Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You do realize you have made the Bible a subset of PSEUDOSCIENCE.I'll address the pseudoscience part:
PSEUDOSCIENCE: Do not dare/want to ask questions.
AV1611VET: Ask away.
PSEUDOSCIENCE: Conduct a model based on preconceived ideas.
AV1611VET: Conduct a model based on the Bible.
PSEUDOSCIENCE: Find data that fits the model.
AV1611VET: Find data (if any exists) that fits the model.
PSEUDOSCIENCE: Discard data that does not align with the model.
AV1611VET: Discard data that contradicts the Bible.
The Bible is a model which contains lots of preconceived (and untestable) ideas.
AV1611VET's discarding of data ...
You do realize you have made the Bible a subset of PSEUDOSCIENCE.
That would make it PSEUDOPSEUDOSCIENCE.
Wait a moment that can't be right as PSEUDOPSEUDOSCIENCE = SCIENCE, we need to add an extra PSEUDO prefix.
Hence by your logic the Bible is PSEUDOPSEUDOPSEUDOSCIENCE.
This is almost as bad as an EU fanatic in this forum who will remain nameless inadvertently stumbled on 1 = 0.5.
OK I'll ask the question.So if you don't ask away ... then what?
OK I'll ask the question.
Show me the archaeological evidence which supports Geneses or Exodus?
You exaggerate way past the pointOn the science side of the scientific method, the wall for creationist ideas is at ‘Conduct a Hypothesis.’ This is the stop-gap for anything other than accepted norms of evolutionary theory, where it is bludgeoned to death in public with concentrated scientific community ridicule.
Now now, play fair. Ya gotta tip the playingOK I'll ask the question.
Show me the archaeological evidence which supports Geneses or Exodus?
Nobody can " conduct a hypothesis".On the science side of the scientific method, the wall for creationist ideas is at ‘Conduct a Hypothesis.’ This is the stop-gap for anything other than accepted norms of evolutionary theory, where it is bludgeoned to death in public with concentrated scientific community ridicule.
I was just quoting from sjastro's chart... are you saying that's false information?Nobody can " conduct a hypothesis".
That is not physical evidence.The existence of the Jews.
I can't remember the story now, but a famous evangelist was talking to the queen of England, and she asked him to authenticate the Bible in one sentence; to which he replied he could authenticate It in one word: "Jew."
No concessions he has to abide by the rules.Now now, play fair. Ya gotta tip the playing
field to 90 degrees
What? You just requoted him saying exactly that.He does not reject Science. That would be intellectual dishonesty.
The lies and fraud from yecs (see paluxy man tracks, for one) are contemptible.
Just a term of speech:I was just quoting from sjastro's chart... are you saying that's false information?
You do realize you have made the Bible a subset of PSEUDOSCIENCE.
That would make it PSEUDOPSEUDOSCIENCE.
Wait a moment that can't be right as PSEUDOPSEUDOSCIENCE = SCIENCE, we need to add an extra PSEUDO prefix.
Hence by your logic the Bible is PSEUDOPSEUDOPSEUDOSCIENCE.
This is almost as bad as an EU fanatic in this forum who will remain nameless inadvertently stumbled on 1 = 0.5.
The existence of the Jews.
I can't remember the story now, but a famous evangelist was talking to the queen of England, and she asked him to authenticate the Bible in one sentence; to which he replied he could authenticate It in one word: "Jew."
Just science I suppose.Quoting an error doesn't help you
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?