythology correctly the serpent in the garden simply told the truth and it was Yahweh that lied.Imitation: a good topic you brought up. Take a look at the third chapter of Genesis and what satan used to deceive Eve. Look at the specific argument he used. Then, bear in mind what led to his fall. This will reveal a lot.
1 Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, "Did God really say, 'You must not eat from any tree in the garden'?"
2 The woman said to the serpent, "We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, 3 but God did say, 'You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.' "
4 "You will not surely die," the serpent said to the woman. 5 "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."
6 When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it. 7 Then the eyes of both of them were opened
And ultimately the serpent was punished for either telling the truth and exposing Gods lie.
I fail to see your point.
Upvote
0