- May 5, 2017
- 6
- 1
- 27
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
First of all let me state that I would not be surprised if it rubs people the wrong way, and no, i'm not intentionally trying to come off as an elitist, rather it's something my OCD won't let me stop thinking about, so hopefully somebody here can offer a decent response.
Here is my proposed hierarchy:
Scenario 1: The person has had a direct personal experience with God, and is incapable of an honest denial of God's existence. Faith in god is undeniably genuine.
Scenario 2: The person does not start out as a Christian, or leaves but after much intellectualizing and/or personal anguish rejects the other choices and makes the classical "leap of faith". This person has no more evidence than the one in scenario 3, however being proactive rather than passive means that
Scenario 3: The belief of this person is just as genuine as that in scenario 2, however the fact they were raised that way means that effort was not needed to believe nor is it likely a choice was ever made to do so. Not considering alternatives also means that if they were raised in another religion they would likely show a similar aversion to Christianity.
Scenario 4: This person is nearing the end of his life, thinks the time is right to apply Pascal's wager, and currently trying to brainwash himself into believing.
Of course this is all moot if you reject human agency, and yes I acknowledge I have simplified it, but fire away!
Here is my proposed hierarchy:
Scenario 1: The person has had a direct personal experience with God, and is incapable of an honest denial of God's existence. Faith in god is undeniably genuine.
Scenario 2: The person does not start out as a Christian, or leaves but after much intellectualizing and/or personal anguish rejects the other choices and makes the classical "leap of faith". This person has no more evidence than the one in scenario 3, however being proactive rather than passive means that
Scenario 3: The belief of this person is just as genuine as that in scenario 2, however the fact they were raised that way means that effort was not needed to believe nor is it likely a choice was ever made to do so. Not considering alternatives also means that if they were raised in another religion they would likely show a similar aversion to Christianity.
Scenario 4: This person is nearing the end of his life, thinks the time is right to apply Pascal's wager, and currently trying to brainwash himself into believing.
Of course this is all moot if you reject human agency, and yes I acknowledge I have simplified it, but fire away!