• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is anyone actually a solipsist?

acropolis

so rad
Jan 29, 2008
3,676
277
✟27,793.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Adding to what I said earlier, it is impossible to doubt the existence of everything outside the mind. If my mind was the only thing in existence, then there could be no new information added that I was previously unaware of. If I am not aware of it, it is not in my mind. Since there is new information that passes through my mind constantly, I must conclude that there is something that exists outside my mind. And again, if I cannot doubt that there exists even one other thing outside my mind, then I cannot be a solipsist.

EDIT: Someone is probably going to bring up the unconscious mind. I maintain that something which does not think cannot be a mind. Trying to shore up solipsism by changing the definition of the mind to include non-thinking entities is not an effective argument.

EDIT2: David Deutsch destroys solipsism more effectively and eloquently than I could.
 
Upvote 0

peter22

Senior Member
May 15, 2007
541
28
✟23,330.00
Faith
Buddhist
If my mind was the only thing in existence, then there could be no new information added that I was previously unaware of. If I am not aware of it, it is not in my mind. Since there is new information that passes through my mind constantly, I must conclude that there is something that exists outside my mind.

Not necessarily. Imagine if you really are a brain in a jar under the surface of the moon. If the illusion of your life is a computer program of incredible complexity, it can just change the program for any "new" experiences.
 
Upvote 0
S

Steezie

Guest
No it's not. That's the whole point. *I* can only know that *my* mind exists.
But if you have MILLIONS of other individuals stating that they exist, thats a mountain of circumstantial evidence (on top of MANY other things) to suggest the existence of outside forces. All that evidence, while circumstantial if you trust only your mind, does add up
 
Upvote 0

acropolis

so rad
Jan 29, 2008
3,676
277
✟27,793.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Not necessarily. Imagine if you really are a brain in a jar under the surface of the moon. If the illusion of your life is a computer program of incredible complexity, it can just change the program for any "new" experiences.

I wouldn't be a solipsist if I believed in moons outside my mind, brains outside my mind, or advanced computer systems outside my mind. All of those things would be real outside of my own thoughts, and I cannot believe in them to be a solipsist.
 
Upvote 0

peter22

Senior Member
May 15, 2007
541
28
✟23,330.00
Faith
Buddhist
But if you have MILLIONS of other individuals stating that they exist, thats a mountain of circumstantial evidence (on top of MANY other things) to suggest the existence of outside forces. All that evidence, while circumstantial if you trust only your mind, does add up
You're not really getting it. You can't trust your senses or your experiences. It doesn't matter WHAT happens, the basic sceptical view is, "I might be being deceived therefore you and your 4.5 billion friends don't exist."
 
Upvote 0

peter22

Senior Member
May 15, 2007
541
28
✟23,330.00
Faith
Buddhist
I wouldn't be a solipsist if I believed in moons outside my mind, brains outside my mind, or advanced computer systems outside my mind. All of those things would be real outside of my own thoughts, and I cannot believe in them to be a solipsist.
Again, no. These are illustrative examples. Solipsism doesn't dictate that anything is as it is, it just claims that I cannot know anything beyond the existence of my own mind.
 
Upvote 0

funyun

aude sapere...sed praeterea, aude esse
Feb 14, 2004
3,637
163
37
Visit site
✟4,544.00
Faith
Atheist
I'm sure there are some solipsists out there. Personally I understand the epistemological quandary that leads to a solipsistic argument and so I'm sympathetic to the the argument itself. Although I don't agree with it ontologically speaking, I always defend the basic skeptical argument because it relates to very important epistemological truths like uncertainty and the a priori/a posteriori distinction.
 
Upvote 0

toirewadokodesuka

Well-Known Member
Dec 15, 2007
602
23
✟862.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
i think the theory that there are dimentions that exist but we cant sense, is grounds for thinking that the universe is somewhat of an illusion. im sure if i could sense everything, when i looked at the sky or any other material objects, i would be seeing something in a much different way. i dont think the universe doesnt exist, i think the universe is just blurry to us.
 
Upvote 0