Abraham agreed in Genesis 12 and Genesis 20, yet both Pharaoh and Abimelech felt it necessary to make reparations to Abraham.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Abraham agreed in Genesis 12 and Genesis 20, yet both Pharaoh and Abimelech felt it necessary to make reparations to Abraham.If a husband agrees with AI then his right to be sure all his children are his has not been broken in any way. That is why some have said that the husband should agree.
One point behind my view is that the Bible is a complete book, and the answer to modern questions is there.
I read men who go through this are squeemish and embarrased at first and get used to it later.
If a woman is an unbeliever and leaves her husband, Paul in Corinthians writes he maye let her go, no obligations.
But if she is a believer it is different.
I am sure from the principles of God's word that not a finger and not seed from another man should go into a man's wife's loins except her husband's.
I don't understand what you are saying here.In AI the latter part of people fusing happens, seed of body and seed of body. The latter part of union. It is a restatement, how can you miss or overlook it in direct contradiction?
Are you saying that seeing a gynecologist is also adultery?
How far do you take this logic? Would you prefer a woman die of cancer than have a surgeon touch her?
I'm just curious where you are coming from.
It is very simple to understand really. The things you mentioned as being ethics in AI which you say they believe they should not do are not taken into consideration with adoption. If it is wrong in AI then it is also wrong in adoption. It is that simple. If you believe that the child in AI needs to be of same race (or nationality) then the same must apply to adoption. However it is clear that does not happen. While it is true that a childs faith often reflects the parents are you saying we should just leave any others to burn in hell forever???? How puzzling I thought you would want to give every child a chance to grow up in a christian ommunity rather than saying sorry his sperm comes from a muslim background so we don't want it in a christian family.[FONT=Georgia, serif]I cannot understand your response to the point on ethics. The mixing of seed is part of marriage. If one gives her seed and her husband gives her seed to mix with another, to me, that looks like part of a marriage, cell fusion with someone else, not her husband.[/FONT]
Can you please give scripture that proves Joseph adopted Jesus[FONT=Georgia, serif]Adoption is not adultery, Joseph adopted Jesus. Before Joseph married Mary she was with child, supernatural formation.[/FONT]
I see no evidence of AI in either of those passages. I saw your earlier posts about these passages and it can be argued that adultery was involved but it can also be argued adultery wasn't involved.Abraham agreed in Genesis 12 and Genesis 20, yet both Pharaoh and Abimelech felt it necessary to make reparations to Abraham.
There is nothing relating to AI in those passages.Abraham agreed in Genesis 12 and Genesis 20, yet both Pharaoh and Abimelech felt it necessary to make reparations to Abraham.
How about this?Can you please give scripture that proves Joseph adopted Jesus
please. I have never seen any evidence to back up that claim. Sure Jesus was raised in the same house as Joseph but even at a very young age Jesus referred to God as his father. See the story where Jesus as a young boy is teaching in the temple after his parents have started the trip home. His response was Did you not know I would be in my Father's house?"
No, of course. It was a response to the argument that there is no violation when the husband consents.There is nothing relating to AI in those passages.
I did see your ealier posts relating to those passages and while it can be argued adultery was involved it can also be argued that adultery was not involved. I don't see it as being conclusive one way or another.
Another man apart from the husband, his sex cells from his loins going into the first man's wife, and fusing with her seed in her heart, creating a special bond between the the wife and donor, she never meets.
That verse is other people talking about their view of him. Jesus as a young boy refereed to his Father's house and by that he meant the temple. Later he asked who is my family and told a story that clearly illustrates that just because they are blood relatives does not make them family to him. He gave quite a different definition of family. I think two verses where jesus is talking about his family outweighs one verse where other people are giving their opinions. Opinions which are not confirmed (or denied).How about this?
[bible]matthew 13:55[/bible]
Is artificial insemination adulterous?
Another man apart from the husband, his sex cells from his loins going into the first man's wife, and fusing with her seed in her heart, creating a special bond between the the wife and donor, she never meets.
Another man apart from the husband, his sex cells from his loins going into the first man's wife, and fusing with her seed in her heart, creating a special bond between the the wife and donor, she never meets.
GoldenKingGaze said:I think that if the doctor, that is the gynecologist need turn a baby around as some ultrasounds show is need for head first birth, then the mother should pray for renewed separation to God and her husband. I don't know that, I just think so.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?